The contract has drawn sharp criticism from lawmakers who fear the president's move will be a political liability to their reelection bids.
By Janet Hook, Times Staff Writer
February 26 2006
WASHINGTON — Republicans' raucous rebellion against the White House on a port management deal has proved to be a crucial juncture in George W. Bush's presidency, signaling how dramatically his vise-like grip on the GOP has been loosened in his second term.
It also serves to underscore a fundamental political reality: Most Republicans in Congress are up for reelection in 2006, and Bush is not.
For the first time, Bush is facing pointed, emotional opposition across the GOP political spectrum. From senior leaders to backbenchers, congressional Republicans are showing a rare willingness to go public with their criticism of his administration's decision to allow an Arab company to manage terminals at several large U.S. ports — a remarkable development for a White House notoriously intolerant of dissent.
A key question is whether the port imbroglio is an episode that will pass without lasting political effect or whether it will permanently damage Bush's position in the party, especially among the conservative base that sparked the opposition to the deal.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-portassess26feb26,1,2206760.story?coll=la-headlines-nation