Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intellectual Cowboy on a World Bank Crusade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 07:04 PM
Original message
Intellectual Cowboy on a World Bank Crusade
Any American who's spent more than a few days abroad in the last two years has faced the question, more often earnest than accusatory: Exactly why was it that the United States went to war in Iraq? It's an apt question on the second anniversary of the invasion -- and at a time when U.S. President George W. Bush's nomination of Paul Wolfowitz, the intellectual agent behind the Iraq war, as World Bank head has set off storms of protest. "Old Europe" is deeply distressed, as are the very Third World countries the World Bank professes to serve.

There is a terrific irony in the fact that Wolfowitz, facing an unprecedented summons to explain his fitness for the job to the bank's European board members, has defended himself by proclaiming that he is no Bush yes-man. It is precisely his independence of mind -- to use a neutral phrase -- that makes the nomination most troubling.

In 1992, under President George H.W. Bush, Wolfowitz drafted the infamous Defense Planning Guidance document that asserted unlimited U.S. latitude to take pre-emptive military action on ideological grounds, using, if need be, chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. He was so intent on invading Iraq that in the days following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, he argued that the United States ought to retaliate there instead of in Afghanistan. The disastrous results of Wolfowitz's ideologically blindered arguments when the United States did take on Baghdad -- such as the insistence that Iraqis would greet U.S. Marines with flowers -- have been all too evident.

What was new in Iraq was the use of unilateral military action in the name of democracy despite overwhelming worldwide opposition. There is good reason to fear that Wolfowitz's high-flying idealism could steer the World Bank on a similarly destructive course. A cynic preaching liberation can be reasoned with: Simply appeal to his self-interest. The more dangerous opponent is the one who believes what he says.

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2005/03/22/009.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC