Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Georgia Lawmakers OK Public School Bible Classes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:52 PM
Original message
Georgia Lawmakers OK Public School Bible Classes
(your tax dollars at work for bush&gang)

more:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyid=2006-03-28T175349Z_01_N28210585_RTRUKOC_0_US-RELIGION-GEORGIA.xml

Georgia lawmakers OK public school Bible classes
Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:54 PM ET

By Karen Jacobs
ATLANTA (Reuters) - Georgia lawmakers have approved a measure to fund elective Bible courses in public schools, raising concern among civil liberties groups the classes could violate the U.S. constitutional separation of church and state.

Under the bill, which now goes to Gov. Sonny Perdue for his signature, the State Board of Education would have to adopt curricula for two classes on the history and literature of the Old and New Testaments. School districts would then have the option of offering the courses.

The measure's enactment threatens to again inflame the debate between secularists and the religious right that has been invigorated under President George W. Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. They want it to "inflame the debate
between secularists and the religious right". That's the whole point, it's a wedge issue.

I'm wondering if it wouldn't be best to leave this one alone as long as they really stick to just the history and literature aspect of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It's absurd and it's taking away from orchestra or chemistry or
some real class about real things in the real world that other students deserve to get to attend. When you say that bible study has to occur outside of History of Literature or Ancient Comparative Literature, you're teaching religion, not literature or history.

It's taking resources away from other students who need a chance at real education for dealing with the real world, and it will most certainly be blatantly abused.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. so if I understand this correctly
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 05:05 PM by sui generis
It's not enough to keep your miserable lives going to church three times a week, bible study on Saturday and church again on Sunday, but you have to bump curricula for students who don't give a flipping shit about the bible and pay for someone to teach the bible to these morons?

Pardon my anger, but I would volunteer to teach that class. Happily.

Kiddos, the Bible is a fairy tale book, and not the good kind. God is a petty and jealous tyrant who does parlor tricks like spinning flaming swords and invisible writing on the walls and setting bushes on fire and speaking through them.

He smotes and smites and generally has a vile and unforgiving temper all through the first testament, and keeps testing everyone's faith relentlessly and murdering their wives and children when they slip up. Nice guy that one. Then he conjurs up a heart, has a miracle spewing baby who walks on water and cures acne and then "sacrifices" his only son in a pretty gruesome Act II by torturing him to death, and then killing him some more, for your sins of spanking your monkey last Sunday (to that Maxim cover that the godless Skinner republished on that godless website DU) while wifey was out getting the groceries.

Then for 2000 years he just hangs out and watches as everyone murders everyone else in the name of goodness while the "devil" just sits back and shakes his head thinking, "I couldn't have done it better if I had in fact been evil instead of just questioning all this crap".

Well that would get us through the first day. I'd just take questions for the rest of the school year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. I sincerely hope that a Muslim group in Georgia demands Koran study
And a Buddhist group demands study of the Pali canon.
And a Wiccan group demands study of "God of the Witches."
And a Hindu group demands study of the Mahabarata and Vedas.
And...
And...
And...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. agree-it's only fair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonkronz2003 Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's the big deal....
This shouldn't be an issue-the bible is worth studying form a literary and historical perspective. But, with that said, shouldn't the koran also be studied? How about the gnostic bibles? What about non-christian non-judaic literature. Seems that this should all be put into a comparitive religions class.

But that's not the agenda-it's a deep wedge issue to drive the christofacist's point of view into the mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have no objection to the Bible being taught
along with Humanism, Buddhism, the Koran, the Kabbalah, the Baghad Vita, Scientology, etc. etc.

A course on Comparative Religions, as an elective, is acceptable.

This will be challenged at first opportunity in court - and should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC