Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Heritage Foundation trashes Wexler's SS fix

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
zoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 08:27 PM
Original message
Heritage Foundation trashes Wexler's SS fix
From the Heritage Foundation:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/SocialSecurity/wm747.cfm

They praised Representative Robert Wexler (D-FL) his plan to improve Social Security solvency. Then trashed him in the second paragraph by trashing his "fix".

His plan would increase taxes on all wages above $90,000 by six percent. This tax increase would impact millions of Americans, slow the economy, and cost jobs. Specifically, the Wexler tax increase would:

„X Directly raise taxes on 9.8 million American workers;
„X Raise taxes for 3.6 million workers over the age of 50¡Xjust when they¡¦re trying to steer towards retirement;
„X Raise taxes for 3 million small-business owners;
„X Slow the growth of the economy, shaving an average of $33 billion per year off of the Gross Domestic Product over the fist ten years of the tax increase;
„X Reduce total employment by an average of 340,000 jobs per year over the first ten-year period; and
„X Make Social Security a worse deal for millions of Americans.


Lets see if I got this right. Clinton can raise taxes on the rich and we see 20 million new jobs; a budget surplus; and we see eight of the most prosperous years in the history of the nation but let Wexler offer the same fix and it does just the opposite? go figure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh kiss my butt Heritage Foundation
I'm above $90K - and I will gladly pay to preserve social insurance (social security is "social insurance" not an "investment vehicle" - Economics of Labor Relations and Employment for Dummies 101)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Neocons cannot even keep it straight from one paragraph to another.
What a bunch of phonies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC