Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Filibuster right saved?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 11:28 AM
Original message
Filibuster right saved?
http://www.wvgazette.com/section/Editorials/200505233

THANK heaven, a last-minute compromise — negotiated partly by Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va. — prevented majority Republicans in the U.S. Senate from ending the right of minority senators to block some presidential nominations through nonstop oratory.

If Republicans had proceeded today to ban filibusters, as planned, the majority GOP would have gained greater domination of Washington and the U.S. government. Few checks would have remained in the checks-and-balances system. President Bush might have been free to take extreme actions, and outnumbered Democrats in Congress would have little power to resist.

Unfortunately, the Monday night compromise consists mostly of Democrats agreeing to shut off debate, allowing some of Bush’s unfit nominees to become U.S. judges.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. filibuster right postponed
This will come up again the first time Dems try to use filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrasybulus Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. What's to prevent Frist
from simply scheduling a vote for one of the judges that were excluded from the agreement?

Then we are back at square one and something would have to give.

Hoping for a Republican implosion as the rabid right goes after the compromisers.

Maybe they force Chaffee into pulling a Jeffords. Or maybe not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. There was NO CHANGE in the Senate rules. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC