freely if this is true. They may be willing to widen the band just a tad, but they don't appear to be stupid.
I'm afraid that if they try another Plaza Accord type of fix, folks will bail out of the buck in droves this time around. Interest rates might have to go pretty dang high to get them back this time. Couple of articles from last year.
A Second Plaza Accord?
http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/crisis/2003/09plazaaccord.htmsnip>
The so-called twin deficits, trade and fiscal, are a near duplicate of the conditions that led to the Plaza Accord. In September 1985, the U.S., U.K., France, Germany and Japan sat down to reengineer the world's main exchange rates. That agreement saw the dollar fall by half against other major currencies. The result set in place the conditions that caused the Japanese bubble to expand and burst, damaging that economy for more than a decade.
Their goal was to stimulate demand outside the U.S. -- and most particularly in Japan -- to help the world's largest economy reduce its dangerous imbalances. In that they were successful: in real terms, growth in Japanese imports rose from an average of 1.6 percent a year in 1983-85 to 11.3 percent in 1986-88. At the same time, U.S. imports slowed, from 14.5 percent per annum to 6.1 percent a year. One side effect of this tinkering was to drive down inflation in the then-European Economic Community (now the EU) from 5.9 percent a year in the three years prior to the Plaza Accords to just 2.8 percent. Germany and Japan ran a real risk of deflation in the process, as their average annual rates of household inflation slowed to just 0.4 percent and 0.6 percent, respectively, in 1986-88.
If any of this sounds familiar, substitute China for Japan, and 2003 for 1985. The key factors are in place for a repeat of the disastrous (for Japan) Plaza Accord. The U.S. is feeling tough and aggressive; the economy is out of kilter; unemployment is high and rising; the budget has more red ink than a paint factory; and a single Asian nation is being set up to take the blame. It looks like 1985 all over again.
The differences, however, are critical. First, Chinese imports rose nearly 43 percent in the first seven months of this year and more than 20 percent per annum in the previous four years. This is no under-performer. Second, consumer prices have fallen in three of the past five years, and even when rising have not topped 1 percent since 1997. A sharp appreciation of the renminbi would drive China back into deflation. Third, China is far poorer than Japan was in the mid-1980s, and cannot afford to take the risks associated with exchange rate manipulation. The country needs to create tens of millions of jobs every year, and the star performer is exports.
If Japan's mature financial institutions and exporting corporations were devastated by the aftermath of the first Plaza Accord, imagine what would happen to China's far less developed banks and other financial sector companies. The implications for Hong Kong are severe as well.
more...
China Says `No' to
`Plaza Accord' Pressure
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3038plaza_accord.htmlAll the continued hullabaloo by the George W. Bush Administration about the fixed exchange rate of the Chinese currency, the renminbi, to the dollar, is getting nowhere. The Chinese remain determined that they are not going to give into the U.S. pressure for the currency to "float," by which Washington really means to drastically revalue the renminbi upward against the dollar.
China has drawn the historical lesson of what the 1985 "Plaza Accord" brought about, negotiated at that year's Group of Seven finance ministers meeting in New York: It destroyed the rapid growth of the Japanese economy after World War II. The Bush Administration, and some in Japan, want China to submit to the same sort of agreement now.
snip>
Although both European and Japanese officials had expressed doubts about this policy, the communiqué issued by the Group of Seven on Sept. 21, ended up calling for "more flexibility in exchange rates." It read: "In the context of exchange rates, we will strengthen the dialogue with other major economic areas to promote a smooth adjustment of international imbalances, based on market mechanisms." Previously, G-7 communiqués restrained themselves to calling for "monitoring" exchange rate movements, and for governments to "cooperate as appropriate."
In the next days, the Japanese yen and the South Korean won rose sharply against the U.S. dollar, to the highest levels in three years. This brought protests from Tokyo, which has already had to spend 9.03 trillion yen ($76.8 billion) this year, to try to control the yen's rise.
Snow tried to offer some bribes to the Chinese, who had a delegation in Dubai. He told the IMF meeting that the United States would be willing to consider a future admittance of China to the "elite" G-7 group of nations. "The issue of membership gets reviewed from time to time, and I think we are open to looking at the whole question," he said. China should take a sober look at the treatment that Russia receives as a sometime member of what is called the Group of Eight. At these occasional, expanded G-8 meetings, Russian delegates are allowed in (to sit at the "children's table").
But this was an empty gesture by Snow. As one well-informed City of London figure told EIR on Sept. 23, the dollar plunged because "everybody knows" how desperate the Bush Administration is about the U.S. economy. "I don't think the dollar going down has to do with the Dubai G-7 communiqué insisting on flexible exchange rates; there is something else going on," he said. "The financial world has latched onto a falling dollar, because of knowledge that has been picked up ... that the Administration clearly wants to abandon the strong dollar. It's fair to say, that they want to drive the dollar down, because of growing desperation about the American economy, as the election year approaches." China and Japan, he noted, are not going to change their policies just because of one communiqué.
more...