Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some Arab Newspapers Play Down or Ignore Beheading of American

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 08:56 AM
Original message
Some Arab Newspapers Play Down or Ignore Beheading of American
What I noticed was the AP not reporting on the Saudi comment about "legimate resistance to US occupation was to be expected" - implying this was "legitimate". So why does the US Media censor itself to keep the Saudi image "clean"?

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGA05CTG5UD.html

Some Arab Newspapers Play Down or Ignore Beheading of American

By Zeina Karam Associated Press Writer
Published: May 12, 2004

BEIRUT, Lebanon (AP) - Arab media reacted cautiously Wednesday to the videotaped beheading of an American civilian by Islamic militants in Iraq, with some newspapers conspicuously playing it down or even ignoring it.

The biggest pan-Arab satellite television channels broadcast an edited version of the gruesome video, not showing the actual killing of Nick Berg, 26, of West Chester, Pa., a Philadelphia suburb. The businessman was abducted in April.

In one of the most explicit displays, Kuwait's Al-Siyassah daily ran a photo of a masked militant holding up Berg's severed head. <snip>

<snip>Most Lebanese newspapers, such as the left-wing As-Safir, published the report and a photograph of Berg sitting in front of the militants. As-Safir ran the headline: "Al-Zarqawi slaughters an American to avenge Iraqi prisoners."

In many Arab newspapers, the beheading received less display than the news of America's imposing sanctions on Syria and the killing of six Israeli soldiers in Gaza City.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because US doesn't want its people to understand
The news of America's imposing sanctions on Syria and the killing of six Israeli soldiers in Gaza City.

And the above was the Big News in the Region.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The Saudi comment made the BBC morning news - but the US media
is ignoring it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. The cycle goes on



"We were winning international sympathy because of what happened at Abu Ghraib, but they come and waste it all," said Abdullah Sahar, a Kuwait University political scientist, said of the Islamic militants responsible.

9/11, international sympathy for US. Bush and invasion of Iraq - international outrage.

Bush and invasion of Iraq - international sympathy for victims of occupation. Murder of Nick Berg - international outrage.

And so it goes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Nick Berg was so fortunate for the CIA/DOD
Edited on Wed May-12-04 09:29 AM by jmcgowanjm
Almost like it was timed to get Taguba off
the lead.

""After the torture and vile acts by the American army,
President Bush goes out and congratulates Rumsfeld. It's
just incredible. I am in total shock," said the editor of
the influential Algerian national daily al-Watan. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. And oil at $40/bbl
Watch inventory announcement w/in
the hour.

World population will have to adjust to lesser food supplies
by a reduction in population. Pimentel and Pimentel (1996)
state: ... the nations of the world must develop a plan to
reduce the global population from near 6 billion to about
2 billion. If humans do not control their numbers, nature
will." Because stopping and then turning around the freight
train of population growth can only be done gradually, this
is a project which should be started now (Cohen, 1995). If
it is not done, famine on a large scale is likely to ensue.

http://www.oilcrash.com/petroleum.htm

Everthing will be done to keep the
status quo. Everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. exactly... maintain the status quo
because as soon as that goes, all hell breaks loose. As long as the sheeple are warm and well fed, they will see nothing, hear nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. from your link:
Oil Crash.com

"Kennedy (1993) summarizes both concern and hope for the future:

What is clear is that as the Cold War fades away, we face not a "new world order" but a troubled and fractured planet, whose problems deserve the serious attention of politicians and publics alike... The pace and complexity of the forces for change are enormous and daunting; yet it still may be possible for intelligent men and women to lead their societies through the complex task of preparing for the century ahead. If these challenges are not met, however, humankind will have only itself to blame for the troubles and disasters that could be lying ahead (p. 349)."

from the last line:

"humankind will have only itself to blame for the troubles and disasters that could be lying ahead (p. 349)."

Bush will try to blame humankind.

But humankind won't let him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Smith Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. We are rather arrogant aren't we?
U.S. papers mostly play down or ignore the killing of Iraqis. The U.S. government has a policy of not even counting them. To the U.S., they don't even rise to the importance of a statistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankieT Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. absolutely right -eom-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC