http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17302994/site/newsweek/Critics say the 'tabletop exercise,' aimed at testing responses to an IED assault, stokes a state of fear.
Feb. 23, 2007 - The White House is staging a high-level exercise Saturday to test responses to the prospect of a massive domestic terrorist attack involving IEDs (improvised explosive devices)—the same deadly roadside bombs that have been used by insurgents against the U.S. military in Iraq.
snip
The senior administration official played down that concern, saying the scenario is “not based on any existing or current intelligence” that terrorists are plotting IED attacks inside the U.S. The official noted, however, that both the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 and the
Oklahoma City bombing of 1995 both involved versions of homemade bombs inside the country. “This has been a threat for the last 14 years,” the official said.But one Democratic lawmaker quickly questioned the need for such elaborate exercises, saying this one seemed more the product of overheated imaginations than real-life threats.
“Sometimes I have a sense they’re watching too many reruns of ’24',” said Rep. Jim Moran, a Virginia Democrat who serves on the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee. “They need to get a grip. We don’t have IEDs here. They’re creating a state of fear beyond what is helpful.”
http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_5271117
McVeigh and Nichols were the only defendants indicted in the bombing. However, Nichols alleges others were involved.
McVeigh told him he was recruited for undercover missions while serving in the military, according to Nichols. He says he learned sometime in 1995 that there had been a change in the bombing target and that McVeigh was upset by that.
"There, in what I believe was an accidental slip of the tongue, McVeigh revealed the identity of a high-ranking FBI official who was apparently directing McVeigh in the bomb plot,"
Just a bit fear mongering or do they have other surprises for us?