Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Employing selective secrecy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Doondoo Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 08:19 AM
Original message
Employing selective secrecy
The Bush administration is keen on secrecy, and it makes no apologies for that policy. It believes in keeping a tight hold on information unless it has a good reason not to. Since it took office, the number of decisions to classify documents has soared, while the process of declassifying old secrets has slowed drastically. All this has been necessary, in the administration's view, to protect national security in time of war.

But it is not incapable of opening up to the public when it has sufficient motivation--as we have learned in the trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff. And when the White House decides to declassify secrets, it can do so with head-spinning alacrity. One such occasion came when former Ambassador Joseph Wilson wrote an article for The New York Times accusing the administration of distorting intelligence information to make its case for the invasion of Iraq.

That charge forced the White House to acknowledge that the president's 2003 State of the Union address contained false information about Saddam Hussein's supposed efforts to obtain uranium for nuclear weapons from the African nation of Niger. But it also spurred high administration officials to try to discredit Wilson and to debunk claims that he had earlier gone to Niger at the behest of the vice president.

What did the White House do? Libby and other aides informed several reporters that Wilson was married to CIA operative Valerie Plame--suggesting that he had been picked for the assignment because of nepotism rather than expertise. Libby's role in the apparent outing of Plame, and his testimony about it during prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation, are behind his trial for perjury and obstruction of justice.

What has gotten less notice is Libby's grand jury testimony that Cheney instructed him to leak parts of a secret 2002 National Intelligence Estimate to rebut Wilson's claims. By Libby's account, even the declassification was done in secret, with only the president and vice president knowing about it--even as other aides argued for releasing it. And once Bush and Cheney recognized the value of this particular disclosure, it took no time at all for them to authorize it.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0702130243feb13,0,6502758.story?coll=chi-newsopinion-hed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC