Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Wants Line-Item Veto to Be Revived

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 08:56 AM
Original message
Bush Wants Line-Item Veto to Be Revived
WASHINGTON -- Six years after the Supreme Court took away the president's ability to veto specific parts of legislation, President Bush is asking Congress to bring back the line-item veto to let him make precision strikes against projects and tax provisions he doesn't like.

At a news conference after his re-election, Bush said he wanted a line-item veto that "passed constitutional muster," explaining it would help him work with lawmakers "to make sure that we're able to maintain budget discipline."

Presidents have been saying similar words since the first line-item veto proposal was introduced in the 1870s. It wasn't until 1996, when the new Republican majority in the House made the tool part of its "Contract With America," that Congress responded.

President Clinton happily signed the legislation, and in 1997 he used his new power 82 times to negate specific projects in larger spending bills. Congress overrode his veto 38 times, although it still resulted in savings of almost $2 billion.

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-second-term-line-item-veto,0,1004226.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Duh
Kind of hard to do since the SC declared it unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
da_chimperor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He didn't get that memo
Or he DID, but he didn't read it. What a moran . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frumious B Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Don't flame me...
Edited on Wed Nov-10-04 09:04 AM by Frumious B
But I actually think that a Constitutional amendment granting the President a line/item veto and also mandating a balanced federal budget would be a fantastic idea no matter what party originates it. There's no way the Founding Fathers could have envisioned the massive, pork laden spending bills that we have today.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Pork-laden spending bills...

...pay for a lot of things people want and need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Here's what will happen...........................................
Democrats will agree to $100 trillion in tax cuts for the rich
if the Republicans agree to spend an extra $1million on education.

Then when Bush goes to sign it, he just crossed out the line with the education funding.


wallahhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Exactly. Rove/Cheney realised some DEMS might have grown spines
and they are not taking any chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. The SC only did that because Clinton DARED to use it
See the Repubs think it is only for their guys to use that is why they want to revive it again. When the Dems win in 2008 some RW job will challenge it and it will be ruled unconstitutional again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. A likely story...
if he'd vetoed a single spending bill during his past 4 years, this might have more credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Bingo
Bush is just trying to cover the fact that HE DOES NOT VETO ANYTHING by saying "if I had a line item veto, I could review items".

Well, you have to take the stamp out of your hand and open your eyes to read the items before you in order to veto anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Review things? The chimp? His daily briefings don't get reviewed
or he would have single handedly wrestled control of those planes from the hijackers on 9-11 </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. We can't give him any more power
My god! Bush needs LESS power, not more! Next he will attempt to amend the constitution to allow for a six-term president!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greylyn58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Cheney Has Already
brought that subject up in an Esquire magazine article that is coming out. He wants Bush to have 8 years instead of 4.

GOD...could you imagine!

:mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
74dodgedart Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. We need to do something about the budgeting process
Maybe if Bush would veto a spending bill every now and then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm sure the Dems will be happy to just roll over...
...and let him have that, too. Hopefully since the SC declared it unconstitutional, there will be nothing he can do but the SC being the partisan bu$h butt-kissing useless kangaroo court they are, he'll probably get it - along with anything else he asks them to do. I notice bu$h has been doing a lot of 'asking the supreme court' to do this or that lately. His arrogant ass acts like he thinks they are there specifically to do HIS bidding. They are his American Taliban...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Bush and "budget discipline"?... Oh please. Another power grab
by the poser-in-chief initiated under false pretenses. It's becoming
rather Orwellian.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC