Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Criticizes Justice for Publishing Memos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 06:05 PM
Original message
White House Criticizes Justice for Publishing Memos
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House on Thursday lodged a rare complaint with the Justice Department for making public documents that blame a Democratic member of the panel investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks for hampering terror investigations.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan, in a highly unusual move, said President Bush was disappointed Attorney General John Ashcroft's department had declassified and made public 29 pages of documents relating to Democratic commissioner Jamie Gorelick's time as deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration.

The department posted the documents on its Web site late on Wednesday as "supplementary material" to Ashcroft's testimony to the panel earlier this month.

"We were not involved in it," McClellan said. "The president was disappointed about that .... He's disappointed that that information was placed on their Web site like that."

The documents include instructions on separation of foreign counterintelligence and criminal investigations, reactions to the instructions and even hand-written notes from Gorelick regarding the so-called wall that governs intelligence uses.

~snip~
more: http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=4992199

And then bush winks at Asscrack and says...it okay don't worry about it bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Trying to do a little PR to recoup total loss of credibility, eh?
Actually,...they are merely drawing more attention to the whole bullshitzka about Jamie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And Reuters writes the story exactly the way that want it. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is all PR
I was in favor of making the memos public... and in the spirit of openness, * should now make his testimony public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MO_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wink, wink, nod, nod,
GeeDub says to Asscroft, "Your job is safe for as long as mine is".

Dang, there I go making that recurrent typo again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Baloney - in one of the many books I've
read recently, it points out that bush & co encourage their higher ups to "out" things, they will speak out in public against, and then protect them - like Ashcroft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Claire Beth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't believe him for a second! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Attorney General can declassify documents?
That is one I need to look up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. N/M.. looks like he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Only because they're who classified them in the first place.
The process for declassifying documents usually requires the person, agency, or department that originally classified them to approve/review their declassification. While there are, of course, exceptions this is the 'normal' process. (It's often one of the FOIA bottlenecks.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bet this one will piss the freepers off big time, 'eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. NYT- White House Criticizes Justice Dept. Over Papers
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/30/politics/30ASHC.html?ei=5062&en=7c06030d2f2fe6ac&ex=1083902400&pagewanted=print&position=

April 30, 2004
White House Criticizes Justice Dept. Over Papers

By ERIC LICHTBLAU

ASHINGTON, April 29 — President Bush was disappointed with the Justice Department for publicly releasing documents that appeared to take aim at a Democratic member of the Sept. 11 commission for her counterterrorism work a decade ago, the White House said Thursday.

"The president does not believe we ought to be pointing fingers in this time period," Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, told reporters, "We ought to be working together to help the commission complete its work."

In an administration that prides itself on its unified message, it is rare for the White House publicly to chide any of the president's senior advisers. Mr. McClellan's rebuke came in response to the Justice Department's release on Wednesday of 29 pages of declassified documents related to the department's internal discussions in 1995 about the sharing of intelligence information among prosecutors and investigators. A Republican senator said on Wednesday that he and other lawmakers had asked that the documents be released.

Attorney General John Ashcroft has publicly accused Jamie Gorelick, a Democratic member of the Sept. 11 commission who was the No. 2 official in the Justice Department in 1995, of building up the "wall" that restricted the flow of information in terrorism cases before the Sept. 11 attacks.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clyde39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Blame is central to Ashcroft's persona
The more I read about this man to more I'm aware of just how one-deminsional he is. When he covered the statue it was obvious that he had major "issues"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC