Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

THOMAS OLIPHANT A credibility chasm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:12 AM
Original message
THOMAS OLIPHANT A credibility chasm


THOMAS OLIPHANT
A credibility chasm

WASHINGTON
FOUR SPEECHES.
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/12/15/a_credibility_chasm/
Wow.

The latest cycle of orations from President Bush has produced a bump in his job approval ratings for handling the war in Iraq -- from about 35 percent to about 39 percent -- a bump so tiny that it may not have occurred at all, given the margins of statistical error in opinion polls.


The baloney from our government and president celebrated democracy and consensus across the regions and sects. The reality was division, actually enshrined in the constitution under which Iraqis will vote this week. Rather than heal the society, the constitution cemented its divisions in place. One of the dirty little secrets that his advisers leak to the press all the time, a secret Bush seems incapable of acknowledging, is that there is nothing to prevent virtual independence in the Kurdish North and virtual theocracy in the South --a recipe for chaos in and around Baghdad. The other dirty little secret is that the first task of whatever government is formed will be to figure out a way to change this wretched constitution so there remains at least a dim possibility of allowing freedom to exist under its amended provisions.

The president has also continued to be dishonest about what is about to happen in Iraq in terms of the American armed forces. The truth is that after a brief interval, the more than 20,000 extra troops brought in for the run-up to the elections will be withdrawn.

In other words, though Bush would insist that everything depends on how the war is going, the United States has plans to remove about one-third of its forces over the next three or four months. Just for the record, that is not any different from what the supposedly antiwar Democratic congressman, Jack Murtha of Pennsylvania, has said should happen over basically the same period.


And that's why his poll numbers hardly budge. We can hear him, but most of us have learned not to believe him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Odd.
I don't recall major news reports of Bushs ratings being around 35%. Little hidden, tucked into the back pages reports yes. But major news stories were quoting polls of 39 and 40%.

Yet, now that Bush has "bounced back" to those same 39 and 40 results, major news stories claim that's up from the under-reported 35's.

I call BS. Maybe his speeches created a momentary lull in his drop, but there IS NO BOUNCE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good Article by Oliphant
Why more reporters do not mention gas prices as the sole reason for a bump in approval ratings is beyond me. I don't believe I heard one credible person mention gas prices!!! Our press has sold out for access to power and to keep corporate masters pleased. Sick I say just sick!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC