Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Few Men Found to Get HIV in Prison - popular assumptions refuted (CDC)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:08 PM
Original message
Few Men Found to Get HIV in Prison - popular assumptions refuted (CDC)
Interesting article. It's making the rounds in Public Health circles.

Few Men Found to Get HIV in Prison

By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 21, 2006; A09

Although male prisoners have a relatively high rate of HIV infection, very few of them acquire the virus while behind bars, according to a federal study that is the largest and longest one to look at the issue.

About 90 percent of HIV-positive men in Georgia's prison system -- the nation's fifth largest -- were infected before they arrived, the study found. Over a 17-year period, 88 men became infected in prison by the virus that causes AIDS, chiefly through same-sex intercourse. Georgia prisons currently house about 45,000 men.

The study, published yesterday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, refutes the widespread impression that U.S. prisons are hotbeds of the AIDS epidemic, and that incarceration contributes directly to the high rate of HIV among black men, who make up the majority of male prisoners in many states.

The study revealed a surprising and unexplored aspect of HIV infection in prisoners. Of the men who became infected behind bars and acknowledged having gay sex there, half reported that their partners were prison staff members, not other inmates. Whether guards were the source infection, or became infected themselves, in any of those liaisons is unknown.

Nearly three-quarters of inmates who reported having had sex with other men described it as consensual. Nearly one-third of those said they used condoms or an improvised protective method such as rubber gloves or plastic wrap.

"Both inmates and society as a whole have long held the belief that transmission is common among prison inmates. The interesting thing about this study is that it directly contradicts that," he (Richard Tewksbury, a professor of justice administration at the University of Louisville) said.

<more>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/20/AR2006042001868_pf.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actual study
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5515a1.htm?s_cid=mm5515a1_e

My only beef is the study is one prison system with a small sample and certainly not a case study be to draw any larger conclusions from, which I'm sure the MSM media will endlessly claim now as fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the CDC link. As I read, it's a 17 year study/45,000 inmates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. *sigh* - sadly my cynicism has grown so high per
any report/study put out by a govt agency under bush. Too many times we have learned about political hacks forcing the alteration reports. This study could be true, but until we know that there is an end to the politicization of science and research by the Bushco - I can't put any stock into any govt study. Sad state of affairs - no way to tell what is legitimate research and what is politicized bs.

H#ll - Congress tried to stop the practice of political inteference by requiring studies to go to Congress (you know, oversight) without political interefence into content - and Bush signed this into law... and then inserted into the record an extraconstitutional "signing statement" stating that he would comply or not comply as suited his administration's ability to 'conduct business'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC