Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: General Overseeing Prison Says She Was Overruled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:00 PM
Original message
WP: General Overseeing Prison Says She Was Overruled
The U.S. general who was in charge of running prisons in Iraq told Army investigators earlier this year that she had resisted decisions by superior officers to hand over control of the prisons to military intelligence officials and to authorize the use of lethal force as a first step in keeping order -- command decisions that have come in for heavy criticism in the Iraq prison abuse scandal.

Brig. Gen. Janis L. Karpinski, head of the 800th Military Police Brigade, spoke of her resistance to the decisions in a detailed account of her tenure furnished to Army investigators. It places two of the highest-ranking Army officers now in Iraq, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller and Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, at the heart of decision-making on both matters.

Karpinski has been formally admonished by the Army for her actions in Iraq. She said both men overruled her concerns about the military intelligence takeover and the use of deadly force.

Each man contests portions of her account, which appears in the classified annex to the Army's internal probe into the abuse and torture of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison. Her account was described by a U.S. government official to The Washington Post and confirmed by her attorney.

Karpinski's account surfaced on the same day another officer accused by the Army of wrongdoing in the scandal, Lt. Col. Jerry L. Phillabaum, released an official rebuttal stating that Abu Ghraib perpetually lacked key resources and personnel, and that the leadership above him was almost entirely unresponsive to his requests for help.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19081-2004May11.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. There's disagreement here, so maybe between
all the conflicting stories we can piece together the truth. I hope everyone they try to finger for this has a different version, that way maybe the whole adminstration will go down with this ship,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ender Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. er... excuse me?
>to hand over control of the prisons to military intelligence officials
>and to authorize the use of lethal force as a first step in keeping
>order

lethal force as a *first* step?

yeh - shoot a couple if anyone acts up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Janis nails Miller square between the eyes.
According to Karpinski's account, it was Sanchez who decided in November 2003 to loosen the military's rules of engagement so that the guards would be freer to use lethal force at the outset of any disturbance. His decision came in a meeting with Karpinski that both officers recall, but Sanchez -- who was asked to comment by The Post -- yesterday gave a different account.

The backdrop for their discussion was a riot at Abu Ghraib on the afternoon of Nov. 24, organized by prisoners distressed at the lack of proper food and clothing, their isolation from any family contact and their indeterminate detentions. In the melee, nine U.S. soldiers were injured, three detainees were killed by military police and nine other detainees were wounded.


<snip>

Karpinski told Taguba that Sanchez expressed disappointment to her that the guard force had not used lethal firepower from the outset to put down the riot. She said yesterday through her lawyer that Sanchez said, "I'm tired of this MP mentality; I want them to shoot first and use nonlethal force later."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Sounds like they were being abused before the abuse started
"..riot at Abu Ghraib on the afternoon of Nov. 24, organized by prisoners distressed at the lack of proper food and clothing, their isolation from any family contact and their indeterminate detentions."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Wow, The cross hairs seem to focus on Sanchez... Now why
would Sanchez think it's just alright to shoot these people down in cold blood? Sanchez was brainwashed by who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. It all still fits to me.
Like Senator Warner said today, everybody is 'ducking and bobbing'. She sounds like she may have a get-out-of-jail-free card to play.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Col Pappas is now under investigation
I believe he'll hold the key to her get out of jail free card....and the Miller/Boykin relationship will be exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can we draw any conclusions yet?
One thing I think I'm seeing is overt military resistance to the party line. This general already has an attorney, and is naming names? Whatever happened to "take one for the team"?

I believe DoD regulations prevent soldiers from speaking contemptuously of civilian leadership. So what's going to happen if the dominos fall straight through the Pentagon and tap the glass entrance to Donald Rumsfeld's suite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Pass the popcorn will ya
and you are right, this is going to lead directly to Rummy's office

Oh boy,

Hold the butter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shadder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Goes higher than that
There is a coverup taking place right now that is designed to make it appear that Bush knew about this much latter than he really did and not as much as he really knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. at least some dem sens agree: Senators suspect higher-ups directed abuses
~snip~
Specifically, Democratic senators pointed to the Pentagon decision to send Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller to Iraq in August from his post as commander of the U.S. prison in Guantanamo, Cuba, where several hundred detainees linked to al Qaeda and Afghanistan's Taliban are being held and interrogated. His mission was to figure out how to improve intelligence collected through interrogations of Iraqi detainees.

Miller recommended establishing a joint interrogation center at Abu Ghraib, and Taguba testified that tactical control of the Abu Ghraib facility was taken from Karpinski and turned over to Col. Thomas Pappas, a military intelligence colonel. The abuse documented in photographs that have caused an international furor started in October, not long after Miller's recommended changes took place.

Taguba's report said this structure "set the conditions" for the guards to help the interrogators -- possibly leading to the abuses -- by preparing the prisoners for questioning.

Stephen Cambone, the undersecretary of defense for intelligence, defended the arrangement at Abu Ghraib that divided authority between Pappas and Karpinski. He maintained that Pappas, the military intelligence chief, did not control the military police guarding the prisoners.

But Taguba disagreed, saying it was his understanding that Pappas had authority over the MPs.

~snip~

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/05/12/MNGMO6K22P1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. "Take one for the team"
That's a game women weren't taught to play, I suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synergy Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. If this was how CENTCOM generals made their decisions
no wonder the US is losing the war in Iraq. I have no doubt that Brig. Gen. Karpinski was played by both Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller and Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, but Karpinski has to be such an incompetent fool in order to claim her innocence. I find it puzzling that so far no one seems to know to whom did Col. Thomas Pappas, Commander of 205th Military Intelligence Brigade, report? If anyone knows, please let me know.

The only good thing coming out of this whole mess is that the longer it drags on, the more likely to bring down the higher-ups. But Janis, next time please try to use maybe tape recorders, digital cameras, or a paper trail to CYA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, Karpinski wasn't too smart in the way she didn't document anything
to cover her existing story. I'm surprised at how little anyone knows. For instance Lt. General Alexander did not know about the Red Cross Report until last week.

Major General Burgess said the story about softening up the prisoners was not true.

Major General Romig wasn't much better at answering direct questioning.

I wish someone would put up a chain of command, I have no idea who was responsible for who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. I am virtually certain there is a paper trail. This is the Army, ok?
Edited on Wed May-12-04 11:27 AM by TacticalPeak
The specified limits of Taguba's investigation stopped quite abruptly at the brigade HQ and included only "MP's" v. MI. Anyone tailoring their 'recollection' of 'conversations' to Taguba's report should be advised that it is only part of the record.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is continually overlooked
and all the Generals testifying before the Senate obfuscated or denied specifics revealed in the investigation, claiming there were 5 or 6 investigations underway.

How can they claim ignorance with that many investigations underway?

It seems they order investigations as the solutions, but never address the issues the investigations are concerned with.

They just carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. What time is it? It's CYA time !
Notice that all these general officers are starting to cover their own butts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. The fingerpointing has started
The armed forces has an official name for the fix they've gotten themselves into.

It's called a "clusterfuck". (sorry mods)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is the part that really gets to me:
"Karpinski recalled that Miller told her he wanted to "Gitmo-ize" the prison"

Actually, every time I hear someone say "Gitmo" I cringe. It's like the Bush administration has institutionalized illegal and indefinite detention/torture and now it's just a casual, routine thing to talk about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverpatronus Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. this is going all the way to the top!
every military person involved in this is pointing the finger upward. the buck isn't stopping until it gets to the oval office!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC