Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: Army Turns to Private Guards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 12:51 AM
Original message
LAT: Army Turns to Private Guards
Edited on Thu Aug-12-04 12:52 AM by rmpalmer
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-guards12aug12,1,7162232,print.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Stretched thin by troop deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan and security needs at home, the Army has resorted to hiring private security guards to help protect dozens of American military bases.

To date, more than 4,300 private security officers have been put to work at 50 Army installations in the United States, according to Army documents obtained by The Times.

The work was awarded to four firms — two of which got the contracts without having to bid competitively. The contracts are worth as much as $1.24 billion.

The Army says the maneuver lets it free up more soldiers for military duty while quickly putting private guards in place to meet the need for additional security since the Sept. 11 attacks.

<snip>

Two five-year contracts worth as much as $1 billion went to two small Alaska Native firms with little previous security experience. The firms, which operate under special contracting laws enabling them to avoid competitive bidding, subcontracted part of the work to two of the country's largest security firms: Wackenhut Services Inc. and Vance Federal Security Services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how much the private guards make compared to the soldiers.
If it's any where near, or more, it's a travesty. That's one of the things soldiers do! Guard stuff! Hellooooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wonder if a fact story like this is aired on Whore TV or Whore radio?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. This article mentions a price
Saigon68 has talked about this several times. I couldn't believe it, but finally found a source.

****************************************************

Private security firms in war zones worry NGOs

In the cities and along the roads of Iraq and Afghanistan, thousands of private security contractors are profiting from work that has traditionally belonged to the military -- guarding convoys, patrolling neighbourhoods and even exchanging gunfire with local militia.

<cut>

Between 10,000 and 20,000 former military or security personnel are earning up to $1,500 a day working in Iraq and Afghanistan on a variety of tasks, including the armed protection of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, protecting the United Nation’s cash and supporting the Afghan elections.

http://www.alertnet.org/thefacts/reliefresources/109223838271.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The war zone mercs (Iraq etc) are VERY highly paid. I'm talking
about civilian rentaguards guarding U.S. military installations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. I worked at a facility located at a Navy Base for 10 years

For the first 6, we had a small marine detachment providing
for perimeter security, base patrol, and vehicle checkpoints.
They were great. Never a hassle with them.

The marines were removed and a private security company was
hired. What a bunch of idiots. They were handing out traffic
tickets right and left, and always hasseling the base civilian
work force. BTW, a traffic ticket on federal property is a
federal crime... no traffic court, no "pay a fine by mail"...
you have to take a day off work, go to court where you are
seated next to hard core drug dealers and the like, all to
have a federal judge admonish you to drive better and then tell
the federal prosecutor that they didn't really want to see any
more of these bullshit traffic tickets anymore (there were about
30 of us "criminals" on the day I went).

Anyway, these rent-a-cops were worse than useless, and they really
liked to behave like bullies and do random searches and shit.
Made working there really unpleasant.

This policy is a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The companies that "won" the no-bid contracts in the above article
Edited on Thu Aug-12-04 04:17 AM by lebkuchen
don't have any security experience, as mentioned. A bunch of yahoos who don't know what they are doing are given a free reign to roust the people they're meant to protect.

What incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. They probably got a kickback from the auto insurance company whose
Edited on Thu Aug-12-04 09:43 AM by AP
CEO sat on the board of the security company for each traffic ticket issued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. I was told

that the contracting company was going to management every
month with "arrest summaries" and "crime statistics" which
they needed to inflate to justify the number of rent-a-cops
needed to "secure the facility". The marines used to do it with
a force of maybe 20 or 30 (allowing for shifts), these idiots
started with 60 and wanted to increase the size to 100.
Assholes.

Anytime you reward the police force for finding crime, they will
find more crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Which is why there are some things better left to the public sector...
...not the private sector.

Capitalism and the free market is great for a lot of things. It does a better job than the public sector when you need competition and innovation.

But there are a lot of things that the public service provides much better than the private sector. Clearly this is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hessians with NO accountability, no ethical soldier's code
They form the backbone of the murderous torturers at Abu Ghrahib and they carried out the Will of the Emperor there.

Eventually, maybe not at first, they will perform the same general functions in Imperial Amerika.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. Another layer to cover the true price
As appalling as the figures thrown around for this stupid invasion, $87 billion, $166 billion, $200 billion, we just don't have any idea what the real costs and the true price are that we're paying for this incredible debacle.

Private security guards to patrol military bases in the U.S.? Wasteful, corrupt, short-sighted. Any other adjectives? I already have appalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. A good time to write a letter to the editor
Some of you have some experience with these....
write a letter.

letters@latimes.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Other than vandalism or traffic violations,
for what would these private guards be able to provide security?

In the horrid instance of current circumstances, would it work to beef up the local PDs? At least there would be standards and some chain of accountability. Mercenaries throwing around the weight of the federal govt amongst private citizens doesn't seem very, um...free or democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Never good to fight Wars with Mercenaries
They have their OWN agendas :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Wackenhut, one of the LARGEST private prison contractors is cashing in
on a program INTENDED TO AID MINORITIES????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. LINING THE EXECUTIVES POCKETS WITH $$$$$$$$$$$$
WOW said Cheney this is too easy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksatriyakiller Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. wtf
wtf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC