Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: Killing Workers’ Freedom to Bargain More Important than Passing Homeland Security Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:16 PM
Original message
Bush: Killing Workers’ Freedom to Bargain More Important than Passing Homeland Security Bill


http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/03/01/bush-killing-workers-freedom-to-bargain-more-important-than-passing-homeland-security-bill/

Bush: Killing Workers’ Freedom to Bargain More Important than Passing Homeland Security Bill

by Mike Hall, Mar 1, 2007

So, what’s more important to President Bush—fighting terrorism or busting unions? You can come to your own conclusions, but, on Tuesday, the Bush White House said it would veto an anti-terrorism bill that includes many of the recommendations of the bipartisan 9-11 Commission if it includes a provision that grants collective bargaining rights to 43,000 airport screeners in the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

In another insult to America’s workers, Bush yesterday swore to veto the Employee Free Choice Act that is up for a House vote today.

The usual lineup of anti-worker Republicans in the Senate also plan to gut TSA workers’ freedom to have a voice on the job. As The New York Times reports:

In a letter sent Tuesday to the White House, Senator Jim DeMint, Republican
of South Carolina, and 35 other Senate Republicans said they were prepared,
if necessary, to sustain a veto.

AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney puts it this way:

It’s ironic that the Bush administration blocked TSA officers from having a voice on the job under the guise of national security. Airport screeners are entrusted with a vitally important duty and must be free to speak up about where improvements can be made to best protect our nation from terrorist attacks. Without bargaining and appeals rights, TSA workers are subject to workplace discrimination and retaliation for pointing out shortcomings in security procedures.

In January, the House included the collective bargaining provision in the Sept. 11 bill and Senate Democrats added the pro-worker language to the Senate version when it passed out of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee last month.

The provision would repeal a portion of the 2002 Aviation and Transportation Security Act that gave the Bush administration the authority to end bargaining rights for TSA workers. In 2003, as TSA workers at several airports were readying to vote on joining AFGE, the Bush administration, citing so-called “national security” concerns, terminated the screeners’ collective bargaining rights.

Says AFGE President John Gage:

With no protections, are subject to workplace discrimination, retaliation, adverse actions, un­scheduled mandatory overtime and fear of speaking out on issues of security.

Congressional Republicans blocked several attempts to restore the TSA workers’ rights, but the new Democratic majority is making workplace fairness issues a top priority, as demonstrated by their efforts in the TSA fight and Employee Free Choice Act legislation.

FULL story at link.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yogi Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just another way.....
* tries to screw the American worker.

Union YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC