Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pakistanis 'doubt war on terror'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 02:17 PM
Original message
Pakistanis 'doubt war on terror'
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 02:45 PM by dArKeR
Prominent Pakistani politician Imran Khan has said many in his country are deeply sceptical about the government's role in fighting terrorism.

They did not see the current approach as "beneficial" for Pakistan, the former Pakistan cricket captain said.

He told the BBC there was a widespread perception that the recent arrests of al-Qaeda suspects might reflect the president's dependence on US support.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3544818.stm


Previous on Musharraf:

Musharraf's coup

Elections in Pakistan are now threatened

Special report: Pakistan

Leader
Monday June 25, 2001
The Guardian

In perpetrating a second coup against democracy, General Pervez Musharraf may have strengthened his own position but he has done Pakistan no favours. Gen Musharraf's decision to elevate himself from "chief executive", the title he assumed after the 1999 military takeover, to president, had been predicted. But that does not make it any more acceptable. And the timing was inept, coming as his foreign minister, Abdul Sattar, was in Washington trying to persuade a sceptical US administration to show more understanding of his country's problems.

Mr Sattar, who seems to have been badly caught out by the presidential putsch, conducted a similar exercise in London the previous week. Any progress he may have made has now been wrecked by the general's action, which brought sharp rebukes from the US State Department and the Foreign Office. Any chance that Washington would relax its sanctions has been blown, while the Commonwealth must decide whether to expel Pakistan when it meets later this year.

Just as when he overthrew Pakistan's elected prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, Gen Musharraf justifies his latest constitutional violation on grounds of personal duty and the national interest. Some progress has been made since 1999 in tackling corruption and restoring order to the country's indebted economy. Growth this year is estimated at 4% and exports and foreign currency reserves are up. But these advances have come at a high cost, with normal political life suspended, violence in Kashmir increasing again, and Pakistan isolated, especially over its links with Afghanistan's Taliban. Although Gen Musharraf promises to allow parliamentary elections by October next year, he is likely to retain his dominant, still illegitimate position, backed by an unelected security council. Public anger at Mr Sharif's clique has been replaced by a sense of powerlessness.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/pakistan/Story/0,2763,511917,00.html

+++++++++++++++

COUP IN PAKISTAN

JIM LEHRER: That military coup in Pakistan: We start with a report from Robert Moore of Independent Television News filed earlier today.

ROBERT MOORE: No pictures have emerged from Pakistan since news of the military coup first broke, but the latest reports suggest that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is under house arrest. There have been no official announcements from the civilian or from the military leadership tonight, and the television stations have been taken off the air.

SPOKESPERSON: The meeting dispelled the impression...

ROBERT MOORE: In mid-broadcast, a program was interrupted. And tonight, the confusion remains. But the key development was Prime Minister Sharif's attempt to sack this man, General Perveez Musharraf, the head of the army. He was away in Sri Lanka, but appears to have organized the coup, in what appears to have been a highly effective counterattack following his sacking. The crisis was triggered when the military was ordered to pull back Pakistani guerrillas who had crossed into Indian-controlled territory in Kashmir. For many in the army, this was a humiliating setback in the confrontation with India. Developments in Pakistan will be causing alarm throughout South Asia. The army has mobilized not just in the capital, Islamabad, but also in the second city of Karachi, and also in Lahore, Prime Minister Sharif's hometown and power base. Ever since the country followed India and conducted underground nuclear explosions, the stakes have increased enormously. The West now faces a military coup and possible chaos in the world's newest and most volatile nuclear state. In the last few minutes, news has flashed on Pakistani television saying that the Nawaz Sharif government is being dismissed, a sign the coup is now being consolidated.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/asia/july-dec99/pakistan_10-12.html

+++++++++++++

A beleaguered Pakistan military regime faces mounting criticism

By Vilani Peiris
21 November 2000

Use this version to print

Last month marked one year since General Pervez Musharraf ousted the elected Pakistani government, arrested prime minister Nawaz Sharif and installed his own military regime. Accusing the previous government of corruption and ruining the economy, Musharraf promised to bring economic progress and political stability, eradicate poverty, build investor confidence and restore democracy as quickly as possible.

Twelve months later none of these promises have been fulfilled. The economy is still on a knife-edge and there is growing popular discontent with falling living standards and the lack of basic democratic rights. The regime is under fire not only from the political opposition but also from its supporters in the ruling elites including among the military top brass.

At the end of October, a meeting of key military commanders grilled Musharraf over the record of his administration. According to an Agence France-Presse report: “Political and diplomatic sources said that the commanders discussed plans to appoint a civilian prime minister to deflect public anger from the military, should the situation deteriorate further.”

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/nov2000/pak-n21.shtml


++++++++++

The Strange Case of Mr. Hyde and Dr. Jekyll: General Pervez Musharraf

http://www.pakistan-facts.com/staticpages/index.php/20021121101525217
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Meanwhile the rest of Pakistan is wondering what took this guy so long to
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 02:30 PM by acmavm
catch on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ominous words
snip>

He also warned that President Pervez Musharraf administration's was too dependent on US support.

"Our government is no different to the Iraqi Governing Council," he said.

snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allemand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yet it may be true what General Zinni said
"Musharraf may be America's last hope in Pakistan, and if he fails, the fundamentalists would get hold of the Islamic bomb."

http://www.pakistan-facts.com/staticpages/index.php/20021121102530158

The situation in Pakistan is really complicated, and the fact that it is now a nuclear power makes it even more complicated, and a lot more dangerous as well. There simply are no Manichean alternatives and no easy solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I believe that is why it is so urgent to elect John Kerry
The world is entirely too dangerous to allow these childish thugs to remain in charge. We need someone with intelligence and wisdom and tact. Kerry is extremely intelligent and very tactful plus he knows so many very good people he could choose from for his cabinet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. The bushistas rewarded Pakistani nuclear proliferation
Edited on Sat Aug-07-04 10:22 PM by teryang
They protected it while it was ongoing and then did away with the military embargo under the post 911 pretext that Pakistan, one of the backers of the 911 conspiracy, was an ally in the phony "war on terror."

Pakistan is a primary state sponsor of "terrorists" and "terrorists attacks." We taught them everything we knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allemand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-04 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Your last link is from an Indian Military website
The article originally appeared on this site:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE4-6/arya.html

Bharat Rakshak is "The Consortium of Indian Military Websites".
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/

I was kind of wondering why the author seemed so obsessed about "psywar operations" until I saw the link to the "BR Monitor"...

However, the article offers a wealth of details which would be a good starting point for a real sociological analysis of Musharrafs career, but the obvious bias makes it hard to discern between facts and psywar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC