Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Creepy Miers article) A Love that was benched by their careers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 03:30 AM
Original message
Creepy Miers article) A Love that was benched by their careers
This has got to be one of the most unusual articles about a Supreme Court nominee, ever. Cue up the Love Story theme if you decide to read the whole thing!
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-couple8oct08,0,5228343.story?coll=la-home-headlines

HOUSTON — He was a country boy who grew up on a wheat farm, she a city girl who played on her high school tennis team.

The lives of Nathan Hecht and Harriet E. Miers began to intertwine in the early 1970s, shortly after they finished law school at Southern Methodist University in Dallas.

Soon, they were rising stars at the same law firm, and their lives seemed to be converging in every way. They were earnest, ambitious and increasingly affectionate with one another. Friends thought they would get married.

Instead, for 30 years, Hecht and Miers — President Bush's Supreme Court nominee — have nurtured a kinship that has entranced and confounded their closest friends. They are traditional conservatives content in a modern, nontraditional relationship, one that leaves plenty of time for their true love, their work, to take center stage....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like PR department desperation in motion to me.
If they'd really been that much in love with each other, they wouldn't have chosen the lives that they did. Looks like Bush's PR Department is getting desperate over the non-compliance from within their own ranks so they pulled out an old romance story hoping that it would appeal to their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKDem08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah, right, like anyone is going to fall for that
is it possible for the polls to decline to negative values?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. You are severely misunderestimating the credibility factor of your
average bush**bot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. A story about the mating rituals of cockroaches. How romantic.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Even the worse Harlequin Romance Novel doesn't read that bad...
what does this have to do with qualifications for a Supreme Court nominee. What are they hiding or trying to convey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Duh
They're trying to prove she's not one 'a them evil lesbians! In their binary brains, a 60 year old never married woman with a career = lesbian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not all 60 year old never married women with careers are...
lesbians. I don't know whether or not Miers is and I don't really care. I only care if she is qualified and what her views are on many issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. And they seem to just IGNORE statistics--singleness is increasing
"The postponement of marriage has led to a substantial increase in the
proportion of young, never-married adults," said Jason Fields, author of
America's Families and Living Arrangements: March 2000. "For example, in
the past three decades, the proportion of those who had never married
doubled for women ages 20 to 24, from 36 percent to 73 percent, and more
than tripled for women ages 30 to 34, from 6 percent to 22 percent."

Other findings:

- In the 30 years from 1970 to 2000, the average size of the nation's
households decreased from 3.14 to 2.62 persons.

- In 2000, 10 percent of the nation's households contained five or
more persons, down from 21 percent in 1970; 59 percent of households
had one or two persons in 2000, up from 46 percent in 1970.

- The proportion of households consisting of one person living alone
increased from 17 percent in 1970 to 26 percent in 2000.


http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2001/cb01-113.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. That was precisely my first thought
The old pandering gender stuff at work? Or the employment of the old pandering gender stuff to distract from the lack of qualifications? And then, anyone who COMPLAINS is being MEAN???

I was shocked at the PAPER that printed this tripe, frankly--I thought they were a bit better than this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. And the American people respond!
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. SHE WITHDREW! did she not? Or did I dream that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. nope. wishful thinking. Another nominee withdrew because of Abramoff
silly, silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wonder of Falwell, Dobson etc will thing it's "romantic" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. so I should assume, since they are good "Christians" and "live what they
preach" that they are both virgins and has subsumed their passion into "good works"?

yeah, right......

:puke:

There is something wrong with people who don't/can't make a committment to another, who choose to live alone without the willingness to love.

Dress it up however you want, but that article is a portrait of broken people whose emotional lives are crippled. While some people do chose to live single their whole lives, it isn't a testiment to emotional health and compassion.

just saying.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, that's a bit of a broad brush
I had a much older female relative whose mantra was "LIVE ALONE...and LIKE IT!!" She enjoyed her social life throughout the years, was never in short supply of ardent suitors, but nothing made her happier than to take off her girdle (they wore them in those days), put on a housecoat, have a cuppa tea, and read a good book or watch TV...ALONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I'm not arguing that lots of folks do better alone and do it well. but
this article didn't sound like a vision of such folks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. True, it sounds like...dare I say...PROPAGANDA nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Some of us prefer to live alone
because we don't like LIVING with other people. At least that's it for me. My place is MINE. People can visit but they have to leave. Eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Theory
When I was in grad school, I knew a woman student who was hopelessly in love with an obviously gay man. She told everyone that there was no one for her but him.

They were constant companions in a buddy sort of way and went to events together. She acted as a willing "beard" for the man for several years.

Could the relationship described in the article be something similar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Who knows? I just found it a bit creepy, this sort of tabloidy
true romance type story about a potential SUPREME COURT JUSTICE. It just seems...UNSEEMLY to me.

But I suppose there's no other story, and that could be the reason--no landmark rulings from her circuit court bench, because she has never sat on one, no fiery defenses in courtrooms, because there's none o' that either...but I guess she schmoozes good and makes a mean cuppa coffee. She also helped the monkey cut brush, and handed him the BIN LADIN DETERMINED memo on 6 Aug 01. How do you make a feel good story out of that??

Enter, the ex-boyfriend, I guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC