Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservatives seek to help Ralph Nader

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
wyethwire Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 08:48 AM
Original message
Conservatives seek to help Ralph Nader

SALEM, Ore. -- Two conservative groups have been phoning people around Oregon this week, urging them to attend Ralph Nader's convention Saturday in hopes of putting Nader's name on Oregon's presidential ballot.

The groups make no bones about their goal - to draw votes away from Democrat John Kerry and help President Bush win this battleground state in November.

"We disagree with Ralph Nader's politics, but we'd love to see him make the ballot," said Russ Walker of Citizens for a Sound Economy, a group best known for its opposition to tax increases.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/apelection_story.asp?category=1131&slug=Nader%20Convention

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let us see the Nader defenders
Explain this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Anyone? Anyone?
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 01:25 PM by demo@midlife
Just how long ago did Nader decide to lower the bar on his own (stated) principles, anyway? I think he's operating from a new set of unspoken "principles" these days.

And why would anyone throw their vote away on such a person?

Get this, BTW: I JUST heard is that he's telling people in the so-called swing states to go ahead and attend his rallies, even if they plan to vote for Kerry, and suggesting, "Why not give the democrats a scare before voting for him?"

I supposed that would give him some kind of perverse thrill to find out how many people would actually do what he says. He wants SOMEBODY to do what he says, seeing that so many who got his vote in '00 refuse to drink that Naderade again.

Why would people enjoy manipulating the electorate while being manipulated themselves?

His words and tactics get more sick and self-serving every day.

(edited to add comments)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. *sigh*
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. At Least, Sir
It answers the question of whar Wrecker Nader will use for a campaign organization....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. First of all
Since Nader did not hire these firms, then Nader supporters have no anwsering to do.

Moreover, if Kerry has to worry about Oregon, then he's got more problems than ralphy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The hell they don't. They're responsible for making the situation possible
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 10:34 AM by Mountainman
If you support Nader and his campaign is an invitation to Repubs to use that to hurt Kerry, you, by inference, support what the Repubs are doing and you are as responsible as anyone. If you don't want the blame, then urge Nader to drop out. If not, then take the heat!

Stop playing like the innocent victim and the holier than thou leftists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. So third parties are forever banned?
Please as long as I listen to you, every year will be too important to "risk" on a third party.

Stop playing the you're either with us or against us crap, nothing is that clear cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. The question is are you results orientated or process orientated.
The result could be a Bush win. This year that is what is most important to stop. If you are a process orientated person and you don't give a damn about the results you are responsible for the results just the same. You can't hide under the covers and claim innocence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. So, as a true leftist,
These are my options:

Vote the "safe way" only to watch Kerry recind his policies lean ever more right to "gain voters" (what a joke, most people in this country would vote for a truely left democrat).

-or-

Vote the issues and my concious and A) have four more years of Bush and B) have folks like you call me egomanical for sticking to my guns.

I can take the verbal abuse and I sure as hell can beat bush through grassroots (with the help of my friends), so I'll keep my consious clean.

P.S. Before the flames rise up out of your keyboard keep in mind I live in Indiana. 75/25 Bush tilt in 2000. I've stated many times that I might feel differently if I lived somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Shouldn't Ralph be able to get enough signatures on his own to
get on the ballot or does he need help from Republicans? Looks like he needs help from Republicans. Nader, a so-called "progressive", needs help from the very people he supposedly wants out of office. Oh the irony!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Wrecker Nader, Sir
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 10:50 AM by The Magistrate
Does not want the Republican reactionaries out of office. He wants them to destroy the Bemocratic Party for him, in the hope that he will emerge to rule the wreckage of it as Captain of the Left. In this frankly stated desire, he becomes the willing tool of the worst elements of reaction in our polity in their designs against the people.

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. How about this firm?
<snip>
Nader's bid for the Arizona ballot began this spring when members of his campaign sought a contract with Arno Political Consultants, a California-based Republican consulting firm that has handled past ballot-qualification efforts for GOP icons like Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, as well as anti-immigrant groups like U.S. English.

Arno's client list also comprises a virtual Who's Who of the corporate cartels Nader routinely rails against, including Occidental Petroleum, Phillip Morris, and Wal-Mart. Arno Political Consultants rebuffed the Nader campaign's request. "I thought it would be bad for us to go in with anyone like Nader," said the company's co-director, Michael Arno. "And even though I don't know Bush personally, I have a relationship with some of the people close to him, so I didn't want to be part of anything that could be seen as nefarious. I have too much respect for the process." Despite the rejection, Arno says, he has been repeatedly approached by members of Nader's campaign this month to handle their ballot qualification effort in New Mexico. He has refused these appeals as well.
<snip>

So much for that progressive, anti-corporate movement.

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=7954

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. So ralphy is bad because he doesn't have
Inhouse polling and signature firms. Whatever, if you have to choose a polling firm why not choose one that has good track record in Arizona.
I am not defending ralph, but A) I doubt that's a whole truth and B)Who the pollster knows or has worked for before makes him a business man, neither inherently good or bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Don't you think it's a little funny
that a mercenary, commercial firm rejected Nader because they have principles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Neo nazis have principles... is that funny
If consorting with Cheney's pals and doing their bidding means having the kind of principles you hope to extoll then you've found the wrong website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Well, Ralphie desperately wanted to do businesss
with these Neo-Nazis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. no a sub section of ralph's campaign management did the calling
and desperate might be a strong word. Like I said before, I doubt this is a whole truth. Just like when people say known republican Ben Stein gives money to ralph nader - that's not a whole truth. Ben and ralph are personal friends, moreover ben is a TRUE conservative who cares about the environment and american job loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orlin2k Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Oregon is a swing state
it is not a safe state. It barely went to Gore last election.
Yes, there are very liberal cities like Eugene and most of
Portland but there are a lot of towns that are conservative.
And a lot of those liberal especially in Eugen may go to Nader
if he is on the ballot. So Ralphy is a problem in Oregon and
every other swing state. Nader is a spoiler and we can't
afford him this election cycle. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. gore didn't win his or clinton's home state
so if states with strong liberal percentages or political ties aren't won by a candidate who should handily win there it probably says somthing more about the candidate than those who are running against him.

I've repeated this a million times: If we were to wait for the democrats to tell us when it was 'safe' to build a third party we would wait for eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Bush did not win his home state either
Connecticut. What the f*** does that have to do with ANYTHING???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyethwire Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. The Nader Philosophy of Lifesaving

Mr. Nader, it says here that you tied a rock around a man's legs while swimming and he drowned.

NADER: Look it's not my fault, if he had been a stronger swimmer he never would have drowned, rock or no rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Where as kerry....
Would say, "Look I know bush's policies will eventually make you believe your only option is jumping off a cliff, so I am going to make sure you know at least six months in advance so you can find an acceptable cliff."

When speeding off a cliff, kerry would let off the gas, true leftists (notice: not using nader's name) will be hitting the breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack The Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Aren't there pictures...
somewhere of a leading conservative of some state and the Nader representative of that state meeting somewhere?

I'm sorry this is so vague, but I think I saw a post on Buzzflash about this a few days ago.

Naders whole campaign stinks to high hell this time around, particularly when he has been a guest at Grover Norquist's weekly Hate speech talking points breakfasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. In Arizona, Mr. Tab
They were up yesterday in the Campaign Forum, if recollection serves....

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Got a link on Ralph at the Grover Norquist breakfasts? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. Saint Ralph says that we shouldn't vote Dems
because they are not 100% pure.

It's wrong for Dems to ever do anything for policial purposes, but it's Ok for Ralph to accept help from Repubs?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ralph Nader is nothing more than a right wing enabler
He is not a part of the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder if these callers are telling people who they REALLY are
That's probably a really stupid question, because they're probably POSING as his supporters. If they said they were actually rethugs, SURELY people would be thinking twice about voting Nader. Surely if these two groups stand for "family values" then they would't be lying, will they??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyethwire Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Daily Kos has a phone script

Click here for a scan of the phone script

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/6/25/101933/449

Clearly identifying themselves as "Citizens for a Sound Economy" (a GOP group founded by Reagan's Budget Director)

They clearly state there intention is to hurt John Kerry by getting Nader on the ballot.

They are calling Republicans, not Greens, and asking them to help get Nader on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thanks for setting me straight.
Gotta admire the purity and principles of those Christian family types who enjoy hurting veterans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. Look at that
The Repukes are being more honest that Nadir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hightime Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn seek to help Ralph Nader.
Interesting bedmates. FOOLS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I don't know Zinn's position.

I think it's fairly clear Chomsky doesn't want to help Nader over Kerry but hopes that Nader can apply left-pressure on the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. You know it was the repiglicans that contributed heavy to Nader
back in 1999 and 2000 to persuade him to run for president. They succeeded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlFrankenFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Just like on This Just In
That conservative cartoon on Spike TV that I think got cancelled. Brian Newport made a "Republicans for Ralph" website, and Nader came to the bar to thank him for his support.

"Yep, I support you all the way through November 1st, 2004!"
"The election is November 2nd."
"Exactly!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. Nader should do the moral thing & support Democrats.
He needs to get out of bed with Bush pronto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetladybug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I didn't vote for Nader in 2000. I voted for Gore and I will vote for
Kerry this year, but Nader has the right to run for President and I do not think it was his fault that Gore was unable to take the oath of office for President in 2000. THE REPUBLICANS STOLE THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECT! Nader is a smart man and he knows what the Republicans did in 2000 and I think if it comes down to it that he will throw his support behind Kerry before he sees Bush in the whitehouse for another 4 yrs. I also think his ads will be against Bush and his policies not attacks on Kerry. In a way it makes sense to me for both the Democrats and Greens have attack ads against Bush. It will be 2 against 1 exposing Bush for the asshole that he is. I could be wrong but I think Nader will throw his support behind Kerry this time if need be. (Just my opinion)
ELECT KERRY 2004!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. "Conservatives Seek to Help Nader"
Nader has the power to end his alliance with them. You call it what you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niu rou hao chi Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. don't limit choice
Perhaps this is just the next ring of the American political process. A new campaign strategy to beat the other party. What really matters is that you practice good citizenship and vote. Vote for whomever you think will do the best job. Vote for whomever you think will win. Vote for whomever your teacher/parents/friends/party/union told you to vote for. That is one of the great things about this country. We actually get to vote for our leaders. Having lived in a communist country I know what it is like to not have that right.

My point is that as soon as we start acting to limit our choices we are limiting our voice in society. Instead of looking at Nader as the devil himself we should look at what his role is in this process. His role is to either:

A) bring issues that the two parties are not discussing into the popular dialog

or

B) evilly crush any hopes of a Democratic win.

If the latter is the case I would think this would be quite easily proven and those who would vote for him would be easily persuaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Bullshit -- this has nothing to do with choice
It has everything to do with whether Nader is simply allowing himself to become a tool of right-wing Republicans.

If Nader had any sense of honor, he would insist that his name be kept OFF the ballot if it turns out that the only reason he became eligible for a spot on the ballot in the first place was because of a Republican-orchestrated signature campaign.

If Nader is able to convince enough like-minded wrong-headed leftists to support his candidacy to earn a spot on the ballot, fine. But if he has to depend on the signatures of right-wing Republicans who have ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION of supporting him in the general election, then he may as well cut the crap and admit that he's running to hurt Kerry's chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Indeed, Mr. Dolstein
Having the right to do something does not make it the right thing to do.

Wrecker Nader's current activity is a textbook illustration....

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonkultur Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
41. Why not just...
Prop up the Constitution party (Christian Right) or Libertarians (Small Govt) to draw votes away from Bush?

Fight fire with fire.

Nader is not the only 3rd party candidate. There are alot of right wing/conservative people who will not vote for Kerry but do not want to vote for Bush either. They will vote for Bush unless they know of an alternative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC