Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghanistan faces $4bn defence funding shortfall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 09:08 AM
Original message
Afghanistan faces $4bn defence funding shortfall
Source: Guardian

Afghanistan's security forces face a $4bn (£2.5bn) funding shortfall after 2014 – when they are supposed to take over the main responsibility for fighting the insurgency – raising questions over whether the Kabul government will have the resources to keep the Taliban at bay, the Guardian has learned.

The Afghan army and police combined are now about 308,000 strong, and are due to reach their peak strength of 352,000 by the end of next year. The current western strategy is for the Afghan national security forces (ANSF) to take on an increasing share in the fighting, allowing the US, Britain and their allies to withdraw all their troops from combat by 2014 and focus on training and counter-terrorist operations.

However, a 352,000-strong ANSF is estimated to cost $8bn and US officials have told their European counterparts that Washington is only prepared to foot $3bn of that bill after 2014. Other donors are expected to come up with another $1bn, enough to finance a force of only 220,000 troops.

Foreign and Afghan officials in Kabul agree such force would only be able to hold the line against the insurgents if there was a breakthrough in peace talks, or a collapse in the Taliban, both of which currently look unlikely.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/01/afghanistan-faces-defence-funding-shortfall
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obvious result of houses built on sand.
Afghanistan was never going to able to field a western style military. That was an MIC pipedream who wanted another dumping ground for outdated equipment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hardtravelin Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Outdated?
When I was there last year (going back over in January) their shit was newer than ours! What a goddamn waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just because it is new doesn't mean it is outdated.
The US never gives out the new stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. We teach them how to fight war our style
and where will they get the rsources to do it once we leave?

We saw this story in Cambodia and Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sorry; but I'd like to make that shortfall even larger. We're all outta IOU's, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Reduce the size of the forces or get more donors.
Let's be clear though on our foreign policy in Central Asia. Seeing Afghanistan descend into chaos is in no one's interests. We need to be more aggressive and creative in our counter-insurgency strategy :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC