Harvard Expert Predicts Alarming Costs Of Veterans

[RedEarth]

Harvard Expert Predicts Alarming Costs Of Veterans
Will Be Over $660 Billion Over Next Few Decades
Posted 2 hr. 30 min. ago
Linda Bilmes of Harvard publishes a scathing opinion in today's LA Times about the cost of veteran's benefits, which is an alarming $660 billion in coming decades.

She writes: "The New Year brought with it the 3000th American death in Iraq. But what's equally alarming — and far less well known — is that for every fatality in Iraq, there are 16 injuries. That's an unprecedented casualty level. In the Vietnam and Korean wars, by contrast, there were fewer than three people wounded for each fatality. In World Wars I and II, there were less than two. That means we now have more than 50,000 wounded Iraq war soldiers. In one sense, this reflects positive change: Better medical care and stronger body armor are enabling many more soldiers to survive injuries that might have led, in earlier generations, to death. But like so much else about this war, the Bush administration failed to foresee what it would mean, failed to plan for the growing tide of veterans who would be in urgent need of medical and disability care. The result is that as the Iraq war approaches its fourth anniversary, the Department of Veterans Affairs is buckling under a growing volume of disability claims and rising demand for medical attention."

In addition, Web site Buzzflash gives a must-read overview of the story and some of the criticism surrounding Bilmes and links to other stories related to it, including the criticism from the Pentagon -- interesting, since this is where she got her numbers from.

Buzzflash also writes: "Shockingly, the Pentagon has also changed its posted data in a move eerily reminiscent of the "Records Department" portrayed in Orwell's 1984."

Defense officials are blasting her findings and even called Bilmes and her dean to complain, along with the LA Times after the paper published an op-ed Bilmes wrote on her findings.

Bilmes teaches public finance at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. She is the co-author, with Joseph Stiglitz, of the report, "The Economic Cost of the Iraq War."

http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/1208/Harvard_Expert_Predicts_Alarming_Costs_Of_Veterans


The battle of Iraq's wounded
The U.S. is poorly equipped to care for the tens of thousands of soldiers injured in Iraq.
By Linda Bilmes, LINDA BILMES teaches public finance at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. She is the coauthor, with Joseph Stiglitz, of the report, "The Economic Cost of the Iraq War: An Appraisa
January 5, 2007


THE NEW YEAR brought with it the 3,000th American death in Iraq. But what's equally alarming — and far less well known — is that for every fatality in Iraq, there are 16 injuries. That's an unprecedented casualty level. In the Vietnam and Korean wars, by contrast, there were fewer than three people wounded for each fatality. In World Wars I and II, there were less than two.

That means we now have more than 50,000 wounded Iraq war soldiers. In one sense, this reflects positive change: Better medical care and stronger body armor are enabling many more soldiers to survive injuries that might have led, in earlier generations, to death. But like so much else about this war, the Bush administration failed to foresee what it would mean, failed to plan for the growing tide of veterans who would be in urgent need of medical and disability care. The result is that as the Iraq war approaches its fourth anniversary, the Department of Veterans Affairs is buckling under a growing volume of disability claims and rising demand for medical attention.

So far, more than 200,000 veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan have been treated at VA medical facilities — three times what the VA projected, according to a Government Accountability Office analysis. More than one-third of them have been diagnosed with mental health conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder, acute depression and substance abuse. Thousands more have crippling disabilities such as brain or spinal injuries. In each of the last two years, the VA has underestimated the number of veterans who would seek help and the cost of treating them — forcing it to go cap in hand to Congress for billions of dollars in emergency funding.

The VA system has a reputation for high-quality care, but waiting lists to see a doctor at some facilities now run as long as several months. Shortages are particularly acute in mental health care. Dr. Frances Murphy, the VA's deputy undersecretary for health, recently wrote that some VA clinics do not provide mental health or substance abuse care, or if they do, "waiting lists render that care virtually inaccessible."

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-bilmes5jan05,0,7081730.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions

[sam sarrha]

1. add at the value of F*ckig up families lives, widows, orphans.. priceless