Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel to question US Presidents (911)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:05 AM
Original message
Panel to question US Presidents (911)
Heard this on the radio on the way in. What are the chances that his handlers will ever let w* testify? I'm thinking, nil.

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_797665.html

--snip--

"George W Bush and Bill Clinton are expected to appear before an independent commission investigating the September 11 attacks.

The US President and his predecessor will have to explain what they knew about al-Qaida terror plots, and what was done to combat them.

The panel is looking at what might have been done to prevent the 2001 terror strikes in New York and Washington."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rule #1 for Bush family - NEVER be placed under oath.
They will never do it unless it's fixed 100% in their favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Interesting point when you consider
how many times they should have been placed under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. The tide has turned,
if they are talking about bush* or cheney or any of the other administration officials being questioned about 9-11, then the tide has really turned.

Bill Clinton would bury bush* with all the info that he and his administration has about terrorism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Loius Freeh should be questioned...wonder why he is quietly left alone?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can you imagine?
How lucid and intelligent Clinton would sound, explaining the steps he took to combat terrorism and protect America?

...And imagine * trying to talk about anything complicated off-book... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. They would never allow either to do this...
...for obvious reasons- both would implicate Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is great news.
Once Clinton starts talking, W's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. George isn't used to be held accountable
for ANYTHING

We'll see but isn't it odd that the Brits have already finished their investigation of the intel on the War on Iraq, NASA (sorry) had and investigation STARTED before all the parts had fallen to Earth, but it has been 21 months and no one here seems to concerned about what happened on 9/11. Ridiculous.

I don't know if he will tesitify but at least I would expect them to ask for the questions ahead of time and I doubt the media will press him to testify.

Plus with the WHOPPING $3 Million budget for the investigation and the already stated scope being "not to really get anyone in trouble" it looks like a whitewash with the "Blame Clinton" crowd and "Praise W for his leadersip" numbskulls issuing a statement that is pre-determined. Oh and they will blame it all on the CIA so as to imply the Iraq intel LIES were their fault too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. locking--dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC