Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tent camp for homeless to be at suburban church | Seattle P-I

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 07:20 PM
Original message
Tent camp for homeless to be at suburban church | Seattle P-I
Tent camp for homeless to be at suburban church

By KRISTEN GELINEAU
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

SEATTLE -- After fierce opposition from local residents, King County officials on Friday moved the site of a proposed tent camp for the homeless to a Bothell church.

The camp was supposed to open Monday for 90 days at the Brickyard Road Park-and-Ride lot, on county land in Bothell, northeast of Seattle. Instead, it will open at St. Brendan's Catholic Church, several miles from the parking lot, County Executive Ron Sims said.

Sims insisted he wasn't bowing to public pressure, only that he didn't want the case to jeopardize the homeless.

More at the Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tent camp? what, they ran out of big cardboard boxes?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would much rather live in a tent than a cardboard box, thank you
I think this effort is admirable and I commend the efforts to find solutions to a national problem. Would that all cities spent 24 million on the homeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's not the city of Seattle spending 24 million on the homeless...

...It's King County. The difference is Ron Sims, the county Executive. He's one of those rare democratic leaders who's not trying to pretend he's a moderate republican. He believes government should help the less fortunate. He believes government should spend money on education, and transportation. He believes government should protect the environment, and guarantee everybody's civil liberties. And he believes government should raise that money by taxing those that have it.

He will, hopefully, be our next Governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No way
Sims arrogance (and stupidity) in this matter was astounding. What kind of an idiot decides to place a homeless shanty town right in the middle of a nice suburban neighborhood filled with young families without even consulting them or holding a single hearing? This fiasco only made Sims look like the stereotypical Seattle liberal. If he (heaven forbid) gets the gubernatorial nomination, get ready for a Republican governor come next January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Catholic church, huh? Where are the self-righteous Fundies??
No tent cities in their suburban, white-bread churches??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. There are much better solution to ending homelessness
than things like tent cities.

This is in your face stuff, that some homeless advocates have decided is a good way to get attention for their cause. However, all it really does is pit people against each other.

Kind hearted as it may seem, tent cities and other forms of 'temporary sheltering' do little to really help anyone. A lot of money is spent on these programs that for the most part keep people homeless.

For a lot less money, most people can be 'rehoused' even if that mean paying for all of their expenses. Rehousing is still cheaper and certainly better than setting up 'tent cities' and so-called Safe Space shelters. Of course, if we rehoused people instead of letting them live in shelters, year after year, we wouldn't need so many shelters?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC