Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keystone pipeline decision could be delayed until after election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 08:53 AM
Original message
Keystone pipeline decision could be delayed until after election
Source: LA Times

Reporting from Washington—
The Obama administration is considering a move that could delay a decision on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline by requiring sponsors to reduce the project's environmental risks before it can be approved, according to people with knowledge of the deliberations.

The step might put off a decision until after the 2012 election and be a way for the White House to at least temporarily avoid antagonizing either the unions that support the pipeline or the environmental activists who oppose it as President Obama gears up for his campaign.

-snip-

The State Department is now determining whether the project is in "the national interest," a process that entailed holding hearings recently along the proposed route. As a result, some issues have become more "salient," said a State Department official familiar with the process, "including the routing issue in Nebraska."

"The State Department is committed to conducting a thorough, rigorous and transparent process that leads to a decision that is in the national interest, including, if needed, gathering and assessing additional information," said the official, who was not authorized to comment publicly about the issue and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-keystone-pipeline-20111107,0,236919.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm.......
just like the jobs bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Thorugh, rigorous & transparent"? Political speak for "politically expedient"
It's not the unions supporting the pipeline which concern Obama. We've seen what he thinks of unions.

IT IS BIG OIL AND THEIR CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS.

The word has gone out to the State Department to stall and delay until after the 2012 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am sure Obama would like that to be the case...
..i just don't see the pipeline company waiting around for another 12+ months for the decision...iirc they have already been threatening people along the suggested route with eminent domain snatches if they don't leave, so things appear to be too far down the road for a 12-month delay just to give the prevaricator-in-chief in the Oval Office some political cover...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do the unions really think they will be given the jobs.
My guess is that less than 5% of the jobs will be union workers. The number of jobs that will be created by the pipeline will be temporary and not enough to help the country as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. The amount of jobs created by the waste line will be less than those cost by raising gas prices it
will induce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Man, he's getting to the point of being pathetic
remember Jed Bartlet hiding in the WH to avoid weighing in on the death penalty case? Which way to you think the president will decide once he doesn't have to politick the issue? Think Sierra's going to be fooled by this dodge?

So discouraging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyohiolib Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. "reduce the project's environmental risks" blah blah blah
they've known about these risks all along and only "cares" now that it's close to election time. it's captain politics to the rescue again. fail b.o. fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olleander Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Charlie Browm
Hey, Charlie Brown.  I'll let you kick the football after the
election.  Really.  The Wall Street banker who is the
President's chief of staff must really think that Charlie
Brown is gullible.  Oh, that's right.  We are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. What?!?!?
Reducing environmental impacts and analyzing other routes are mandatory under NEPA, yet is the White House seriously trying to make it like they're doing these things as a response to protests? Also, these things were in the timeline from the beginning!

The chicanery here is galling! :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. If they delay it
that means they will approve it after the election so there will be not "political" consequence.

Yeah, you could also see this as a plan to deny the plan after the election for the same reasons, but the administration's track record of kissing up to Wall Street makes that unlikely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why can't he kill this environmental disaster now? Because the Koch brothers son't let him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-11 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Can't go upsetting the paymasters can he?
Especially when he's saving up for the next election ...


:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC