Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge: Reporter Must Testify in CIA Probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Sleepless In NY Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:46 PM
Original message
Judge: Reporter Must Testify in CIA Probe
Judge: Reporter Must Testify in CIA Probe


1 hour, 6 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - A federal judge has ruled that a New York Times reporter must testify before a grand jury as part of an investigation into the disclosure of an undercover CIA (news - web sites) operative's name.



In a decision made public Thursday, U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan rejected Judith Miller's claim that as a reporter she should not be compelled to testify about confidential sources.


Federal prosecutors are trying to find out who in the Bush administration leaked the identity of Valerie Plame, whose name was published by syndicated columnist Robert Novak on July 14, 2003. Novak cited two "senior administration officials" as his sources.


It can be a felony to leak the name of an undercover officer.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=ap/cia_leak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I bet judith is placing calls to the WH RIGHT NOW
Pass the popcorn, it will be enjoyable to see her squirm... and yes I wnat to know WHO uncovered a NOC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And some how there will be a delay.
Count down.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That Grand Jury room is so bugged,
I bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. How can a 'source' be confidential ...
... when she's not the one who broke the story (a 'source of what, then?) and the 'source' made himself known (and no longer anonymous) to several presstitutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe she could send Chalabi in her place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Who is "Scooter" Libby?
Libby also represented Marc Rich, a billionaire fugitive who reportedly
enjoys very close ties to Israeli intelligence and whose pardon by Bill
Clinton in the last days of his presidency became a major scandal, but
one quickly hushed by the incoming Bush administration. The fact that
Rich had renounced his US citizenship after his conviction for tax
evasion made the pardon - and Libby's efforts to obtain one - particularly
galling for many conservatives and made Libby himself a particularly
curious choice for Cheney's chief aide.


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/EJ01Aa01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. HE is the Chief of Staff
to the REAL PRESIDENT of the United States, the evil one, hte one nobody mentions truly... (Chenney)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
8.  a word of caution...
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 02:28 AM by JSJ
...the Bush WH is very adept at playing both ends- should it lose in it's efforts to shield documentia from discovery or should it's allies do the same, they'll have as a consolation prize- is that what it wanted all along?- the further erosion of the First Amendment's protection of sources.

*removed a word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC