Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Penn State scandal: Judge had ties to Jerry Sandusky charity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 07:30 AM
Original message
Penn State scandal: Judge had ties to Jerry Sandusky charity
Source: Los Angeles Times

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett said Sunday that he expected more victims to surface in the child sex abuse scandal that has rocked Penn State, and he spoke of the need for a new state law requiring that abuse allegations be made to government authorities.

Meanwhile, a news outlet reported that the judge who granted unsecured bail for alleged molester Jerry Sandusky is a volunteer for Sandusky's charity.

Deadspin said: Although "prosecutors requested $500,000 bail and that Sandusky be required to wear a leg monitor," Judge Leslie Dutchcot ordered Sandusky freed on $100,000 unsecured bail. She ordered that he "pay nothing unless he failed to show up for a court hearing."

Newsman Keith Olbermann, among others, tweeted his outrage at the report: "Beyond belief: Judge who set unsecured bail for #PennState figure Sandusky is a volunteer for Sandusky's charity."

Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2011/11/penn-state-judge-second-mile-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Surely she should have recused herself
I can't see how she can justify not doing so. Or at least making it public and asking another judge whether they thought she was suitable to take the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. "justify"?? that's for commoners.. not the elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. money talks, pervert walks. If he's big in
Penn State football, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. That should be a bumper sticker - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
52. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracydiva Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
58. When it comes to
protecting the criminal elites, "Don't look backward. Let's look forward." Unless, of course, you give a damn about truth and justice..

Penn State is the tip of the iceberg and the MSM are complicit in the cover-up. Please consider the following:

Listen to this excellent interview with two authors about pedophilia and sex trafficking in high places:

A story of power brokers, child abuse and betrayal.. Cover-ups by federal law enforcement, blackmail, death, etc.
http://www.radiodujour.com/mp3/20100628-peter-b-collins-nick-bryant.mp3 ...or go to
http://franklinscandal.com/

Also see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSc3An5YYMQ (movie trailer)
"Rachel Weiz plays a poor Nebraska cop who takes a U.N. job in postwar Bosnia to investigate the sex trafficking of young women, including two Ukrainians, and unearths evidence of multinational peacekeeper complicity in the crimes (and U.S. government support of the whole ugly racket)."

Where is the outrage over the starving young Iraqi girls and women who have turned to prostitution as refugees in Syria and Jordan? You want to see pornography the of war?...Google, Images: Injured Iraqi children..or Palestinian children courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #58
69. There was a recent, hugely important bust
of super rich pedophiles in the US. The porn was what caused the bust, but the underlying crap is the real problem.

They imported kids from Haiti, kidnapped kids from "white" countries, and would even share them with friends.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. Remember that Baptist church that got caught kidnapping kids from Haiti?
"According to Bellerive, some of the children were not orphans and were asking about their parents. Haitian officials contacted the American ambassador "to let them know that there was American citizens involved in kidnapping."

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/HaitiEarthquake/haiti-earthquake-ten-americans-charged-child-trafficking-haiti/story?id=9712436#.TsGBKhfEtXs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #71
78. I did forget. Funny how these stories die out, while
blonde besotted bimbo stories never die. Or worse, john beret ramsey tales continue to bubble up into the media limelight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting
Joepa retained the same criminal attorney that defended GHW Bush in the Iran Contra scandal.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Unsecured bail means that Sandusky had to put up NO money for bail
and doesn't owe it unless he fails to show up for his 9 Nov meeting. Basically released on his own recognizance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waddirum Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. November 9 was five days age
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
32. December 9
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. She definitely sounds like SCOTUS material. A female Scalia. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
41. Wouldn't Surprise Me If
This is a Judge appointed by a Democrat because when is the last time a Republican was known to volunteer for an organization devoted to troubled children unless it was church based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. The last time?
Well, that would be Sandusky, wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Ben Nelson is Dem. Remember when Joe Lieberman was a Dem.
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 12:47 PM by valerief
And Max Baucus. Blue Dog Dems hate the 99% cuz they always vote against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
60. This judge was elected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. What does the public really know about any Judge, personally -- ? Sandusky "heart of gold" --!!
That was Sandusky's rep in his community -- !!

And police were reciting it to one or more of the mothers who were complaining

about Sandusky's behavior with their children -- like taking showers with them!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DallasNE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Judges Are Appointed
Then they face the voters on whether to be retained. They face no opponent in the election, just a yes or no vote on being retained. At least that is how it works where I live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. That's in Nebraska, and I know that this Penn. judge was elected
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 06:58 PM by alp227
but I don't know which governor appointed her. Apparently Penn. judges are not appointed by governor at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. More corruption in the Sports Church.
No surprise there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just when you thought this case couldn't get any worse
Now we have a corrupt judge in the mix. Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ragemage Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. So let me make sure I understand...
So this judge sets UNSECURED bail for this guy. Basically he walks in and walks out of the courthouse. He is now free to go home until the trial? Why oh why is he not held in the jail UNTIL the trial? WTF is up with that? How can this judge just let him walk without any bail or conditions? If I was the judge I would have to recuse myself just so I would not kill the bastard for what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. That pretty much sums it up, and yes...
...given the circumstances, she should have recused herself.

Bus these are the times we live in. People in positions of power and authority shoot from the hip and think they'll never get caught. You'd think they'd be familiar with a little thing called "THE INTERNET." Apparently they are not.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. Just abuse accusations?
Why don't you require ALL allegations be made to government authorities?

AND THEN, make it obligatory for the government authorities to respond. There is a glaring hole here. What makes you all so sure that the authorities won't mum up too for "important people" or institutions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. What gets me is, the judge had to know this would get scrutinized. How could she be so obvious?
Relatively low bail AND no leg monitor? For an accused pedophile who has been under investigation before AND who lives near an elementary school?

I wonder if either she did this action deliberately to draw people's attention & MAKE them dig deeper, but I also wonder, because of her involvement with his charity, if she's hoping that Sandusky or somebody else will dispense with him before the trial, so that there won't be a reason to dig any further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I think the answer is....she doesn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. The "low bail" was effectively no bail b/c he didn't have to pay anything up front.
My pet theory? TPTB are hoping Sandusky will take advantage of this unmonitored freedom and off himself, making the problem "go away" for any others involved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. I doubt he "will off himself", but he could be off'd.
A lot of people are exposed and don't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. That is certainly another possibility. And, without a monitor, it makes it
MUCH easier to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. Although when he was first caught (I believe in 1998) he said he wished he was dead.
So perhaps he is capable of killing himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
77. Maybe TPTB are hoping for that as an easier way to tie things up.
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 04:38 PM by tblue37
Ooops. I see someone else already mentioned this possibility. I often read the posts on a thread from bottom to top, so I missed the earlier post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
64. hmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Is this step in the process called 'setting bail'?. What's the terminology?
I'm asking because I'm curious if this step in the process has a legal application of
'setting a precedent'?

If the same event played out on a local level - say a grade school level where all the parties are also well known - could a lawyer use this Sandusky bail arrangement to get the same arrangement? In PA? Or any state?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. "state law requiring that abuse allegations be made to government authorities."
A similar law has been on the books in OH for decades. My mother was a preschool teacher and told me of many horror stories from children in the inner city of Columbus. She had to report these cases and sometimes give evidence in court. It really hurt her and took much from her psyche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. When does it stop being a "scandal" and start being a "crime?"
I've seen the word "scandal" connected with this crime in every news outlet since the story broke.

A "scandal" is what happens with a "family-values" Republican is caught in an affair. It's not illegal, but it's a scandal: the person is a liar and hypocrite.

However, I fail to see the "scandal" in this incidence. I see "crimes."

"Scandal" tends to lessen the severity of these "crimes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. When Rickie Santorum is a big supporter,
the criminal gets the same treatment as GOP lawbreakers.

Don't forget, Rickie tried to reward Sanduski while he was a senator, for being a pro adoption hero.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. I noticed that, too
Absolutely disgusting. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
70. This has both elements. In addition to the criminal acts alleged,
there is the scandal of Paterno not doing more even though his legal requirements were satisfied when he reported it to Penn State's AD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
23. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Amerigo Vespucci.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
25. So what is the charity?
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 11:27 AM by randome
The article doesn't say. Her work is volunteer so I hardly see that she has any 'skin in the game' whether Sandusky is free or not.

I agree she should have at least made public mention of the connection but maybe she isn't required to if it's a non-paying position? We need more info, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. The Second Mile, the charity Sandusky has been running since the 70's for
"at risk" children. Little did everyone know, the children were "at risk" from Sandusky!

The charity is in the HEART of the scandal, so it's not just some random good works she did on the side that he was affiliated with. The charity is where Sandusky trolled for victims and there is some pretty strong evidence that at least some board members knew about it.

Judges should avoid ANY perception of impropriety. This judge a) was a supporter (with her volunteer time) of a party to the scandal and b) gave Sandusky a ridiculously lenient deal on bail and monitoring. People are completely right to question her motives and judgment.

http://www.thesecondmile.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
47. If the board knew than likely the judge knew and didn't do anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
66. University Police have known since '98 -- and think someone from 2nd Mile ....
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 02:51 PM by defendandprotect
made a report to University? Was that it?

No charges were brought in '98, however -- hmmm....

Still don't understand why Mike McQueary hasn't been fired!

How in the hell do you come upon a sexual assault by Sandusky upon a child and

not intervene? Or at least try to ???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #66
76. It would look like retaliation for his being a witness and causing PSU problems. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. Mike McQueary reported the incident to his Dad and to ....
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 04:45 PM by defendandprotect
and administrator at the university -- wasn't it the president?

Why? His father should have told him to go to the police. And should have

asked him why he walked away without at least throwing a show at Sandusky.

In fact, the very law being discussed is in response to McQueary not reporting

to police -- and the whole bunch of them not reporting to police.

Rather, keeping McQueary on looks like he was trying to protect the university

rather than the child.

Any new law should include the responsibility to intervene -- at least to call

the police/911 -- or to go find a cop!


That doesn't mean that some may not agree with your suggestion that it could look

like "retaliation" -- but when this ends, he should be gone. Morally, he would not

be an example for young adults.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. I know--but now he is the ONLY eyewitness to the rape in the showers, and if PSU
were to fire him now, it would look too much like retaliation for them to get away with it. Also, the DA is not going to want his eyewitness canned, because they need his cooperation.

After it's all over, though, I sure do hope they push him out. I am quite sure the reason he did it the way he did was because it got him a cushy and secure position as an assistant coach in the line of succession at PSU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. Agree with your reasoning ---
and didn't know that he had been promoted! Wow!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. The article does indeed say. Right in the fifth paragraph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. The fifth paragraph?
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 11:47 AM by randome
It says this:

Judge Dutchcot's attorney profile with Goodall & Yurchak lists her volunteer work with the Second Mile charity.

That's all.

That being said, if the charity truly has some association with young kids (at the heart of the scandal), then, yeah, the judge should have recused herself.

On edit:
Okay, I could have Googled 'SEcond Mile' and found out for myself. Geeze, a little sleep deprived this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
29. Here's the problem, for those of you who don't know State College
Pretty much everyone who's anyone in State College has some connection to The Second Mile. It's not some small outfit run out of a storefront. It's quite likely the biggest private foundation in Centre County (outside of whatever PSU foundations may exist), its events are very well attended by the rich folks in town, it gets sponsorship and freebies from countless State College businesses, etc.

Trying to find an established lawyer/judge in State College who is not connected in some way (through donations, or volunteering, or other activity) to The Second Mile is probably damn nigh impossible.

The converse here is that a mere connection to The Second Mile is probably not as sinister as everyone here is making it out to be. The rib place Damon's used to donate full out dinners at Second Mile golf tournaments, but I wouldn't say that the ownership of Damon's was some kind of nefarious group associated with this "criminal organization," The Second Mile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. In which case that should have been made clear at the bail hearing
I don't have a transcript, of course, but I'd be surprised if the judge told everyone, and no reporter bothered writing it up (I've checked Google News, and there was no report mentioning it at the time). She should have said "we won't find a judge who doesn't have a connection to the charity at the heart of this case, so here's my involvement: ... : I'm the most neutral judge we can find".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. The legal question would be...
...was she required to say anything or to recuse herself? I'm guessing not since it's a volunteer position. I agree with alcibiades_mystery that it probably isn't as sinister as some make it sound.

But yeah, it would have put a lot of minds at ease if she had said SOMETHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. OR if she hadn't given Sandusky such a ridiculously sweet deal on
unsecured bail and no monitoring-- DRASTICALLY less than what the DA asked for. That's where SHE made the connection look fishy instead of just coincidental.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #37
79. even the appearance of a conflict should be addressed/dealt with
the idea isn't just to avoid conflicts but to avoid people thinking that there were or that they compromised justice.

of course those ships have all sailed by now. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. I don't disagree with that
It's also not clear what level of involvement she had as a volunteer that would even spur that approach. Maybe the lawyers in her firm handed out water cups during a Second Mile 5K race, right?

The notion that being listed as a volunteer for Second Mile automatically translates into the idea that she was mixed up with and covering for a group of pedophiles is just comical, if you knew the way Second Mile functions in State College.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. I think it's the unsecured bond and the no monitoring for an accused pedophile living
next to a school that moved her involvement with Second Mile from merely coincidental into the suspicious category.

If she had struck a compromise b/w what the DA wanted ($500K secured and ankle monitoring) and what the defense wanted(nothing), it would be one thing. But she released Sandusky w/out his having to pay a penny and with no way of knowing where he is while he's out on bail-- surely not the norm in cases where the charges are this serious/numerous and the accused will be living near children.

SHE is responsible for the fact that people are eyeing her with distrust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. No doubt
The release conditions are curious indeed.

Just adding some additional context for those unfamiliar with the region.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. Wondering what kind of bail-deal someone else, allegedly guilty of the same crimes, would have got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. I think that most folks would not have receieved any bail whatsoever. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. I will be very surprised if he shows up for his trial. (nt)
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 11:55 AM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. we'll know there's far more to the story if that happens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. I doubt very much if he will "be able" to show up for his trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. He will go off to the island with Ken Lay
He is not going to serve time in prison as a kiddie diddler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
34. WTF?
That's messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. Compromised judge? Remember, folks, it's OK when the rich and powerful Defendant is your friend.
Link from GD



Judge Leslie Dutchcot (Via Deadspin)



This judge should be removed from this case and punished for non-recusal, as this is a miscarriage of justice.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Agreed.
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
45. How many victims will we find came out while Corbett put the case on the back burner while he ran...
for governor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'm glad Corbett is concerned about whether PA law does enough to protect victims
of sexual abuse. It would have been nice if he had made this an issue during his six-year tenure as state attorney general, especially since a high-profile Philadelphia grand jury called for protections to be increased the year before he took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
51. The STINK of this just worsens. :-/ - K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. And we may be at just the tip of the iceberg...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
didact Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Oh...we ARE just at the tip of the iceberg*
nfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #53
67. More victims are expected to come forward -- over all these years, who knows how many?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
56. This thing is like a spaghetti monster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
57. power acts with arrogance and presumed immunity
no accountability-as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
61. A friend just went through some legal difficulty
for a very minor offense. She was laid off and is having a hard time.

A hot check...that was $15.00.

Got pulled over for a non-moving violation, was arrested for the outstanding warrant for a check for $15.00.

Had to pay a wrecker fee.

Had to pay the check. Had to pay court costs and NOW has to pay probation fees as well as mandatory classes that she has to take.

For a $15 hot check.


Laws are only for little people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
68. the corruption of the justice department from judges to police
is unbelievable

there is more to this than meets the eye

are we going to see a secret boys club here with occult leanings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #68
74. Isn't the judge a woman, though? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
72. Damn that Keith Olbermann to hell!
Newsman Keith Olbermann, among others, tweeted his outrage at the report: "Beyond belief: Judge who set unsecured bail for #PennState figure Sandusky is a volunteer for Sandusky's charity."

Outrage? That's not even POUTrage. That's a simple statement of fact. The liberal media strikes again...

:eyes:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
73. Frankly, I am surprised that Sandusky's pals don't realize that he could be in danger walking around
free, especially when the low unsecured bail has made angry people even angrier!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
75. In response to this story the Centre Law website got scrubbed
I can't read Dutchcot's biography on her law firm's website. I'm looking further into her background such as when she was appointed to the court by which governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #75
81. Earlier today, I spoke to a relative who happens to be a retired judge.
My relative thinks that some judges actually recuse themselves too much (to get out of having to rule on difficult/controversial cases) BUT that her volunteering was CLEARLY a case where recusal was appropriate and necessary. He was also ASTOUNDED at the unsecured bail and that Sandusky wasn't "ankled."

His opinion was that Dutchcot could be in real trouble over that bail and that the DA should be appealing it to a higher court. Wonder if he is... and, if not, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. That is an excellent question....
Is the DA appealing it to a higher court and if not, why not, indeed!

Thanks for the post, it was very interesting re the retired Judge's perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. Maybe the DA doesn't want to get disappeared like the DA did in 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #75
89. District Judges are elected. This one was elected in 2007:
DISTRICT JUDGE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 49-2-01
VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
LESLIE DUTCHCOT (DEM) . . . . . . 5,533 58.36
ROBERT W. STEWART (REP). . . . . . 3,940 41.56
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 8 .08
Over Votes . . . . . . . . . 0
Under Votes . . . . . . . . . 323

http://www.co.centre.pa.us/elections/results/results.asp?FolderName=2007_municipal_election&FileName=2007_municipal_accumulated_results

It's a six year term, so she will be up for reelection in 2013.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
87. This motherfucker couldn't recuse himself?
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 12:54 AM by fujiyama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Herself-- but yes, she could have and should have.
(see my post a few spaces above)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tawadi Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
90. So many horrible twists and turns to this story
All for the love of money/football.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
91. Sandusky and Paterno are BOTH Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC