Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Numbers Challenge (Military recruitment is down)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:35 AM
Original message
Numbers Challenge (Military recruitment is down)
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/US/military_recruitment_040602.html

U.S. Military Struggles to Maintain Adequate Troop Levels

June 2, 2004— The U.S. Army issued orders today that will keep thousands of soldiers in the military longer than they may have planned, in an effort to ensure there are enough combat-ready, fresh forces to continue serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Pentagon is facing another challenge to manpower: Recruitment is down.

The most alarming recruiting decline is in the Air National Guard. Gen. Peter Pace, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Senate panel today that recruiting is off by 23 percent.

"I'm not satisfied with what these numbers portend," Pace said. "We need to be very attentive to the way we are using especially our Guard and Reserve."

Recruitment overall in the National Guard and the reserves is down several percentage points.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, what can the explanation be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Claire Beth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. yeah, really!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. THEY WILL DIE LIKE DOGS


FOR NO GOOD REASON EXCEPT TO IMPROVE THE PROFITS OF CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES LIKE HALLIBURTON
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. gee
but I thought the military was seeing record enlistment numbers. At least, that's what they told me on the tv. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Insider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. twisting figures
need to do some research, but if i remember correctly they were saying things like "105% of target recruiting numbers". and of course they can set targets anywhere. and when i read those articles a couple of months ago, they did not quote numbers, just "percent of targets".

will do some checking today tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I remember something similar
All those folks joining up, sounded like there was a rush to arms. Hmmmm...now, you don't suppose..could it have been ANOTHER misrepresentation, misunderstanding, misdirection (read:LIE)???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. What I remember
was that before 9/11, recruiting fulfilled their quotas (which are set according to the needs of the military to maintain a legislatively set size, and not by political demands) while turning away a significant number of qualified candidates.

After 9/11, and up until now, I remember reading reports that while the #'s hadn't risen as a result of a surge of patriotism, they hadn't gone down either. IOW, they were still turning qualified applicants away.

This is the first report I've read of the numbers actually dropping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. They can also move the targets around.
It just gets easier with stop-loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. If 25 Percent Of The US Population
Has been diagnosed with psychological disorders then it stands to reason that the other 75% doesn't want anybody shooting at their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. The old, familiar
Catch-22. If you're not afraid of dying, you're crazy and valuable to the military, even though insanity is the only out; if you're afraid of dying, you're sane and can't get out of serving, because not wanting to die is a sane response to war. These kids are getting Heller via osmosis, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodictators Donating Member (977 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Army calls it "Stop-Loss" Orders
Sounds like they view their soldiers as commodities.

Actually, this is bad news for Bush. The Powers That Be expect the WH resident to rally the American People to their causes. like PNAC.

It seems that Bush does NOT inspire confidence in potential enlistees. And the "Stop-Loss" orders will surely scare away more enlistees. "You're in the Army, Now and Forever" isn't a good way to attract enlistees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's why Hackworth told Franken there WILL be a draft starting this Dec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. It is heartening to see and hear young people
...particularly the best and brightest, expressing their suspicion that the government is plotting to draft them for Iraq, their opposition to that conflict, and their resentment of the military recruitment presence in their high schools and mailboxes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Little Known facts about Stop-Loss
Well, first a well known fact: Calling it Stop Loss was a stupid idea.

When you enlist in the military on your first enlistment, you don't enlist for 4 years. You enlist for 8 years. The usual (peacetime) pattern is 4 years active duty, and 4 years inactive reserve (non-drilling reservist). During your inactive time, you are subject to recall 'for national emergencies'. What they are doing is forcing these kids to stay past the 4 year active, ie activating their inactive reserve time, so they can send them/keep them in Iraq.

Funny thing is that the Navy is offering early outs to young sailors... rather than keep them the full 4 years, they're giving them honorable discharges at 3.5 years to save money. And old pharts like me, the navy is kicking out at 20, rather than honoring our contracts (mine was to 2006), retiring us rather than paying us for the remaining years.

Navy doesn't want them, Army can't get them to re-up... and they're playing number games to hide the facts ("recruitment is at 105% of quota... but the quota is down 25% from last year!").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. AGAIN, stop loss affects more than first-term enlistees.
It affects 20-year men, too. They aren't "activating" shit. Sure, the extra time you serve counts toward whatever service-remaining obligation you might have otherwise served in the IRR, but if you have more than eight years in, you're still stuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. So you're telling me...
a man with, say, 12 years of service, reaches the end of his enlistment, says 'screw this, I ain't re upping for this', and THEY DON'T RELEASE HIM? His flippin' contract is up, what are they going to do, arrest him for not signing on?

Sorry, doesn't compute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't think the Chimp will be able to wait until next year for a draft
This is getting serious.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yoo Hoo, all Freepers with kids. Taking them down to join up?
Put your money where Halliburton's mouth is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sounds like the Army of One
will be one soon - chimpy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. Doing my best Al Franken impersonation...
LIARS! They've been saying for the past year that the military is meeting all of the recruitment quotas. Some rightwing news sources have suggested that there's actually been an increase in enlistment.

LIARS!! Despite the much ballyhooed decline in educational achievement among American youth, they're still smart enough to know a raw deal when the see one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC