Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA Reverses Key Lead Abatement Rule: Children at Risk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:12 AM
Original message
EPA Reverses Key Lead Abatement Rule: Children at Risk
***************************************
BUSHGREENWATCH
Tracking the Bush Administration's Environmental Misdeeds
http://www.bushgreenwatch.org
***************************************

March 22, 2005

EPA REVERSES KEY LEAD ABATEMENT RULE: CHILDREN AT RISK

"There is more than a little irony here. The EPA--the same
agency that took lead out of gasoline--is now weakening any
attempt to eliminate the most important remaining source of lead
poisoning: household paint and dust."

So spoke Dr. Herbert L. Needleman, one of the nation's premiere
experts on the impact of lead poisoning on children. Dr.
Needleman spoke with BushGreenwatch upon learning that the
Environmental Protection Agency has quietly removed the
requirement that only certified contractors using workers
trained in lead-safe practices may do remodeling or renovation
in buildings constructed before 1978.

According to internal briefings obtained by Public Employees for
Environmental Responsibility (PEER), President Bush's new EPA
Administrator, Stephen Johnson, has scrapped that requirement in
favor of a voluntary approach.<1> Dr. Needleman described the
voluntary approach as "a strategy that has never worked in lead
abatement."

An EPA spokesperson said the decision to switch to a voluntary
approach was not made by Administrator Johnson, but would not
say who did.

Citing EPA's removal of lead from gasoline as "the most
important public health achievement of the past 30 years," Dr.
Needleman said the one important remaining source is lead in the
paint and dust of older housing. EPA estimates that some 1.4
million children under age 7--the prime developmental
years--live in households where they are at risk of lead
exposure.

Addressing the damage lead poisoning causes to children's brain
development, Dr. Needleman, a professor of psychiatry and
pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,
and other physicians and lead investigators said that "as
pediatricians who have seen the tragic consequences of lead
poisoning close up, we are outraged at the quiet abandonment of
a program that could eliminate this avoidable epidemic." <2>

The Centers for Disease Control estimates that 434,000 U.S.
children under the age of 5 currently have blood-lead levels
linked with serious developmental health consequences. Most of
them live in the inner cities.

"The Bush Administration has walked away from the national goal
of eliminating childhood lead poisoning by 2010," said PEER
Executive Director Jeff Ruch. Ruch said PEER is working to
organize a coalition to press for implementation of the
"long-stalled regulations," and, if neccessary, take the issue
to court.

###

SOURCES:
<1> PEER press release, Mar. 14, 2005,
http://ga3.org/ct/J7zACmM1BmxH/.
<2> Letter to Journalists. (Journalists may contact
BushGreenwatch.org for a copy of the letter.)

***************************************
:: TELL A FRIEND ABOUT BUSHGREENWATCH
http://ga3.org/ct/FpzACmM1Bmx0/

:: READ BACK ISSUES
http://ga3.org/ct/-dzACmM1BmxP/
***************************************

BushGreenwatch
1320 18th Street NW 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 463-6670
Web site comments: info@bushgreenwatch.org

Copyright (c) 2003 Environmental Media Services
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Bush administration summed up in one paragraph
An EPA spokesperson said the decision to switch to a voluntary
approach was not made by Administrator Johnson, but would not
say who did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Lead makes people stupefied and dulled, therefore the Busheviks
are all in favor...

Imperial EPA should not be compared with Free America's EPA.

Imperial EPA has only one purpose, protect the Bushevik Corparations and other Imperial Cronies.

The byproducts of that are an agency which lies, witholds information, and is run by people who are ideologically 100% against environental regulation (except for the bullshit lip service deceiving the Imperial Subjects of Amerika requires).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was reading recently that paint before 1992 had mercury in it.
Would have similar problems as the lead situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC