Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Columbia Journalism Review: Debating the Body Count in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 09:35 AM
Original message
Columbia Journalism Review: Debating the Body Count in Iraq
Cluster sampling, in which researchers interview families from a few representative segments of society and then extrapolate out to arrive at an estimate, is how most surveys are conducted. It's how exit polls are run. It's also the method by which we've come to the figure 400,000 for the number of people killed in Darfur, a measurement that has allowed the media to call what is happening there a genocide.

In this study, 50 clusters were randomly selected from 16 of Iraq's Governorates, with every cluster consisting of 40 households. And out of the 1,849 households, there were 1,474 births and 629 deaths in the 40 months post-invasion. Whereas the mortality rate before the war was 5.5 per 1,000 people per year, since March 2003 it has been 13.3 per 1,000 people per year. Multiply that out for the whole country and they arrive at an average of 654,965 for the whole of Iraq, with a margin of error between 426,369 and 793,663.

There are two reasons for thinking the survey might be more accurate than has been portrayed, both of which were not mentioned much yesterday. First, the researchers were able to duplicate, with different households, the results of a survey they conducted two years ago (which was also widely disputed) that put the death toll then at 100,000. And secondly, the pre-invasion mortality rate of 5.5 per 1,000 people per year, found in both surveys, is similar to the estimate used by the CIA and the U.S. Census Bureau.
...
There seems just as much reason to trust these numbers as to doubt them. It should also be remembered that though the White House or Iraqi authorities may be unhappy with this news, it is not as if they are offering alternative figures. As the New York Times reminded us in its article, the Iraqi government recently barred the central morgue in Baghdad and the Health Ministry from releasing information about civilian deaths. The American military won't even give numbers, preferring to stick to percentage comparisons, citing, for example, a 46 percent drop in the murder rate in Baghdad in August from July as proof that the recent crackdown has been effective.

http://www.cjrdaily.org/politics/debating_the_body_count_in_ira.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. So much for the "methodology" criticism
When the Chimp used this word, I KNEW he didn't know what it meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC