Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's Official! "Iraq Coverage Wasn't Biased"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 05:52 PM
Original message
It's Official! "Iraq Coverage Wasn't Biased"
whew, i was gettin' nervous there for a minute

It's Official! "Iraq Coverage Wasn't Biased"

The Irony Ombudsman appears to have taken the day off at most US news outlets as editors have jumped on a story from the AP entitled, "Report: Iraq Coverage Wasn't Biased."

As the notion of an "objective" and "balanced" commercial press in the United States continues to go the way of the Abominable Snowman, the Loch Ness Monster and Iraqi WMD, it is hardly surprising that editors around the country salivate at the sight of a story that appears to confirm the existence of these strange, elusive phenomena (objectivity and balance, not WMD). The irony is that in their desperation to run any remotely positive story about the news media, these editors have exhibited, as they did numerous times over Iraq, an inability to sniff out a fishy story.

The AP story in question was based upon the results of a study produced by the Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ) -- an institute affiliated with the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism -- and funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts. For the study, over 2000 news stories from television, newspapers and websites were examined and coded. The particular result of the study that led to the AP headline in question ("Report: Iraq Coverage wasn't Biased") -- a headline carried verbatim by a large number of news outlets -- was that while 25% of all stories on the war on Iraq were "Negative," 20% were "Positive." In general, according to the AP story, the positive and negative stories balanced each other out. Accusations of bias, therefore, were unfounded.

As with most academic research, however, the devil is in the details, and this particular study is no exception. Three examples make the point:

more@link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, propaganda has become more efficient from 60 yrs. ago
Instead of the state directly controlling the news media, corporations do instead. It's a more efficient model compared to the corporatism that overtook Italy and Germany before WW2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Corporate and Entertainment Media{CAEM}
dazzle us with tall tales,millionaire salaries,$500 hair -dos and .05 cent mentality...

Look for more sex stories of the stars when bush gets ready to make Iran or Syria into glass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Iraq's Coverage Wasn't Coverage!
The totally content-free bullshit that's been filling the papers and airwaves since Reagan has crowded out any factual reporting to the blogs, where the Freepers do their best to bury it under more bullshit. Truth will out. It's just going to take more time than I think we have to spare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC