Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld Stops Short of Direct Apology Over Abuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:14 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld Stops Short of Direct Apology Over Abuses
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040505/pl_nm/iraq_abuse_rumsfeld_dc&cid=615&ncid=1480

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said on Wednesday "any American" felt apologetic for abuses of Iraqi prisoners by U.S. soldiers but stopped short of offering a direct apology himself.


Asked on ABC's morning television show whether he would like to apologize to the Iraqi people, he replied: "Oh my goodness, any American who sees the photographs that we have seen has to feel apologetic to the Iraqi people who were abused and recognize that that is something that is unacceptable and un-American."


Rumsfeld was asked at a news conference on Tuesday whether he would offer an apology to the Iraqi people over abuses by U.S. soldiers at an Iraqi prison. He declined to give one then.


Photographs showing Iraqi prisoners stripped of their clothes and being humiliated and abused have badly damaged U.S. prestige and credibility, especially in the Arab world. There has also been anger at home and Congress has called for public hearings on the scandal.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rummy thinks he's a Waffen SS officer
Yep, I said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I watched that....
He is a putrid piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lil-petunia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. comparisons
He was also given a questions comparing the rape, torture, murder etc of Iraqi prisoners by Saddam and the rape, torture, murder etc of Itaqi prisoners by US military intellegence (!?!), CIA and reservists. he said there was no comparison.


But we forget. This administration and all the key parts making it up are genetically incapable of apologies, any more than they are willing to admit mistakes. That's because they hear voices, which only they assume is god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. I am sure there was a big difference to...
Edited on Wed May-05-04 09:52 AM by NNN0LHI
...those Iraqis who were raped, tortured, murderd, etc.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Another Bill C. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Today host referred to
the abuses as "humiliation of prisoners" in the opening of the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yes, Katie Couric is a Bush enabler..
She always runs cover for the WH mistakes and will not say anything derogatory about the Bush family or the Administration..

She should be removed as anchor from nbc news for the distortion and discriminatory reportage of facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Condi and DeLay call it mistreatment... These people just don't get it!
"Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, publicly apologized to the Arab world for the mistreatment, and White House officials said President Bush would appear on Arab television in an effort to counter the damage."

<snip>

"But while condemnation of the reported abuses came from both sides of the political aisle, members split along party lines over the question of whether Congress should conduct special hearings into the allegations. Several Democrats urged such a move, but Republicans DeLay and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee opposed the idea, saying regular congressional committees could provide sufficient oversight.

"I'm sure that our committees are going to be asking the right questions," DeLay said. "But a full-fledged congressional investigation -- that's like saying we need an investigation every time there's police brutality on the street."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/washpost/20040505/ts_washpost/a2179_2004may4&e=2&ncid=1480
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wonder if ol' Tom would want an investigation if someone
stripped his ol' ass off nekkid and stacked him up with some other fellers and then stuck an electrode in the old sub, one in each hand, and gave 'im a little shock?

(No use putting a hood on him, he's got some at home!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I hope the pending indictment of DeLay is successful...
(No use putting a hood on him, he's got some at home!)

Thats why I think the treatment of the Iraqis screams of racist undertones. KKK hoods/Iraqi Hoods- no difference..

The INTERNET should be flooded with pictures of the commonality of the racism until the horror makes it to mainstream news.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just like a Republican
can't step up to the plate. What a pitiful excuse for a human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rumsfeld knows his hypnotic hand gestures can fool anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFWJock Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Rumsfeld:
"Do I wish it wouldnt have happened? Yes
Do I plan to apologize? No
Did I say I knew where the WMD's were? Yes
Did we find them there? No
Do I like it when I ask myself questions and then I answer them? Yes"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. links to trancript/video and highlights of rummy's crap....read it
you'll quickly realize that all the bush* spin about 'rummy came close to apologizing' is simply today/s wildly spinning garbage out of the the bush* administration....

....I cried for my country today....this behavior by high level bush* appointees is totally immoral and unethical....


----------------------------

Defense Department Operational Update Briefing
(Also participating; Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Peter Pace)

SEC. RUMSFELD: Good afternoon.

-snips-

_____________________________

major increases of troops in Iraq

_____________________________

Finally, on a different subject, General Abizaid has now indicated his desire to retain the current level of forces in Iraq, roughly 135,(000), (1)38,000 forces, for longer than the 90 days that we recently extended about 20,000 forces to get up to that higher figure.


___________________________________

on American soldiers torturing and killing POWs....

_________________________________

Q .....I guess I'd ask you more broadly, is this a major setback for U.S. efforts in Iraq?

SEC. RUMSFELD: Oh, I'm not one for instant history, Charlie. The fact is this is an exception.....


_________________________________

claims that they haven't read the reports, and haven't seen the photos of American Soldiers torturing and KILLING POWs

____________________________________


Q Mr. Secretary, General Myers said on Sunday that he had not seen the report. I don't believe you had seen the report even if -- I don't know if you have now. Isn't this something you would have liked to have been flagged about? ....


SEC. RUMSFELD: .... It takes time for reports to be finished -- correction -- to be gathered. This is a very comprehensive report. There are a number of -- I listed six investigations that are in various stages. And they move up in a process, as General Pace described. And it seems to me that the people who should be seeing it at each stage were seeing it at each stage.



Q But to plan for a response. I mean, it's been one week now since it was on "60 Minutes II." It's the first time we've heard you talk about it. In effect, the damage has already been done. There didn't seem to be a plan to even deal with this.



SEC. RUMSFELD: Are you critiquing the Department of Defense's PR handling of it? Is that what the question is?



Q I'll leave that to you.



SEC. RUMSFELD: I mean, the fact of the matter is that this is a serious problem. And it's something that the department is addressing.



The system works. The system works. There were some allegations of abuse in a detention facility in Iraq. It was reported in the chain of command. Immediately it was announced to the public. Immediately an investigation was initiated. Six separate investigations have been undertaken over a period of months since January.



Q (Off mike.)



SEC. RUMSFELD: January 16th. February, March, April. Three months. These things are under way.



I recognize the appetite of people for instant information and instant conclusions. These things are complicated. ....




_________________________________

on why Congress wasn't told....

_______________________________________


Q But you gave no idea of the scale of what –



SEC. RUMSFELD: We didn't know the scale.



Q Well, you did when this report came back -- when General Taguba's report came back, and that was in -- that's been available for quite some time. Members of Congress are outraged that they're just hearing about it today.



Q General, a quick follow-up on that, please. Could you explain to us why the Taguba report was classified secret, no foreign distribution?......


GEN. PACE: First of all, I do not know specifically why it was labeled secret....But as the secretary pointed out, immediately we told the world that we thought we had a problem. So there has been no attempt to hide this.



Q Mr. Secretary, can you say why it was classified secret? Do you know?



SEC. RUMSFELD: No, you'd have to ask the classifier.


___________________________

on 'abuse' as opposed to 'torture' of POWs by American soldiers

________________________________



Q Mr. Secretary, a number of times from the podium you've said U.S. troops do not torture individuals. ......-- is this one of those rare exceptions here that torture took place?



SEC. RUMSFELD: I think that -- I'm not a lawyer. My impression is that what has been charged thus far is abuse, which I believe technically is different from torture.



Just a minute.



Q (Off mike.) SEC. RUMSFELD: I don't know if the -- it is correct to say what you just said, that torture has taken place, or that there's been a conviction for torture. And therefore I'm not going to address the torture word.


_____________________________

again, rumsfeld denies reading full report or seeing photos of American Soldiers torturing and killing POWs

______________________________________



Q Mr. Secretary, have you yet read the Taguba report?



SEC. RUMSFELD: It's -- which –



Q (Off mike.)



SEC. RUMSFELD: Yeah. You're -- I think you're talking about the executive summary. That's -- I've seen the executive summary, the –



Q Have you read through it, sir?



SEC. RUMSFELD: I've been through it. Whether -- have read every page -- no. There's a lot of references and documentation to laws and conventions and procedures and requirements. But I have certainly read the conclusions and the other aspects of it.




SEC. RUMSFELD: I think I did inquire about the pictures and was told that we didn't have copies.



(To staff.) Is that correct?



STAFF: We didn't have them here, that's for sure.



SEC. RUMSFELD: Yeah, I didn't have them.



STAFF: We didn't.


_____________________________

denial of any torture/abuse at American Prisons in Guantanamao Bay, Cuba or Afganistan ot Charleston or any other military prisons....

____________________________


Q Mr. Secretary, you mentioned the Navy looking into detention facilities in Guantanamo Bay and Charleston. Was that triggered by some allegations of abuse, or what are they looking at?



SEC. RUMSFELD: I'm not in the position to say whether -- there are other allegations of abuse. That is a pattern and a practice of terrorists, to allege abuse. We've seen that in their training, that they do that.....



Q Mr. Secretary, any indications thus far that this problem may be more widespread, that it may have taken place at other facilities in Iraq or Afghanistan, sir?



SEC. RUMSFELD: As I say, at any given time there are always allegations and charges of abuse in detention facilities, whether it's jails or prisons, military or civilian. That that is a pattern.....

_________________________

refusal to apologize to the Victims of abuse by American Soldiers

_______________________



Q Mr. Secretary, do you think, given what we do know so far, at least about the six individuals and their alleged actions, do you think it's legitimate to call for us to apologize, not only to the people that were specifically abused, but also to the Iraqi people?



SEC. RUMSFELD: I think you're -- I haven't been focused on the war of ideas, to be honest with you, since this issue -- with respect to this issue....

Yes?


Q Mr. Secretary, I did ask how you felt this episode has in fact damaged the U.S. efforts –


SEC. RUMSFELD: I've answered that. I answered that earlier. I'm not in a position to make a judgment. Time will tell. Clearly we would wish it would not because it is an exceptional, isolated....

______________________________________

nobody knows who will govern Iraq on June 30th
________________________________________




SEC. RUMSFELD: .....

It is a -- a transition period is a period of uncertainty. A period of uncertainty is something that causes people concern and worry and apprehension. We are -- we are today, whatever it is, May 5th, 4th, heading towards June 30th, or thereabouts, to pass sovereignty and responsibility, political responsibility for that country to the Iraqis. It very likely will be in something approximating what the U.N. special representative, Mr. Brahimi, recommended. Who those people are is not known at the present time. And therefore people wonder, are we in, are we out, how do we feel about the people that might get that responsibility. And so expect that kind of uncertainty during this period. It's inevitable.

__________________________

on Fallujah

_____________________________



Q Could you just quickly clarify the situation in Fallujah? We have Marine commanders signing off on this first General Saleh, and then he was out. Now there's another general on the Iraqi forces; he's in. What is the situation?



SEC. RUMSFELD: I'm told that this individual named Saleh was recommended by someone on the Iraqi Governing Council, and was asked to, at a lower level in the U.S. CENTCOM command, to begin assisting and organizing Iraqis to help out in Fallujah. He had some success. At that point there was a vetting process that took place in the public.



And that -- I should caution you, this has happened a lot in Iraq. You try to vet against a list -- a database. But the real vetting comes when someone's head pops up. People look at him and say, no, no. And a public vetting is going on for mayors, for police chiefs, for Iraqi governors. For lots of times, people have been put in and eventually taken out.



In this case, this man -- the vetting was imperfect. There are not conclusions that he has blood on his hands at this moment. I've not seen anything that's definitive or conclusive.




_____________________________________________


full transcript here...for this overview, only tiny clips off major paragraphs have been included, and only a few paragraphs...the whole transcript is considerably longer...-snips- are designed to give readers a very shortened overview and encourage reading complete transcript....
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20040504-secdef1423.html

here's the video link
http://www.defenselink.mil/briefings/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Since Rumsfeld claims he doesn't know...
Can anyone tell me the 'technical' difference between abuse and torture? Rumsfeld employs a common tactic when he claims that it isn't torture, but then declines to describe the difference between that and abuse.

Anyone know how these two are different regarding U.S. and relevant international law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Off the top of my head, I'd say. . .
torture is what your enemy does, abuse is what the same act is called when you do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Aaaahhh... I wondered if there was a perverse twist to it!
Leave it to Rummy to create such a devious delineation! The Doctor of Dissemination has deigned to describe the disaster, but declines to define!


sorry- I couldn't help myself :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. it's real scary when you read the transcript, instead of news spin

anyone who actually saw rumsfeld perform must have been agast....

these bush* criminals need to be put into JAIL....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. Rummy says "the system works" but we wouldn't even be talking about this
if it hadn't been for the "60 Minutes" expose. Rummy hasn't even read the Executive Summary of the report. No way was he going to comment on this if the media (finally!) hadn't done their job. And another thing - speak for yourself and apologize for yourself, Rummy. You don't speak for all Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. Lies from Rumsfeld
Quote frm Rumsfeld: "The system works. There were some allegations of abuse in a detention facility in Iraq. It was reported in the chain of command. Immediately it was announced to the public. Immediately an investigation was initiated. Six separate investigations have been undertaken over a period of months since January."

If the investigations started in January, how was it immediately announced to the public in April? He says it was reported through the chain of command. The AP reported that the investigation started after a soldier who saw the photos placed an annonymous note under an officer's door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
webtrainer Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. He just wants it to go away . . .
but he's the one most at fault (except for the co-pResidents) and should get fired and brought up in Int'l Court.

From WaPo editorial:
------------
The foundation for the crimes at Abu Ghraib was laid more than two years ago, when Mr. Rumsfeld instituted a system of holding detainees from Afghanistan not only incommunicado, without charge, and without legal process, but without any meaningful oversight mechanism at all. Brushing off his violation of the Geneva Conventions, Mr. Rumsfeld maintained that the system was necessary to extract important intelligence.
-------------
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2372-2004May4.html
(subscription req'd)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC