Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama: A Chance To Change The Game

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 04:14 PM
Original message
Barack Obama: A Chance To Change The Game
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/03/AR2007010301620.html

A Chance To Change The Game

By Barack Obama
Thursday, January 4, 2007; Page A17

snip//

We must stop any and all practices that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a public servant has become indebted to a lobbyist. That means a full ban on gifts and meals. It means no free travel or subsidized travel on private jets. And it means closing the revolving door to ensure that Capitol Hill service -- whether as a member of Congress or as a staffer -- isn't all about lining up a high-paying lobbying job. We should no longer tolerate a House committee chairman shepherding the Medicare prescription drug bill through Congress at the same time he's negotiating for a job as the pharmaceutical industry's top lobbyist.

But real reform also means real enforcement. We need to finally take the politics and the partisanship out of ethics investigations. Whether or not the House ethics committee has been covering for its colleagues, the secrecy with which its members have operated has led people to question why legislators who are serving jail time were not caught and stopped by the committee in the first place. It's led people to wonder why Congress cannot seem to police itself.

I have long proposed a nonpartisan, independent ethics commission that would act as the American people's public watchdog over Congress. The commission would be staffed with former judges and former members of Congress from both parties, and it would allow any citizen to report possible ethics violations by lawmakers, staff members or lobbyists. Once a potential violation is reported, the commission would have the authority to conduct investigations, issue subpoenas, gather records, call witnesses, and provide a report to the Justice Department or the House and Senate ethics committees that -- unlike current ethics committee reports -- is available for all citizens to read.

This would improve the current process in two ways. First, it would take politics out of the fact-finding phase of ethics investigations. Second, it would exert greater public pressure on Congress to punish wrongdoing quickly and severely. Others have proposed similar good ideas on enforcement, and I am open to all options. We must restore the American people's confidence in the ethics process by ensuring that political self-interest can no longer prevent politicians from enforcing ethics rules.

The truth is, we cannot change the way Washington works unless we first change the way Congress works. On Nov. 7, voters gave Democrats the chance to do this. But if we miss this opportunity to clean up our act and restore this country's faith in government, the American people might not give us another one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
az chela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I absolutely agree with this.
This is one of the biggest problems our government has
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. See Eliot Spitzer in New York
He could teach Obama a lesson or two.

Let's just say we're implementing while Obama talks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. More Like a Chance to "Game" Obama
I have all respect for impetuous youth--I was one myself, with maybe as much loyal support behind me as Obama has (not much), and I still have the tendencies, but I've been handed my head far too many times to think that Obama stands the chance of a snowball in hell of getting through the primaries, and forget about actually taking office! He's too young, too unknown, way too green, and not a good candidate for the nation at any time, but least of all in this most perilous of times. He has no mentor, no sherpa, nada!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. what ever you say.....
He's too young to be President. Hmmm....Teddy Roosevelt was 42. John Kennedy was 43. Obama is 45. I guess Obama is too young! SARC

Just a question...Teddy Roosevelt and John Kennedy were white....did anyone describe them as having "impetuous youth"...meaning, that they could not win?

As to unknown....so Obama is unknown? Is that the reason why Obama in a recent Gallup poll was the third most admired person? I guess nobody heard of him. Heck, he hasn't been in the news....sarc.

"not a good candidate for the nation at any time, but least of all in this most perilous of times"...wow that sounds authoritative, except you haven't given one reason why....is it because he is "green" or because he is black?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. FWIW, I took the 'impetuous youth' comment to mean his past
drug history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. also said "way too young"
the constitution says 35....should we scrap the constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm not suggesting I agree with the person you don't agree with
(tactfully, I might add), but I tend to move on sometimes when I don't agree. Other times, I might call them on it, but when they don't respond, it doesn't matter.
So, Obama is "way too green, and not a good candidate for the nation at any time": I agree he's a bit green/lacking experience, but I truly don't agree he couldn't be a great candidate, or even VP. The man has charisma, is very smart, and is an asset to the Democratic party. He will definitely be a force to be reckoned with! I hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC