Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right to vote vs. right to secrecy (Missouri's military email/fax voting)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:22 PM
Original message
Right to vote vs. right to secrecy (Missouri's military email/fax voting)
WASHINGTON — Missouri's recently announced plan to allow combat-zone soldiers to vote by e-mail has triggered concerns among voting experts over the secrecy and security of those ballots.

They said the system, which would use both e-mail and fax machines to get ballots from military service people in such places as Iraq and Afghanistan back to local election offices in Missouri, could be subject to hacking, viruses and other chicanery because they would not be encrypted.

“These machines are highly vulnerable,” said Barbara Simons, a member of the nonpartisan National Committee for Voting Integrity and a former president of the Association for Computing Machinery. “We could have a virus that changes ballots and then erases itself. It's certainly feasible technically.”

In addition, voting-rights advocates and other political experts said because the system required that ballots be identified by the voters' names for validation purposes, and because they were handled by others several steps along the way, that people serving in the military would lose the right to a secret ballot.

http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/politics/9600636.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why is this even being considered?
It is unf*ckingbelievable that a breach of security of this magnitude has even made it this far.

Missouri elections officials are morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Lets blame Matt Blunt
Who is MO's SOS. Also the head of BC04 camp here. He's doing everything he can to f*ck up this election. You're right, he is a moron (and running for gov).

And they'll allow voting by email, but won't allow early voting in St. Louis, even tho StL has money set aside for it.

I hate this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. thanks for the info
and welcome to DU

:bounce: :toast: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. it has been said by missouri reporters that this is crucial bush state
a state that he & cheney have visited i believe more than any other since they were selected

so it looks like that is why missouri is considering this voting travesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boredtodeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is OPTIONAL
I'm sorry, but the bottom line is simple - if the voter understands that his secrecy is lost by voting this way, why is it our problem?

Is anyone who is being asked to vote this way filing a lawsuit?

Is anyone who is being asked to vote this way voicing concern?

Aren't there other options, like mailing in your ballot, if you want secrecy and protection?

Folks, I don't see why we're worried about this. If you won't cast your ballot this way, why are we raising a stink?

I would never cast a ballot this way, but that's my choice. I consider this a really stupid idea, but that, too, is my choice.

Any second now, republicans are going to start screaming that we're trying to deny the military the right to vote.

This is no win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But the article says
that nearly one third of those overseas who requested Missouri absentee ballots for the 2000 elections didnt get them in time. Also this quote: "He was responding to the fact that the ballots of numerous service people who used the mail to vote in the Missouri primary last month didn't get counted because of delays and other problems."

I can see military personnel choosing email voting over mailing them in, can't you?

I'm raising a stink because I don't think its a good option. I'm getting ready to write LTTE and also email the SOS office. I'm not voting this by email, but you can bet emailing votes and possible bogus results sure could affect me (I live in MO).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boredtodeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, I can see it, but
That's the choice they'll be making. And, THAT, is my point.

These are voters who are of decision making age, participating in representative democracy. If they choose to vote this way, and it's legal, we have no right to deny them that choice.

Sure the choice sucks. Sure it's a damned stupid way to vote. But that is beside the point.

You're taking the approach the republicans took in Palm Beach County - if they're too stupid to avoid voting this way, then don't let them vote.

I think it's wrong for us to take that approach.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Pardon me?
You put quite a few words in my mouth. Where on earth did I insinuate they were too stupid to vote? GMAFB.

If a soldier requests an absentee ballot by mail but doesn't receive it in time, they are left with no choice but to vote by email. Its not a great choice, and there should be a better option, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Were you in the military?
If so, have you forgotten the pressure to conform and how not conforming can be used against you? GIs in Iraq and Afganistan have enough to worry about without wondering about whether or not their vote for the "right" candidate will be used against them re promotion, etc., by higherups in the chain of command.

Just because we don't have to vote this way doesn't mean we shouldn't be concerned. We should all be concerned whenever the right to vote secretly is threatened, especially by those who don't think twice about cheating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boredtodeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-04 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. See my post #8 n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC