http://www.forbes.com/business/energy/2004/05/12/cx_da_0512topnews.htmlNEW YORK - At the start of the Iraq war some cynics said the "real" reason for the war was "oil," though it was never really clear what they meant. If they meant the idea was to get cheap oil from the Middle East, today's news that oil prices have again spiked above $40 per barrel would have been a shock. But if the idea was that oil companies and oil services companies would do well, they may have a point, though these particular cynics still have the problem of proving cause and effect.
U.S. light crude topped $40 per barrel--less than $1 off the all-time high of $41.15 for New York crude futures, reached in October 1990 after Iraq invaded Kuwait. There seem to be two schools of thought on the reason for the recent climb. Some blame increased demand from growing industrial countries, especially China. Others credit supply disruptions caused by recent attacks on oil facilities in Iraq and Saudi Arabia.
<snip>
But these higher prices benefit producers such as OPEC nations and oil companies. Profits of major oil concerns like Exxon Mobil (nyse: XOM - news - people ), ChevronTexaco (nyse: CVX - news - people ) and BP (nyse: BP - news - people ) are up sharply in the past year, as are their share prices, which hit recent bottoms right at the start of the Iraq war, though that may be a coincidence.
The fortunes of oil services companies like Schlumberger (nyse: SLB - news - people ) and Halliburton (nyse: HAL - news - people ) have turned even more sharply. Schlumberger's share price is up by 48% since the start of the war; Halliburton's is up 42%, though it is still well below where it was at the time Dick Cheney, the company's former chief executive, became vice president of the United States. Wall Street is bullish for continued gains as Bear Stearns, Morgan Stanley and Lehman Brothers have all in the past year upgraded their ratings for Halliburton shares.
...more...