Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And This Just in on Elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 08:02 PM
Original message
And This Just in on Elections
And This Just in on Elections
Opinion
New York Times
Published: December 16, 2006


"Two years too late, the Federal Election Commission has gotten around to slapping token fines on a few notorious abusers of the campaign law’s ban on unregulated mudslinging money. That guarantees we will see a lot more mud being slung in 2008.

The commission — ever the enabler, rarely the watchdog, of big-money politics — declined in the 2004 campaign to rein in the unlimited financing of such obviously partisan efforts as the Republicans’ Swift Boat attack ads against Senator John Kerry and the Democrats’ MoveOn.org assaults on President Bush. Shadowy party operatives, called 527 groups under a section of the tax code, sold the commission a bill of goods that they were mere issue advocates, not hard-edged activists crying out to be covered by the law’s limits on donations.

But now, with a skeptical federal judge breathing down its neck and the election long over, the commission finds that, well, yes, there were grounds to levy fines of several hundred-thousand dollars against the two groups as well as another Democratic operation. Considering the scores of millions these groups raised from fat-cat donors, corporations and labor unions — all looking for a loophole in the McCain-Feingold law’s ban on unlimited party donations — the fines are a pittance and unlikely to dissuade repeat offenses.

The additional scandal is that the commission created the loophole in the first place, by declining the obvious need for a blanket regulation controlling candidate-oriented advertising and opting for a slow case-by-case review of 527 machinations. This dedication to doing next to nothing allowed various stealth partisans to pollute the last two elections with more than $950 million in 527 financing.

............SNIP"

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/16/opinion/16sat3.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice of the NY Times to weigh in "two years too late". Their
silence has also been deafening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC