Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Iraqi Govt Can't Expel U.S. Troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:35 PM
Original message
New Iraqi Govt Can't Expel U.S. Troops
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040513/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_iraq_transition&cid=542&ncid=1480

WASHINGTON - The new Iraqi government won't have the authority to evict American forces from Iraq (news - web sites), a top State Department official said Thursday — quickly reversing a statement made minutes earlier before a House panel.


The conflicting exchanges with Undersecretary of State Marc Grossman at a House hearing reflected the difficult balance the U.S. government is trying to strike as it moves closer to the June 30 handover of power to an as-yet unnamed interim Iraqi government.


The United States needs to convince Iraqis that they will have full sovereignty and are no longer under occupation. But they also need to convince them that U.S. forces aren't leaving anytime soon. They say if Iraqis believe the Americans will abandon them, they would be less likely to cooperate with U.S. forces or a U.S.-backed Iraqi government.


When first asked by House International Relations Committee members whether an interim Iraqi government could force U.S. troops to leave, Grossman stressed that Iraqi leaders wanted them to remain. He also said that the Iraqi interim constitution and a U.N. resolution gave them authority to do so.


more...Ah, Democracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. whoOooOOOps!
what a shock! we've only known this for 20+ months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Status of Forces Agreement, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh Come ON KARENINA!
That is SO "Old Century America."
We are now PAX Americana in the NEW American Century!
Get with it babe, PNAC fascist arm bands for all!
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. USA! USA!! USA!!!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Your son was wise to leave, Karenina. He knows the deal.
Wish I could leave myself!

By the way, tell him that his friends hope he's doing well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulethree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. anyone seen one? would love to read it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Another "shock and awe" by PNAC central.
They never intended to leave,...at least not until their 40 year WW(IV) ended.

Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Enjoy your freedom, Iraqistanians!
Edited on Thu May-13-04 02:12 PM by Minstrel Boy
It's like new, straight from the Warsaw Pact. Only slightly used by Czechs during the Velvet Revolution. Try it on for size!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. If they don't have the authority to expel U.S. forces
Then they don't have any real authority at all. The occupation will continue under a (slightly) different name, that is all. Of course that will be no surprise to most people, at least around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Funny definition of "sovereignty" we seem to be using, huh?
These lying fucks don't seem to give a shit what they say. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Introducing Iraqi Freedom Lite!
Looks Great!

Less Filling!

All the great PR value and pizzazz of Freedom without all that pesky, caloric Representative Democracy!!

Rummy sez - "You'll LOVE it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Looks like a pump — feels like a sneaker. ...n/t
TYY :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lakhdar Brahimi disagrees
Edited on Thu May-13-04 01:49 PM by htuttle
From yesterday:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=550859&mesg_id=550859

Speaking to Powell's 'Limited Sovereignty' ideas:


Brahimi said the UN had criticized use of this expression and insisted authorities at any country should always be in the hands of the people with no exception. The envoy added the new Iraqi government shall also decide the fate of 150,000 foreign military officers currently in Iraq.


So, didn't the pResident say Brahimi was going to work out the transition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He didn't say Brahimi would have the final say.
Just that he'd work out the details. Not that they would be accepted.

Jack Straw said something similar, that Iraq would have veto power. (Brit deputy PM, foreign secretary.) He's being similarly disowned on this point I do believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. So what?
Just because they can't expel our troops, install a theocracy, publish a newspaper critical of the US, or be anti-Israel doesn't mean they don't have full sovereignty. Oh, I almost forgot, they probably can't have WMD either. Hmm. They probably can't order advanced military equipment either.

However, if they have a problem with their neighbor's dog, they can solve it totally free of US interference!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Their "army" will have water pistols I hear.
Also, they will have a "Model UN" in which aspiring young politicians can participate in. Their generals will have many shiny medals too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. So let me get this straight...
Edited on Thu May-13-04 01:57 PM by Kagemusha
If Iraq asks the US to leave, will it leave?

"Yes."

"No."

Looks like that's our straight answer.

Or perhaps...

To Congress: "Yes."

To Iraq: "No."

Perhaps this makes more sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. This will put Bush further in the hole
The American people will see through this also.

Take the 27 reasons for going into Iraq and add 28. We are there to protect their freedom from their neighbors. Just you wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Platt Amendment, anyone?
Seems like that, a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Major Military Bases World-Wide
The occupiers remain forever, check Germany... and these are just the major ones.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/sites.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. World Map of US Military Bases--Welcome to the Roman Empire
Interesting stats:
46 countries without bases
196 countries WITH bases
63 countries with bases and troops
7 countries with 13 NEW bases and troops since 9/11

Download your very own copy at this website.

http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=884

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. kerry should use this in an ad side by side with bu$h's lies about
being on both sides of the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. a couple of things
Powell and Bremer's comments weren't about whether the Iraqi interim govt could "force" the US out - it was whether the US troops would leave if the new government "asked" them to leave. So the answer doesn't quite respond to Powell or Bremer's comments.

Second, in several places I have read comments like this.. the Iraqi leaders want us to stay.... ER there haven't been elections - doesn't this give even further lie to the "self-determination" of the IRaqi's if we already know who the leaders will be after the elections? They are getting careless in their choice of language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. I smell a flip-flop!
We need to get the hell out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. flippity floppity flippity floppity: a new story every day! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
27. So, we really are "invaders", and not "liberators",then?
Can we just drop the pretense and BS and call a spade a spade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC