Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interview with Albright: "Iraq Was a Really Badly Planned Operation"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 08:48 AM
Original message
Interview with Albright: "Iraq Was a Really Badly Planned Operation"
With the US bogged down in Iraq and Iran defiant over its nuclear program, US foreign policy makers are faced with numerous challenges. SPIEGEL ONLINE spoke with former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright about breeding terrorists in Iraq, the Iran crisis, and how the Haditha massacre became possible.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Ms. Albright, America's image in the world isn't in great shape these days. Things are looking especially bad in Iraq with daily reports of violence, the country teetering on the brink of civil war, and now a scandal erupting over an alleged massacre perpetrated by the US military in the town of Haditha. Are you happy that you are not Secretary of State right now?

Albright: It is a mixed feeling. Things are really in bad shape. If the Democrats were still in power, they wouldn't be in this kind of shape. On the one hand, it's a little bit of a relief not having to deal with it. On the other, though, it is somewhat frustrating having to watch it. If you really care about the foreign policy of your country and spent a lot of time taking care of it, being confronted with the question as to how long it will now take the US to regain its reputation abroad is difficult. I am afraid it's going to take awhile. Reputations of countries are very hard to put back together.
...
http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,419417,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. It was stupid to do it in the first place.
Better planning might have made it less disastrous, but it would not have made it NOT disastrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Just throw a few sanctions at them
That would be worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. No
it was from start to finish (whenever that occurs) an illegal operation which should never have been undertaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Like many others here at the DU,
I was NEVER in favor of waging war against Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonerian Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I hope you also weren't in favor
of Albright's planning and execution of the besiegement and starvation of Iraq as Albright proudly planned and executed for at least 4 years.

This causes me to wonder about trying to rank the various mass murderers on planet earth. On one hand the republican cowboys seem nastier with all of their flashy "bring it on" and "dead or alive" bullshit. But, after 4 years and at least a trillion dollars of all out war, all they can show for it is about 100,000 dead at best.

Compare that with the 500,000 that Albright quietly boasted that she, Cristopher, and Clinton delivered to the War god when they were moving the chess pieces in the Grand Game--all without losing one precious US mass murdering pawn. Now that's some good planning for you.

So, who should get the #1 ranking for the meanest mass murdering cabal since the 1990's? the republican cowboys? or the yankee elites as represented by Albright, Christoper, and Clinton?

The same goes for the good old days when "the Greatest Generation" planned and executed "the Good War." We're used to hearing people rank Mao, Stalin, and Hitler (in various orders) in the top 3 mass murderer rankings based on their having murdered millions or tens of millions over the courses of their lifetime careers.

But, what if instead of using lifetime statistics, we ranked our mass murderers by how fast they could kill 100,000 people. Using this measure Roosevelt and Churchill leave Mao, Stalin, and Hitler in the dust as Mao, Stalin, and Hitler couldn't even dream of killing 100,000 people in just a few seconds or a few days as Roosevelt and Churchill did at Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks for pointing that out.
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 01:34 PM by cliss
Actually, I wasn't aware of all the dirty deeds they were up to. I was aware that the sanctions imposed on the Iraqis really created a lot of hardships for them.

Good points, all.

Welcome to the DU, by the way:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. what would have been your alternative
for dealing with Iraq during the Clinton years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonerian Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. "Deal" with Iraq?
Do you mean besides promising to bring to justice those who planned and executed Colin Powell's Highway of Death massacre? Perhaps you're referring to the fact that the issue of war crimes against Iraq needed to be dealt with and reparations offered regarding the US's bombing of water treatment and sewage facilities and the resulting death and disease.

I'm listening to Greg Palast right now on Sirus Left's Mike Feder. He's talking about how James Baker, OPEC, and Big Oil believed that Hussein needed to be dealt with because he was "jerking" the oil markets and could have single-handedly destroyed the OPEC/Big Oil cartel if he wanted to. Is this why you believe Iraq needed to be dealt with?

Why do you assume that Iraq or any other country must be "dealt" with? What's wrong with the US facing up to its crimes, begging forgiveness from its victims, and pledging to re-pay its victims until they're sufficiently compensated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. what I expected
are you really whacko fringe leftist

or just a troll pretending to be one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonerian Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. By calling for the US
to take responsibility for bombing water treatment and sewage plants, I clearly am fringe and wacko by any statistical measure of the current US population. I'm certainly not a "leftist," although most "rightists" and moderates that I deal with call me that. In their narrow minds I must be a "leftist."

I suppose it would also stand to reason then, that self-described "leftists" would consider the idea of taking responsibility for one's mass murders some sort of right-wing parody of left-ism. I guess the idea of paying for one's crimes frightens United States of Americans up and down the spectrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. with a world view is as narrow and blinkered
as any right winger's, you make the left look like a bunch of nutjobs with your constant stream of hate America first - blame America for everything that's wrong with the world brand of self loathing. The world is a big place, filled with lots of people, some of whom aren't very nice.

Grow up and do some critical thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. It Wasn't Planned At All
Who needs plans when you have Faith and God is on Your Side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC