Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: In Battle for No. 2 Spot, Focus Remains at the Top

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 10:39 PM
Original message
NYT: In Battle for No. 2 Spot, Focus Remains at the Top
(snip)

With the stakes so high, Mr. Cheney is spending a long weekend preparing at his home in Jackson, Wyo., where aides have assembled a mock-up of the debate setting. Mr. Cheney has been practicing with Representative Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio, playing the part of Mr. Edwards.

(snip)

Mr. Edwards, who faces the first one-on-one televised debate of his career, is at a resort in Chautauqua, N.Y., with his family and staff. He has been facing off against Robert Barnett, a prominent Washington lawyer who has been playing the part of Mr. Cheney. Like the successful courtroom lawyer that he was, Mr. Edwards is spending lots of time boning up on his case by reading about policy, consulting an array of advisers and researchers and reviewing Mr. Cheney's record and past statements on foreign and domestic affairs.

To clear his head, his campaign manager, Peter Scher, said, he has been taking his ritual runs of four to six miles each day.

Strategists on both sides say the format - both men seated at a table with the moderator, Gwen Ifill of PBS - plays to Mr. Cheney's strengths. When Mr. Lieberman's team studied Mr. Cheney before their debate in 2000, they concluded that Mr. Cheney, never an exuberant presence, was not a great communicator from behind a lectern in front of a big audience, but was very strong in more conversational settings like Sunday morning news programs, where he came across as strong and focused.

Mr. Edwards's advisers said that he had chafed at the format, preferring a more open setting that would allow him to use his stage skills to his advantage, but that the campaign relented because it believed fighting that point might have damaged negotiations to get Mr. Kerry three debates with President Bush instead of two.

more…
http://nytimes.com/2004/10/04/politics/campaign/04veep.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sitting down to debate?
What a crock! Probably to hide the power cord to Dickie's pacemaker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wouldn't it be great if Dickie told Edwards to go f**k himself?
Still, Mr. Cheney's aides say they expect Mr. Edwards to come at him aggressively, seeking to get under his skin the same way Mr. Kerry did with Mr. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. At least Sen. Edwards doesn't have to worry about anyone feeling
sorry for Cheney when he whoops his ass. I honestly believe Sen. Kerry had to be careful not to go too far with Bush* in case he helped him pick up a sympathy vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. A Cheney adviser said:
"Cheney will bring 9/11 back into the discussion in a very significant way, which was something that somehow seemed left out of the discussion on Thursday night."

Well, Bush left it out - because he's done so little to fix up security since. Kerry was willing to talk about money for first responders, and tightening up port security. If Cheney brings it up again, he runs the risk of reminding people that for two and a half years, the Republicans' focus has been on a country that was no threat to the USA - just to Halliburton's profits. So what will the 'security moms' think about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC