Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon seeks OK to spy on Americans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CShine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:41 PM
Original message
Pentagon seeks OK to spy on Americans
Newsweek reports that the US Department of Defense is looking for the right to gather information from, and about, Americans, without having to tell them that they are doing so. "Without a public hearing or debate," the news magazine reports, "Defense officials recently slipped a provision into a bill before Congress that could vastly expand the Pentagon's ability to gather intelligence inside the United States, including recruiting citizens as informants."

Currently all military intelligence organizations must comply with the Privacy Act. The act is a Watergate-era law that requires that any government official who is seeking information from a resident of the US disclose who they are and why they are seeking the information. But Newsweek reports that last month the Senate Intelligence Committee, in closed session, added the provision that would exempt the Pentagon from this restriction.

Among those pushing for the bill was "NORTHCOM," the new North American command set up by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in Colorado. NORTHCOM's mission is to over see "homeland defense."

A report by the Senate Intelligence Committee says the provision would allow military intel agents to "approach potential sources and collect personal information from them" without disclosing they work for the government. The justification: "Current counterterrorism operations," the report explains, which require "greater latitude ... both overseas and within the United States." ... Pentagon lawyers insist agents will still be legally barred from domestic "law enforcement." But watchdog groups see a potentially alarming "mission creep." "This... is giving them the authority to spy on Americans," said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies, a group frequently critical of the war on terror. "And it's all been done with no public discussion, in the dark of night."

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0617/dailyUpdate.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Papers, Please."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now wouldn't that be lovely....eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is un-Constitutional
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. But, everything is different now...
Don't you know that the founding fathers didn't mean the Constitution to apply in the event of terrorism? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. 9-11 changed everything. That's what I'm told, anyway.
That's a pretty damned good excuse though. I now use it when I'm late for work, caught speeding, or late with my bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha Ha Ha ha ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
You be a very funny person. ROTFLMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I realize that I have become in Orwell's world
a comedic act.

I am a clown with a sad face.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. There you have it .>>> Osama won the war on terrorism
America will be forever fucked up thanks to Osama and Bush.

...when will I awake from this horrible nightmare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is so dangerous particularly given the culpability of,...
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 12:47 PM by Just Me
,...those administering the Pentagon. People should definitely be a bit more than just concerned over this expansion of power to spy on Americans. It is subject to abuses that endanger every American citizen.

Pretty scary shit, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. they WILL spy on democrats
it's already in the Rove/Bush book of blackmail/revenge

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. ...
Nothing from these neo-Nazis surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fdr_hst_fan Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Neo-Nazis is right;
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 01:02 PM by fdr_hst_fan
I've been saying that for months on other sites, and they laugh at me and call me paranoid, but it's NOT paranoia-it's history repeating itself. Leave us not forget that Dubya's grandfather, Prescott Bush, was a Nazi sympathizer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happynewyear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. you are correct of course
Proof right here too:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Damn the German guy Maximillian Freiherr von Weichs is a dead ringer
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 05:31 PM by 0007
for that Okahoma guy, Senator Inhofe

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. A licence to spy illegally
"Pentagon lawyers insist agents will still be legally barred from domestic 'law enforcement.'"

Of course they will. The Pentagon is not looking to enforce the law; it's looking for ways to break it, without anyone noticing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fdr_hst_fan Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Weren't there Congressional
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 01:06 PM by fdr_hst_fan
hearing held about this sort of thing in the wake of Watergate? You know, abouot internal espionage by the CIA? I know this isn't the CIA this time, but still...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sure, we all bitch and complain. Meanwhile.......

...the govt is in the hands of the evil doers and nothing will be done to reverse this bill.

Unless we win congress back this time around, even a Kerry presidency won't be able to reverse this. Only a vote to reverse by the congress will be able to stop the nazis, and the chances of taking over congress are slim and none.

And if you're waiting for the courts to declare it unconstitutional, well, don't hold your breath. That was the reason the nazis wanted all those repug judges appointed.

I'm waiting to see what a Kerry presidency holds. I'm afraid even liberal Kerry will not be able to do much to change the direction that our gov't has taken in the last three and a half years.

Maybe Costa Rica?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jukes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. i'm thinking
curacao or belize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. They are going to get it, too
The Empire has not yet begun to squeeze our throats intheir iron fists.

Nazi fucks! Free America WILL OPPOSE YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. The Bushistas want Secret Police!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. Old Story - Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. Violation of Posse Comitatus
"POSSE COMITATUS ACT" (18 USC 1385): A Reconstruction Era criminal law proscribing use of Army (later, Air Force) to "execute the laws" except where expressly authorized by Constitution or Congress. Limit on use of military for civilian law enforcement also applies to Navy by regulation. Dec '81 additional laws were enacted (codified 10 USC 371-78) clarifying permissible military assistance to civilian law enforcement agencies--including the Coast Guard--especially in combating drug smuggling into the United States. Posse Comitatus clarifications emphasize supportive and technical assistance (e.g., use of facilities, vessels, aircraft, intelligence, tech aid, surveillance, etc.) while generally prohibiting direct participation of DoD personnel in law enforcement (e.g., search, seizure, and arrests). For example, Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments (LEDETS) serve aboard Navy vessels and perform the actual boardings of interdicted suspect drug smuggling vessels and, if needed, arrest their crews). Positive results have been realized especially from Navy ship/aircraft involvement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. later law supersedes earlier?

Ya know, the Reaganista neocons hated Posse Commitatus and wanted to get rid of it in the 80s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think military intel or the OSI or CID already does this.
I cant really give any details here, but I am pretty sure that they arleady have been doing this.

I think they are just keeping tabs on whats going on "outside the gate" around military bases, keeping tabs on potential troublemakers.

Whether this is legal or not I dont know. But i think its been going on, at least since the early 1980s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. Does anyone think they're not already doing it?
Whether it's "okayed," or not, probably makes little difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC