Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SEESHOLTZ: When Prostitution is Called 'A Marriage of Convenience'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 12:57 PM
Original message
SEESHOLTZ: When Prostitution is Called 'A Marriage of Convenience'
When Prostitution is Called 'A Marriage of Convenience'

October 24 2006
Counterbias.com
MEL SEESHOLTZ


David Kuo is a conservative Christian. Until 2003 he was deputy director of President Bush’s Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. Even before his new book Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of Political Seduction was released (pertinent excerpts from the book are now available), fallout from the nuclear detonation – or “nu-cu-lar” as linguistically-challenged George W. would say – was being reported:

A former Bush aide claims that evangelical Christians were embraced for political gain at the White House but derided privately as “nuts,” “ridiculous” and “goofy.” … Kuo's account of how the faith-based office has been regarded inside the White House recalls that of another high-level alumnus of the program. John J. DiIulio Jr., the faith-based office’s first director, who quit in 2002, told Esquire magazine that “Mayberry Machiavellis” led by Rove based policy only on re-election concerns.


The evangelical Christian Right thought they’d finally found their messiah in George W. Bush who would lead them to the promised land of their New World Order. What they got was a screw-up who most of the world considers the greatest threat to global peace and whose domestic policies have been fiascos, failures, or both.

Continue.. http://www.counterbias.com/783.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. "christians" trick fucked by bush and they are in denial
bush's base, the group responsible for the demise of our military and the ruination of our economy got fucked royally by the grand old party; lied to, duped and conned into thinking bush was a honest, moral, fine upstanding "christian."

Isn't it telling that liberals knew what bush was years ago and now the rest of the world (except the religiously insane dupes who still support bush) are opening their little puppy eyes and seeing a monster.

"Christians" do not deserve constitutional liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Naughty, naughty. Not keeping the faith. Kool Aide pitcher ran dry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twilight_sailing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am so old that I remember Regan.
The Republicans have been dragging the radical religious right around by the short hairs for many years now. Or is it the other way around? No, I think I had it right the firt time. The radical religious right hasn't gotten much out of the deal. The Republican party has been been the big winner.

I don't know if the radical religious right will ever wake up and realize that they have been used. Probably not. They are not part of the reality based community.

But they should realize it. This has been going on for a LONG time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC