Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sony, BMG to Lay Off 2,000 Staffers -Sources

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:20 PM
Original message
Sony, BMG to Lay Off 2,000 Staffers -Sources
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=musicNews&storyID=5699352

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - About 2,000 staffers worldwide will be let go as a result of the upcoming merger between recording industry giants Sony Music and Bertelsmann Music Group (BMG), sources said.

The combined company is expected to reap cost savings of $300 million-$360 million a year, according to industry insiders.

The European Union's antitrust division is expected to announce approval of the merger as soon as Tuesday. The international restructuring of Sony BMG is expected to be complete by June 2005 and will mostly affect back-office operations, sources said.

Representatives from Sony and BMG declined comment Friday. Sony's artist roster includes Jessica Simpson, Destiny's Child and Audioslave. BMG acts include recent U.S. chart-toppers Usher, Avril Lavigne and Velvet Revolver.

The board of directors of the combined Sony BMG will comprise members of both companies. Andrew Lack, chairman and CEO of Sony Music Entertainment, will helm the merged company as CEO, with BMG chairman and CEO Rolf Schmidt-Holtz serving as the chairman of the board.

...more...

merger mania has a price for employment - look at that economy roar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. The AVERAGE staffer at Sony or BMG

had a fully burdened cost of $165,000/year?

Even assuming 1/3 overhead (health care, FICA contribution, 401K, etc),
that's an average salary of $109,000 give or take.

Man, even allowing for California salaries, $109K as the average
wage for 2000 employees is really good.

So, what will 2000 recording industry executives do now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's hardly how it works. The music biz has been top-heavy
for decades.

A friend of mine is a VP ar Warner Music in NYC. He makes around $120k p/a. His boss makes $250k. His boss makes $1million. His boss makes $17 million.

My friend's assistant makes $30k a year...and he can't get her a raise because WEA "is watching salaries."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And they're whining about kids who won't pay $15 for their crappy CD's
so they bootleg them instead?

It sounds to me like they can afford to pay the guys low down a little more (so their kids can have $ to buy CDs) and they can probably afford to lower the prices of CDs so that it's more convenient to purchase than bootleg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Go to the Indies
If they want to stay in the business. Some may even start their own labels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. They will flip
burgers like the rest of us in the "manufacturing" industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. ah yes... the jobloss recovery thunders on...
NOT! :eyes: :crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-04 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The corporations don't want the responibilty or the headaches
as has to do with managment of Human resources, the would just like the income they can make off it or plain just offing it to make a profit, they have been saying this all along


The Shadow Government


Secret Rule

It is becoming increasingly apparent to American citizens that government is no longer being conducted in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, or, within states, according to state constitutions. While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still cling to the naive belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of the institutions of society, the courts, the press, and law enforcement agencies, still largely comply with the Constitution and the law in important matters. They expect that these corrupting forces are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance one another.

Mounting evidence makes it clear that the situation is far worse than most people think, that during the last several decades the U.S. Constitution has been effectively overthrown, and that it is now observed only as a façade to deceive and placate the masses. What has replaced it is what many call the Shadow Government. It still, for the most part, operates in secret, because its control is not secure. The exposure of this regime and its operations must now become a primary duty of citizens who still believe in the Rule of Law and in the freedoms which this country is supposed to represent.<1>
Transition to Oligarchy

It is difficult to identify a single date or event that marks the overthrow, but we can identify some critical steps.

The first was the Dick Act of 1903, which repealed the Militia Act of 1792 and tried to relegate the Constitutional Militia to the National Guard, under control of what is now the U.S. Defense Department. The second was the Federal Reserve Act, which established a central bank only nominally under the control of the government.

Further erosion of constitutional governance was motivated by several challenges which the powerful felt required them to put aside their differences and unite. The first was the Great Depression of 1933-1941. The second was World War II and the threat from fascism, followed by the Cold War and the threat from Soviet imperialism and from communism.
(snip)
http://freedomlaw.com/ShadGovt.html

written 1994,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC