Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Leading Index Increases Again (13th out of 14 months up-so 7/03 boom?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:04 PM
Original message
U.S. Leading Index Increases Again (13th out of 14 months up-so 7/03 boom?
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 12:08 PM by papau
U.S. Leading Index Increases Again

http://www.conference-board.org/economics/press.cfm?press_id=2415

The Conference Board announced today that the U.S. leading index increased 0.5 percent, the coincident index increased 0.3 percent and the lagging index increased 0.1 percent in May.

The leading index increased again in May, and the increases in recent months have continued to be widespread. May's 0.5 percent increase keeps the current growth rate of the leading index in the 3.5 to 4.5 percent range (annual rate), about the same as the approximately 4.5 percent growth rate since the low in March 2003.
<snip>

The pickup in the growth rate of the leading index last year signaled stronger economic growth, and correspondingly, real GDP has increased at a 5.0 to 5.5 percent annual rate since the middle of last year. The current 3.5 to 4.5 percent growth rate of the leading index is signaling the continuation of this relatively strong rate of economic growth in the near term.

Leading Indicators. Eight of the ten indicators that make up the leading index increased in May. The positive contributors - beginning with the largest positive contributor – were average weekly manufacturing hours, real money supply*, interest rate spread, vendor performance, building permits, manufacturers’ new orders for consumer goods and materials*, average weekly initial claims for unemployment insurance (inverted), and manufacturers’ new orders for nondefense capital goods*. The negative contributors - beginning with the largest negative contributor – were index of consumer expectations and stock prices.<snip>

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=716&e=6&u=/ap/20040617/ap_on_bi_ge/leading_indicators

Leading Indicators Up More Than Expected

EILEEN ALT POWELL, AP Business Writer

NEW YORK - A closely watched gauge of future economic activity rose a stronger-than-expected 0.5 percent in May, suggesting that the U.S. economy will continue sturdy expansion through the summer.

<snip>Analysts had been expecting an increase of 0.4 percent in May.

The index is closely watched because it is designed to predict the economy's path in the next three to six months. <snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. urg
I remember when bush predicted 2 million jobs this year...everyone thought it was BS, me included, but according to the stats, they have already created a million in the past 6 months...I know bush had nada to do with it...just part of the typical post recession bounce...but still, this will make it difficult for kerry to sell a different economic plan..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Many of those jobs don't even exist
IIRC, they changed how they calculate job creation to make it more of an estimate based on other indicators than an actual count. It's been discussed in a number of threads in LBN, GD and the Economics forum here. Many of those 1,000,000 jobs were 'estimated', ie., imaginary.

In any case, I'm sure that I'll be able to take these good economic numbers to my landlord and get him to forgive a month's worth of rent since the economy is so obviously recovering, right? No? Oh. Then it's not good for much, is it?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Those Job Numbers Are As Reliable As The Terrorism Numbers
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulethree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. same group has a help-wanted index which is down ?? EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Many of the others are people who had to take parttime jobs
with no benefits, which is the kind of work corporations are choosing these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. while i'm sure the economy is doing better
what i find more interesting are the other numbers -- the ones they don't tell you.
the fact that they don't actually count the number of people employed, the real numbers of new jobs created and the kinds of jobs, the number of people who aren't looking, the number of people in prison, etc.
the economy is not healthy for all kinds of reasons -- but there will still be forward momentum -- it's just not the whole story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
74dodgedart Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 02:48 PM
Original message
Run huge deficits, War time production, massive tax cuts, lowest interest
rates in years. Things were bound to pick up sooner or later.

The problem is: whose going to pay for all of this ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
74dodgedart Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Run huge deficits, War time production, massive tax cuts, lowest interest
rates in years. Things were bound to pick up sooner or later.

The problem is: whose going to pay for all of this ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
74dodgedart Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Run huge deficits, War time production, massive tax cuts, lowest interest
rates in years. Things were bound to pick up sooner or later.

The problem is: whose going to pay for all of this ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hey, I think your tranny is slipping!
Shift into neutral, punch it and slam it back into drive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
74dodgedart Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. What makes you say that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
74dodgedart Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. What makes you say that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
74dodgedart Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. What makes you say that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Look around you....does ANYTHING about the economy look better to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC