Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gaffney and Horowitz Accuse Norquist of Treason

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:11 PM
Original message
Gaffney and Horowitz Accuse Norquist of Treason
Atrios picked up on this at:http://atrios.blogspot.com/

A Troubling Influence
By Frank J Gaffney Jr.

This is from David Horowitz's introduction:
It is with a heavy heart therefore, that I am posting this article, which is the most complete documentation extant of Grover Norquist’s activities in behalf of the Islamist Fifth Column. I have confronted Grover about these issues and have talked to others who have done likewise. But it has been left to Frank Gaffney and a few others, including Daniel Pipes and Steven Emerson, to make the case and to suffer the inevitable recriminations that have followed earlier disclosures of some aspects of this story.

Up to now, the controversy over these charges has been dismissed or swept under the rug, as a clash of personalities or the product of one of those intra-bureaucratic feuds so familiar to the Washington scene. Unfortunately, this is wishful thinking. The reality is much more serious. No one reading this document to its bitter end will confuse its claims and confirming evidence with those of a political cat fight. On the basis of the evidence assembled here, it seems beyond dispute that Grover Norquist has formed alliances with prominent Islamic radicals who have ties to the Saudis and to Libya and to Palestine Islamic Jihad, and who are now under indictment by U.S. authorities. Equally troubling is that the arrests of these individuals and their exposure as agents of terrorism have not resulted in noticeable second thoughts on Grover’s part or any meaningful effort to dissociate himself from his unsavory friends.

As Frank Gaffney’s article recounts, Grover’s own Islamic Institute was initially financed by one of the most notorious of these operatives, Abdurahman Alamoudi, a supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah who told the Annual Convention of the Islamic Association of Palestine in 1996, “If we are outside this country we can say ‘Oh, Allah destroy America.’ But once we are here, our mission in this country is to change it.” Grover appointed Alamoudi’s deputy, Khaled Saffuri to head his own organization. Together they gained access to the White House for Alamoudi and Sami al-Arian and others with similar agendas who used their cachet to spread Islamist influence to the American military and the prison system and the universities and the political arena with untold consequences for the nation.

Parts of this story have been published before, but never in such detail and never with the full picture of Islamist influence in view. No doubt, that is partly because of Grover Norquist’s large (and therefore intimidating) presence in the Washington community. Many have been quite simply afraid to raise these issues and thus have allowed Grover to make them seem a matter of individual personality differences. This suits his agendas well, as it does those of his Islamist allies. If matters in dispute reflect personal animosity or “racial” prejudice, as Grover insists, then the true gravity of these charges is obscured. The fact remains that while Grover has denied the charges or sought to dismiss them with such arguments on many occasions, he has never answered them. If he wishes to do so now, the pages of frontpagemag.com are open to him.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=11209
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pass the popcorn!
GOP Reality TV, where they don't throw you off the Island, they eat your ass alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. CAT FIGHT!!!
But I'll read the article too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Karl Rove must be ticked at Norquist
Don't think Horowitz would do this without clearing it first. More lining up the troops and the message for 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is great
Eat it, Grover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. What a beautiful day.
The Republicans have finally faced their enemy, and they are it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. 1997 Article: Why Grover Norquist Might Go to Jail
Six years ago, I tried to warn both sides of the political aisle about one of Washington's most powerful -- and dangerous -- lobbyists, Grover Norquist. Today, his former allies on the right are scrutinizing his ties to Islamists. From the APJ archives, here's my article on Norquist as it originally ran at koopersmith.com.


http://www.americanpolitics.com/111197GOPCrimesUPD.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. "used their cachet to spread Islamist influence to the American military"
Substitute any other religious identifier for Islamist and you would have to agree this is bigoted language. The fact that it is being written about Grover Norquist doesn't make it acceptable. Gafney and Horowitz have much to answer for as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I take "Islamist" to mean fundamentalists, not merely
Islamics or Muslims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. The article is chock-full of innuendo
but makes absolutely fantastic opposition research material on Bush! Thanks, Horowitz!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. PNAC v Norquist ... when neocons and corpocrat worlds collide.
What happens to the Tuesday with Grover meetups?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC