Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Requests A Joint Session Of Congress For Major Jobs Speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:02 PM
Original message
Obama Requests A Joint Session Of Congress For Major Jobs Speech
Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Upping the stakes of his push for a major jobs plan, President Barack Obama has requested House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to call a joint session of Congress that would take place on September 7, 2011.

The letter, sent from the White House to the respective leaders, reads as follows:

Dear Mr. Speaker: Dear Mr. Leader:,

Our Nation faces unprecedented economic challenges, and millions of hardworking Americans continue to look for jobs. As I have traveled across our country this summer and spoken with our fellow Americans, I have heard a consistent message: Washington needs to put aside politics and start making decisions based on what is best for our country and not what is best for each of our parties in order to grow the economy and create jobs. We must answer this call.

Therefore, I respectfully request the opportunity to address a Joint Session of Congress on September 7, 2011, at 8:00 p.m. It is my intention to lay out a series of bipartisan proposals that the Congress can take immediately to continue to rebuild the American economy by strengthening small businesses, helping Americans get back to work, and putting more money in the paychecks of the Middle Class and working Americans, while still reducing our deficit and getting our fiscal house in order. It is our responsibility to find bipartisan solutions to help grow our economy, and if we are willing to put country before party, I am confident we can do just that.


A request for comment from Speaker Boehner's office as to whether he will formally invite the president to address Congress was not immediately returned.

If the president's request is granted, the joint session would provide him with the type of audience that usually accompanies a State of the Union address. It would also add additional weight to an already critical push by the administration to shift political discussions to job creation.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/31/obama-joint-session-jobs_n_943471.html



Good. Use that bully pulpit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Same day as the Republican debate the fat ass drugster is throwing another hissy fit.
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 12:13 PM by gordianot
He is calling on Boner to say "NO". Another little drama to watch. Poor little Perry will have his public introduction delayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Has a president ever been denied a request to speak?
I think it would be shocking, but I would not be surprised if the Republicans were to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is what I was wondering too
do you think they have the audacity to do so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. House historian says public move by Boehner to tell Obama to change date is unprecedented.

@LukeRussert Luke Russert
House historian says public move by Boehner to tell #Obama to change date is unprecedented. Negotiations usually happen behind closed doors

http://twitter.com/#!/LukeRussert/status/109008908319850497

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. And for good reason.
Article II, section 3 of the Constitution gives the president the authority to give the State of the Union message but also states

"he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either ot them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper"

It seems to me that the Constitution supports the authority of the President to convenes a session of Congress as needed.

This is not just a matter of dismissing or calling Congress back from a holiday. The Constitution specifically uses the words "on extraordinary Occasions." That gives the President a lot of leeway on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. I wonder if the president has the authority to specify the exact hour at which the session should
start. Of if the president invokes Article II, section 3 could Boehner say "alright the House will convene at 3 AM and you can give your speech then."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. It pretty much gives the president the authority to convene
the Congress when he chooses.

It says

"he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses."

The Congress and the speaker can otherwise regulate themselves, but this just happens to be a power granted to the President as I read it.

How else could you interpret this.

Beyond that, the Constitution in the 20th Amendment requires Congress to meet once a year. Convening the Congress does not appear to be a power particularly granted to the Speaker.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. "Smirk." - RepubliCons Against America (R - Negatory)
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 12:30 PM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
46. I do not believe so
Bill Clinton was invited to speak for his 1999 state of the union right smack in the middle of his Senate impeachment trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. The president is not "invited" to speak. The Constitution, at Article II, section 3
authorizes the president to convene Congress and speak to them when he wants to. Read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. It says nothing abotut the president speaking to Congress in person
The State of the Union was a written message from Thomas Jefferson until Woodrow Wilson.

Herbert Hoover went back to a written message, and then FDR resumed the in person speech.

Section 3 - State of the Union, Convening Congress

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.


Yes, he can call them into special session anytime he likes, but this says nothing about him delivering an in person speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. He has tradtitionally given speeches in Congress.
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 10:32 PM by JDPriestly
There is nothing wrong with it. If he has the authority to convene both Houses, then he may do so any time for any reason. The Constitution says nothing that would prevent him from convening both Houses for whatever purpose. It does not limit this authority except to say that it should be used on certain occasions.

He has the authority to do this and is in his rights. Boehner and Limbaugh should apologize. They are utterly wrong.

On edit, here is what it says about the convening of Congress other than by the President:

20th Amendment

Section 2. The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year, and such meeting shall begin at noon on the 3d day of January, unless they shall by law appoint a different day.

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#A1Sec8

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. hope he doesn't give a half-assed milquetoast kum-bah-yah speech
which the right wing will lambaste as hard-core socialism. we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Ditto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. IMHO
What he needs to do is come big or stay at home..... His best and maybe only real shot at reelection is to push hard for job creation bills, more stimulus, push for infrastructure work, and let the rethugs turn it all down and then push for more and more. Continually forcing them into a position of hurting the mainstream voting public by denying jobs is his best shot... He may still be able to pull it off without doing this but it would be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can't help but wonder what he'll give away before the bargaining even begins...
...in the name of being "bipartisan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ditto also...
Call me suspicious but it's from being burned time and time again...by him AND over the years by so many pols.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. Really but what's left to give away, and why does he never learn?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. It better be a REALLY good plan!
...get to the points Prez O...keep the blah, blah, blah out as well as the phony smoke-and-mirrors "tax credits/cuts" for hiring and give America something concrete to work with...no pun intended.

I simply don't know how we can get LOTS of jobs back here, with all those "free trade" deals. If they think that being a burger flipper, shelf stocker at Waldomart, or some other minimum wager, part-time, temp position is a job. It is NOT.

We need jobs that provide a livable wage. We need manufacturing jobs and production jobs. We need smart and educated persons to work in this country.

But with cuts in education, elimination of manufacturing of "stuff" right here...were sunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. I LOVE IT!!!!
if only because it's EXACTLY what the Rethugs would do!!!!

:bounce:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not sure I understand.
"It is my intention to lay out a series of bipartisan proposals that the Congress can take immediately"

Does he mean bipartisan proposals for steps (or measures) that Congress can take immediately?


What makes the things he plans to suggest to Congress "bipartisan?"

We'll soon see, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dear Mr. President
Apparently you haven't noticed that the GOP has not, and will not, EVER do ANYTHING you ask, even when it was originally THEIR idea. Why you have problems learning this lesson is a mystery, you seem like such a bright man.

Skip congress, address the nation, showcase that to get tax cuts for their corporate buddies, the GOP will turn its back on hurricane victims.

Point out the hypocrisy, quit enabling the hypocrisy, and LEAD!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
55. TV is not obligated to broadcast every speech he makes, but they will surely carry
any speeches he gives to a joint session because they are so rare.

Besides, he is impressing the American public with the importance of this, so they will tune in and listen up.

I think this is a good strategy, provided he gives a great speech; and that is his forte.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #55
61. Anytime a president has announced
he is making a "special address" to the nation, ALL networks have carried it.

The PUBLIC is who he needs to motivate. The PUBLIC is who needs to be educated about the GOP hypocrisy and loyalty to to the uber-rich. He can't say that in a joint session, since at best he will be jeered by the GOP, at worst some armed psycho in the Tea Party caucus will pull out a gun and try to assassinate him.

There is nothing to be gained from addressing Congress. His speech will be about the need to come together an be bi-partisan, which means, caving to 98% of GOP demands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. If their smoking joints ...
it would be worthwhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. Why are their joints smoking? Have they been running
a long way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. more of the same old bullshit
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 01:01 PM by placton
"Therefore, I respectfully request the opportunity to address a Joint Session of Congress on September 7, 2011, at 8:00 p.m. It is my intention to lay out a series of bipartisan proposals that the Congress can take immediately to continue to rebuild the American economy by strengthening small businesses, helping Americans get back to work, and putting more money in the paychecks of the Middle Class and working Americans, while still reducing our deficit and getting our fiscal house in order. It is our responsibility to find bipartisan solutions to help grow our economy, and if we are willing to put country before party, I am confident we can do just that."


same proposals, same crappy ideas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. what are the odds the boner won`t comply......
if he does how many republicans won`t show up......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. Why wouldn't he allow Obama to give a good Republican speech? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
placton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Obama Requests A Joint Session Of Congress For Major Jobs Speech
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 01:00 PM by placton
Source: Huffington

Upping the stakes of his push for a major jobs plan, President Barack Obama has requested House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to call a joint session of Congress that would take place on September 7, 2011.

"Therefore, I respectfully request the opportunity to address a Joint Session of Congress on September 7, 2011, at 8:00 p.m. It is my intention to lay out a series of bipartisan proposals that the Congress can take immediately to continue to rebuild the American economy by strengthening small businesses, helping Americans get back to work, and putting more money in the paychecks of the Middle Class and working Americans, while still reducing our deficit and getting our fiscal house in order. It is our responsibility to find bipartisan solutions to help grow our economy, and if we are willing to put country before party, I am confident we can do just that.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/31/obama-joint-session-jobs_n_943471.html



NOT a major jobs speech at all, it seems. Just a rehash of his anti-SocSec (more freeze on the tax supporting same), patent bullshit (straight from the GOP plan), and on and on. I just cannot stomach this anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Why are you judging the speech before it is given?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Unrec...
Debbie Downerism gone haywire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I hope RW Congress requests equal air time to respond why we don't need jobs
Should be entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cool Logic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. You are overlooking the PR benefits that such a speech would offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. "bipartisan proposals", "reducing our deficit", WTF?
Is ANYBODY still buying this crap?

As much as this fucking speech is being hyped it had better be more than another effort at his goddamn bipartisanship.

But I'm not optimistic at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNinWB Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. How sad for you! ("I just cannot stomach this anymore.")
I plan to watch and think the "Joint Session" jobs" speech is a great idea.

The entire country can watch the R Teatards---arms folded, faces scowling, seething Obama hatred. They will make no effort to hid this. Pass the popcorn.

Any jobs' proposals Obama makes must make it through the Tea Party House, which loathes him with a white hot fury. Now, we can watch them in full color!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. kumbayah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Unrec.
Your concern is noted and filed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. I agree WITH you...
so many replies to your post BUT...I think everyone needs to re-read that second paragraph:

"Therefore, I respectfully request the opportunity to address a Joint Session of Congress on September 7, 2011, at 8:00 p.m. It is my intention to lay out a series of bipartisan proposals that the Congress can take immediately to continue to rebuild the American economy by strengthening small businesses, helping Americans get back to work, and putting more money in the paychecks of the Middle Class and working Americans, while still reducing our deficit and getting our fiscal house in order. It is our responsibility to find bipartisan solutions to help grow our economy, and if we are willing to put country before party, I am confident we can do just that."

...lay out a series of bipartisan proposals.
We usually know how that is gonna go over with the GOPBaggers.

...take IMMEDIATELY to continue to rebuild the American economy.
Uh huh...immediately? The Thugs will just say no...ya, their problem but it doesn't help Americans.

...putting more money in the paychecks of the Middle Class and working Americans.
Well, those of us that are working...anything helps but the bigger picture is jobs that pay a LIVABLE wage.

...while still reducing our deficit.
Pentagon? Military budget? The Congressional budget? Perks and breaks for mega-corps? Cut some of that
shit...I'll believe it when I actually see it. And do something about this:

"REPORT: 25 Corporations Paid More To Their CEO Last Year Than They Paid In Taxes"
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/08/31/308487/25-corporations-paid-more-to-ceo-taxes/

SO...IF the speech is serious and he and the Dems have some balls to stick it to the Thugs...I'll be happy. Until then
I've been disappointed over and over and over and over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
36. -1000
Why not wait, my DU friend and see what he says, then comment? This is really tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bipartisan = ineffective, unworkable, designed only to make the rich richer
and the poor poorer.

Obama has once again lost before he even got started.

Good heavens, doesn't this man ever, ever learn?

How did he ever get through Columbia and Harvard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. It'll be interesting to see what Obama can propose given
the constraints that he's agreed to - zero tax increases, tremendous spending cuts, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watajob Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. Oh, goody!
Another moving prime time oratory that accomplishes nothing. Shows over. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
november3rd Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
30. Other plans
Ah, shoot! I'm afraid I have other plans that evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. ...and they will call him a liar and he will just smile...
:evilfrown: ...This had better be good....and it had better be big...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. Awesome! Let the GOP debate whether the earth is flat.
While the GOP tries to keep the focus on budget cuts, scheduling on Wednesday will show the contrast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Except that Boehner...
Edited on Wed Aug-31-11 03:54 PM by YvonneCa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. It's a request. Obama can just go forward with the speech.
Plus NBC and Politico, the sponsors of the debate like the contrast. Imagine the split screens. Better ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I hope you are right. He should do exactly...
...that. If he can't do it in the House chamber...then use the Capitol gallery or the Senate chamber (smaller, I know...so maybe he can't invite the whole House membership. :7 )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. It's a request. Obama can just go forward with the speech.
Plus NBC and Politico, the sponsors of the debate like the contrast. Imagine the split screens. Better ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Obama can give a speech anytime he wants to, but if he wants to give it before a joint session
it has to be done while Congress is in session, and he doesn't not have the power to force Congress into session. Only the congressional leadership can so that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Article 2, Section 3, Clause 2:
Calling Congress into extraordinary session; adjourning Congress

The President may call extraordinary sessions of one or both Houses of Congress. If the two Houses cannot agree on a date for adjournment, the President may adjourn both Houses to such a time as he or she thinks fit. The last time this power was exercised was in 1948, when President Harry S. Truman called a special session of Congress. That was the twenty-seventh time in American history when a president convened such a session.

I'm not saying he should, just pointing out that technically he certainly can force Congress into session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Thanks for the correction. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Not that I'm an authority on the Constitution...
...far from it! I just recalled someone telling me that so I went and looked it up. Of course there is no way Obama would do it in this case, nor should he, so it's of purely academic interest in this discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Boehner wants to move the speech to Thursday so that it will be up against
the kick-off of the NFL season. If that happens I'm afraid Obama would lose the ratings battle to football. And I'm not sure what Obama can do about it since he cannot force the House to be in session. The House leadership has that power, not the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. Constitutionally, he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. Yes, you are correct. I stand corrected on that.
But I guess it's a moot point now that he has agreed to postpone it until Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. Yes. Obama can convene a session of Congress under the
Constitution, Article II, Section 3. Members can choose to show up or not.

What kind of debate is conflicting with this date?

The 7th is the best date for the President's speech considering the state of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #37
53. Thursday night is the NFL's football season kick-off. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Which is why Wednesday is...
...better. JMHO. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC