Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama wants Cameron to back Palestinian state with pre-1967 borders

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:27 PM
Original message
Obama wants Cameron to back Palestinian state with pre-1967 borders
Source: The Guardian

Barack Obama will seek a joint Middle East agreement with David Cameron, insisting that a Palestinian state should be based on pre-1967 borders – a proposal rejected by Israel's prime minister as "unrealistic" and "indefensible".

The issue will be raised in private talks between the two men during the state visit by Obama and his wife to London, only the third by a US president in 100 years. Afghanistan, Libya, relations with Pakistan and the global economy – as well as the vacancy for the top job at the IMF – will also make up the agenda.

Despite the outright rejection by the Israeli premier, Binyamin Netanyahu, of a Palestinian state based on the borders that existed before the Six Day War, when Israel captured and occupied the West Bank and Gaza, Obama has already secured the political backing of the United Nations, European Union and Russia who, with America, are collectively known as the "quartet".

Signalling his determination to keep up pressure on Israel, Obama will be looking to enlist the public support of the UK prime minister. The aim is, in large part, to persuade the Palestinian leadership not to go to the UN in September seeking symbolic backing for an independent state.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/21/obama-cameron-pre-1967-palestinian-borders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good News n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I suspect they already have an agreement otherwise this would not have come out..
The pressure is mounting on Bibi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe the Rapture Guy just missed the date by a few days..
Bibi and the entire right are not wrapped too tight.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great article
The coming meeting between the two men follows evidence of a hardening of criticism of Israel by London. On the eve of the Obamas' arrival, Middle East minister Alistair Burt accused Israel of "unhelpful and destabilising activity" in announcing the building of 1,500 new settlement units in East Jerusalem ahead of a speech by the president on the Middle East on Friday.

"I am deeply disappointed with Israel's announcement on 19 May to build up to 1,500 settlement units in the East Jerusalem settlements of Har Homa and Pisgat Ze'ev," Burt said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lilyin Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think he will
It's been in the works a while and there is no other solution that will work for BOTH sides, in my view. Israel will isolate itself if it does not agree to what President Obama suggested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corruption Winz Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good stuff...
So, this is how you deal with foreign matters? You get your stuff together, get the proper backing and then talk things out. Fascinating. I thought you just ran in there and played it by ear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Does this indicate that Obama will back it in Sept?
Holy shit if so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. I often disagree with Obama, but I am with him on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, the real reason is to undermine the Palestinians?
That's sort of how it seems. Other countries have already recognized an independent Palestinian state, and if this move is just to suggest that "negotiations" should continue and sink a UN resolution, it is a move away from peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hm, I wonder if the US has a way to keep up the pressure on Israel?
It's not like American taxpayers finance their military and economy to the tune of $3 billion a year average, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. WRONG Obama mentions 1967 borders as a STARTING POINT for talks like all modern presidents have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AndiMer Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. Recommend
Makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. And so he should
Is that a fact ? Only the third visit by a US President in 100 years ?

Not so sure about this bit : the Palestinian leadership not to go to the UN in September seeking symbolic backing for an independent state. Israel is state so why not Palestine. Is this because of the "sovereign state" issues ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. If it works with Israel and Palestine, that will be good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. My President!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC