Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats debate whether to repeal all or just some of Bush's tax cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 07:48 PM
Original message
Democrats debate whether to repeal all or just some of Bush's tax cuts
PHILADELPHIA (AP)


The Democratic presidential hopefuls sparred over how to deal with President Bush's tax cuts Monday night, one of the stickiest issues facing the candidates in next year's election.

All nine candidates want to eliminate at least some of Bush's cuts. But two philosophies have emerged: One camp says all the cuts should be repealed to pay for health care and other programs; the other side says such a broad tax increase would be bad for Democrats. --

Kerry, Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich and former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun said they would target any tax increases to the wealthy. They say they would keep tax cuts that are helping the middle class, such as the child tax credit and relief for married couples.

Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and activist Al Sharpton said the first step to repairing the economy would be to repeal Bush's tax cuts. --

Seven of the nine Democratic presidential candidates came to Philadelphia to appear at the town hall meeting sponsored by Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell and the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, a union representing 150,000 workers in the United States and Canada. --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's to debat?
Repeal them all. We need the money to repair the damage we did to outselves and the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed. All.
Wasn't that easy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AfricanDonkey Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. and increase taxes on the middle class?
no thanks. I have diapers and baby formula to buy thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The Middle Class Tax Burden Has Increased Thanks To The Tax Giveaway
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A10323-2003Jun3¬Found=true

And no, it doesn't mean you are going to pay less taxes - at least in the near future. The costs of the war, plus the costs of a growing and aging population will demand more government spending. Or, if you like, we can eliminate Social Security or Medicare and deal with the shitstorm that will come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AfricanDonkey Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. yea but seriously, PLEASE do not take way the child tax credit
Its something I can count on, regardless of who wins the congress or presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
17.  I'm with you, AfricanDonkey.
If we attempt to repeal the child tax credit we will go down in flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. You must have the the tax cuts mixed up ...
Edited on Tue Aug-12-03 09:24 AM by Drifter
the tax cuts that are being discussed here, are the ones that were given to people (and corporations) that need them the least. AWOL's tax cuts did nothing but clear out the treasury to his political donors, while placing the burden on the middle class.

Repealing the Tax cuts would put the burdon back on the people (corporations) that can more afford it, while relieving the middle-class, and those below them on the scale.

Cheers
Drifter

Edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. all..NO compromises
the fact that it will piss off the pukes is reason enough to do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. keep the ones meant for the bottom 25%
like the child tax credit. These were the cuts meant to placate the masses as the * plutocracy gave ITSELF its big fat kickback.

Keep those, and let's get the tax rates increased on THOSE THAT CAN AFFORD THEM AND HAVE BENEFITED THE MOST FROM WHAT THEIR COUNTRY HAS PROVIDED THEM.

I am tired of our country being by the rich and for the rich. It will be the end of us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've decided to stop thinking.
Whatever Dr. Dean says is automatically my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnAmerican Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Um....OK
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Now, that's FUNNY!
LOL. I like Dean too, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Both arguments make sense to me.
Both arguments make sense to me. I wouldn't choose one of the candidates based solely on this issue.

Politically, however, I would choose the Kerry, Lieberman, Kucinich, Moseley-Braun side of the argument. Do we want Bush arguing for lower taxes on working people, while our nominee argues to raise them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lkinsale Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-03 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Graham proposes payroll tax holiday for fair tax relief
Reverse the Bush Fiscal Priorities

Tax Fairness:

* Repeal the Bush dividends and capital gains tax cuts.

* Stop the phase-out of the estate tax at its 2009 level with an exemption of $3.5 million ($7 million for couples), and extend it permanently.

* Reset the top rate at 38.6 percent - lower than the rate when President Clinton left office -- and create a "Millionaire's Bracket" at 40%

* Step up enforcement efforts to close the gap between taxes legally due and those actually being collected, which the Internal Revenue Service estimates at $30 billion a year.

* Repeal the tax advantages -- and impose new penalties -- for individuals and corporations who transfer assets offshore or renounce US citizenship to escape taxation.

Economic Stimulus For All:

* If the economy is still in recession in 2005, put more money into the hands of working Americans who are likely to spend it by taking the first $10,000 of earned income of every American out of taxation under the payroll tax.

* Permanently extend AMT relief for individuals and families

* Extend marriage penalty repeal.

* Extend and maintain the child credit at its highest level of $1000 per child.

* An income tax deduction for up to the full cost of purchasing of long-term care insurance and a caregiver tax credit that phases in after four years to $3000 for taxpayers with long-term care needs.

* Opportunity for All education & training credit will provide nearly $40 billion a year in tax relief to middle class families for advanced education and job training.

http://www.grahamforpresident.com/economic_plan/exec_summ4.html

********

Blog Graham! Join the original (b)logger at his new campaign blog.

Contribute to Graham For President (Enter "Laura Kinsale" as your BobCat if you want to give me credit toward my pledge to raise 1k for Bob.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Code_Name_D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. This is why you do not try to "soften up" bad law.
A classic DLC dem strategy to is to sprinkle a little sugar on the GOP's shit, then calm part of the "by-partisan" credit. These republican lights were dancing in the streets when that bill passed, and were oh so quick to tout how they stood up to the GOP by a) not letting them get every thing they want, and b) slipping in a few of their own pet projects that they want to sing about come campaign time.

The child tax credit was one of the DLC's efforts to get a feather in their cap.

But here we see it backfire. AGAIN! Every thing they did to make these tax cuts more palatable, now works against the Democrats. It doesn’t mater what they do now, any attempt to attack the tax cuts now will be labeled as politics. And the only thing worse than the echo chamber spreading lies, is when the echo chamber happens to repeat the truth. This IS about politics as the DLC again tries to flip flop its position.

The imperative is clear. The whole thing must be repealed. This tax law will have the same effect as dropping the moon on north America. Failure to repeal this means dooming America to certain economic and inescapable collapse. There is no debate on this because there is no choice. But the dummy DLC still think that can dive in the shit and pop out with roses in their cheeks.

So now the DLC only wants to repeal parts of it. Oh please. These guys are just gluttons for punishment. How the fucking hell are they going to do that? Oh they may try, but you watch as they hand the GOP even MORE concessions in order to win yet another peric victory. But the stupid heads of the DLC refuse to listen.

That is why I say that even before we can even challenged the GOP, we must crush their first line of defense, the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. Trash them all and reconsider later
Edited on Tue Aug-12-03 02:04 AM by Buzzz
after all the wars and Homeland Security and education and everything else are paid for and there is a surplus again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yentatelaventa Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. Keep the middle class and lower tax cuts
Raise the millionaire rates a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. reverse everything this junta has done. everything! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC