The rantings of Mogambo, again
http://www.321gold.com/editorials/daughty/daughty051204.htmlHe continues "By the end of 1970's, bonds had been dubbed 'certificates of confiscation' and being bullish on America was hazardous to one's financial health. The idea that stocks could provide positive investment returns was radical and socially risqué at the proverbial cocktail party." As those witty wags at the Daily Reckoning say "Stocks do not go up over the long run; they go nowhere. Up. Down. Sideways. Nowhere."
snip>
The statistics are pretty grim. After inflation and taxes, investment returns over the long term are almost zero. The correct interpretation of this surprising result is that you are merely getting back your own money. Admittedly, you get back MORE dollars than you put in, but each of those dollars is worth less. So you saved fifty cents when you were working, which was the price of a loaf of bread back then, and you got back a dollar in retirement now, which is the current price of a loaf of bread.
Mark Thornton at Mises.com commented on this in his essay, "The 'New Economists' and the Great Depression of the 1070's." He writes, "The experiments of the new economists also resulted in higher price inflation, as would be expected from the 'stimulating' fiscal and monetary policy of the 1960s. From the beginning of 1946 to the beginning of 1965 the consumer price index increased by 71.4%, but then increased 20% by the end of the decade. From 1965-when the experiment began in earnest-to the end of 1980 the CPI increased by 176.6%. The experiment had tripled the rate of inflation experienced by consumers."
Do you know of an investment that provided those kinds of returns? No. Nobody does. Therefore, everybody lost purchasing power, because prices went up faster than their profits.
snip>
He goes on, "Debt is by nature deflationary. Debt is the raw material from which fiat money is manufactured. Therefore, all attempts to outrun deflation by printing an ever-accelerating amount of money are doomed to fail because as debt grows much more rapidly than nature's limits allow income to grow, reversing the inflation of the money supply to a deflation is inevitable."
I am looking at the strength of the dollar, and I say to nobody in particular "Yow! A dollar that gets stronger?"
snip>
So I get out my crayons and my calculator, and I note that the budget deficit is $550 billion a year now, and that is using wildly optimistic assumptions that never work out in real life, like, for instance, that the budget will only compound by 4% per year for the next five years. So that means by the time this hypothetical John Snow's Miracle Five Year Plan is done with, which ought to be about, oh, say five years from now, so mark your calendars, we will be ANOTHER $3.3 trillion more in debt! And we will STILL have a freaking budget deficit of $351 billion a damn year! This is GOOD news? This is the damned GOOD news with? Just the interest ALONE, at a measly 6%, on this new debt will eat up $198 billion of tax revenues! So am I supposed to think that this is something that I want to call up my kids about, waking them up at 3 a.m., so I can tell them the wonderful freaking news that in five years we are going to be another $3.3 TRILLION dollars in debt? And this is just the blangity-blang, dangity ding dong damned OPTIMISTIC plan? This is the BEST that he, and all his little playmates in government, can figure out? This is the gooooooooood news? And here is where the Mogambo steps back from the microphone, his voice trailing away until the echoes die down in the misty distance, and then there is only silence. He spreads his arms, or better yet make that "spreads his muscular and manly arms with muscles that rippled in a manly way." The audience is hushed, and they lean forward in their seats, straining their ears towards the stage upon which the Mogambo now stands, his manly and powerful jaw thrust defiantly forward. The Mogambo opens his mouth and says "And this - this! - is a country that is going to have a currency that gets stronger? Hahahahaha!"
snip>
To show you the utter insanity of Alan Greenspan, we have this. "We have, I believe, a reasonably good understanding of why Americans have been able to reach farther into global markets, incur significant increases in debt, and yet fail to produce the disruptions so often observed as a consequence." Well, well, well! For the first time in history, somebody has figured out how to amass crushing debts and NOT have it destroy the economy! And not only that, but he has a GOOD understanding of it! And the answer is, give me a drum roll please, market forces! He rhetorically asks "Can market forces incrementally defuse a buildup in a nation's current account deficit and net external debt before a crisis more abruptly does so?"
After spending his entire freaking career providing more money and credit so as to finance the world's all-time record-setting bubbles of debt in every market that you can name, NOW he takes the time to ask if market forces can take care of debt? Hahaha!
I see you raising your hand, wanting me to call on you so you can ask me a question that I probably can't answer and then I get all embarrassed. But instead of calling on you, I close my eyes,and Mogambo the Mentalist will read your mind! I close my eyes, and concentrate concentrate concentrate. You want to know how can "market forces" perform this miracle, this towering achievement that has eluded every other dirtbag government and every other dirtbag economist and every other dirtbag central bank in the entire history of the world? The answer is "market flexibility!" You heard me! He actually says "The answer seems to lie with the degree of market flexibility." Market flexibility! Of course! Market flexibility!
Greenspan goes on to say, and I know that he is hard to hear over my insane laughing and hooting in utter contempt and I keep making these rude sounds like I am having severe digestive-tract distress and am passing large quantities of gas, "In a world economy that is sufficiently flexible, as debt projections rise, product and equity prices, interest rates, and exchange rates presumably would change to reestablish global balance" My God! Why didn't I see it before? I slap my forehead in wonder! It all seems so simple when he explains it! In every other instance of the build-up of huge, bankrupting debt, we did not have, let me check that list again, product and equity prices! And interest rates were, of course, completely absent! And let's not forget that exchange rates were always completely non-existent! So NATURALLY "global balance" was not restored in those bad old days!
more...