Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Geithner: Republicans responsible if US defaults

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 12:54 PM
Original message
Geithner: Republicans responsible if US defaults
Source: Associated Press

updated 5/18/2011 9:09:24 AM ET 2011-05-18T13:09:24

NEW YORK — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Tuesday that if Republicans insist on passage of their budget plan as a condition for approving an increase in the nation's borrowing limit, they will be responsible for the consequences.

Speaking to a New York audience, Geithner said that Republicans would bear responsibility for the first debt default in the nation's history if they insist they will not vote for an increase in the $14.3 billion borrowing limit unless they win approval of a House Republican budget plan.

"If Republicans try to impose that plan on this country as a condition for raising the debt limit, then they will own the responsibility for the first default in our history, with devastating consequences," Geithner said in a speech to the Harvard Club of New York.

Geithner noted that the country reached the current borrowing limit of $14.29 trillion on Monday. He said he has begun deploying a series of bookkeeping maneuvers to avoid a debt default but that he will run out of maneuvering room around Aug. 2.

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43075566/ns/politics-capitol_hill/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. All the more reason for them to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErikJ Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. 20 years of GOP President deficits since 1980.
and 9 of those were record deficits and they raised the debt limit every time. Hypocritical frauds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
on point Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Enough of being polite to right wing crazies. Tell it like it is!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They don't care, well
especially the ones with no money. The ones with money do care and are advising their trolls to threaten but don't take it too far b/c they like the Koch Brothers, Wall Street, and US Chamber will lose a whole a lot money. Also gold will go down. At this point in time they must kept the dollar strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Please. Geithner is at fault too.
Not to disagree fully with Geithner, as Republicans should shoulder most of the blame if the debt limit deadline has passed, but little Timmy should take some of the blame too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Sorry, but no, this is the GOP's screwup, the old blame both sides thing won't work this time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarburstClock Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Sorry but yes!
The old call the poster wrong thing won't work this time. The financial system is a propped up failure being led by a democratic administration at the moment. Criminal banks were "too big to fail" and given 100s of billions by guess who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AC_Mem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:53 PM
Original message
Sorry but NO
"Criminal banks were "too big to fail" and given 100s of billions by guess who?"

Um, BUSH?

Bush enacted TARP and signed off on the bailout.

President Bush- not President Obama- enacted TARP and signed the Bank bailout into law towards the end of his presidency. And yet a large percentage of Americans believe that Obama is responsible. -snip-

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robbie-gennet/bush--not-obama--enacted_b_678682.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
65. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #32
62. Who? G.W. Bush. That's who.
:eyes:


Chimp signed TARP into law in October 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. Right, because the administration didn't support extending the Bush tax cuts..
and throwing trillions at the banks, and extending the wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
57. No, it won't. The 'they are all the same' mantra is just surrendering to conservative memes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I'm with you...Summers, Rubin and Geithner all bear responsibility.
As regulators and overseers they *ucked up.
Then they arranged to bail out the abusers.

AIG anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No this is totally the Republicans. If they refuse to raise the debt ceilling we are FUCKED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. We're already fucked.
Did you sleep through it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. I know that. But we are going to be fucked beyond that. More fucked than we can imagine,
All because the Republicans are grandstanding for their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. And if they do, we're fucked
There is a limit to how long we can just kick the can down the road.

Neither side wants to do anything because it's likely that the voting public is going to be pissed off no matter what party is in control so everyone plays musical chairs and prays the other side is left standing when the bottom falls out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
48. Wrong
Why raise the debt ceiling? If we keep doing that, than we are TRULY FUCKED!!!! I think the US needs a good slap on the nose with a credit rating drop below AAA. It's time to get our house in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. Two different things... yes they are guilty in the runup and bailout...
but refusing to raise the debt ceiling is an act of terrorism when they know that there will be another financial meltdown if there is a so-called "default."

Plus the fact that the Republicans ran up the debt with the intention of doing exactly what they are doing--terrorizing Americans into giving up the New Deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Why? No one has ever held the debt limit hostage before.
What the Rethugs are doing now would have been considered unconscionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
45. Obama voted against raising the debt limit in 2006. here are his exact words on this issue back then
"Over the past 5 years, our federal debt has increased by $3.5 trillion to $8.6 trillion.That is “trillion” with a “T.” That is money that we have borrowed from the Social Security trust fund, borrowed from China and Japan, borrowed from American taxpayers. And over the next 5 years, between now and 2011, the President’s budget will increase the debt by almost another $3.5 trillion.

Numbers that large are sometimes hard to understand. Some people may wonder why they matter. Here is why: This year, the Federal Government will spend $220 billion on interest. That is more money to pay interest on our national debt than we’ll spend on Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. That is more money to pay interest on our debt this year than we will spend on education, homeland security, transportation, and veterans benefits combined. It is more money in one year than we are likely to spend to rebuild the devastated gulf coast in a way that honors the best of America.

And the cost of our debt is one of the fastest growing expenses in the Federal budget. This rising debt is a hidden domestic enemy, robbing our cities and States of critical investments in infrastructure like bridges, ports, and levees; robbing our families and our children of critical investments in education and health care reform; robbing our seniors of the retirement and health security they have counted on.

Every dollar we pay in interest is a dollar that is not going to investment in America’s priorities.

Senator Barack Obama
Senate Floor Speech on Public Debt
March 16, 2006"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. That was then, this is now.
Deficits mattered then, but not now. Don't you get it?! Obama needs this $1.5T deficit. He wants it to bail out Wall Street indefinitely, to end social security payroll tax, killing social security, for insurance companies, and for more wars, the MIC must never be cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #54
68. That's the price you pay for change you can believe in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
55. Not for this. The republicans are effectively holding the country hostage, and if the debt limit is
not increased, the republicans will be FULLY responsible

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #55
61. Who's fault is it for the debt being so high in the first place?
Trust me, I am not completely absolving GOP of the blame, but Tim needs to take some blame for this too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. I know you are not, but the debt started to get out of control with reagan. I remember them saying
that the countries debt does matter, and no one questioning that

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
70. So, You Endorse Ending Medicare To Reach A Deal?
Disagree, this is on the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. OMG...What will Fox News say????
I despise Geithner,
but give him an Attaboy! for correctly & publicly assigning the responsibility to The Republicans.

The sad news is that this is so uncommon from the post-partisan "Democratic" Party
that it evokes cheers.
It should NOT be noteworthy.


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will stand up for working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone



"By their works you will know them."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Ditto what you stated very succinctly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Yeah, our post partisan president want Dems to make nice
with the Repugs and let them have their way. When will the man even show even one drop of compassion for working and poor folks, the only spine I've seen from him was with Osama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. It will conveniently be ignored
just like most of the media will ignore Geithner's statement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
59. OMG
But you know of course that many here will happily assist the GOP with the "it's Obamas fault" not that O should not have grown a spine eariler, but some here think that a GOP winning 2012 is the key to that hoped for collapse that will somehow put them on top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. "many here will happily assist the GOP" ?
If you mean those cheering for Post-Partisan Centrist Compromise on issues and values that used to be Democratic Party Life Blood,
then you may have a point.


Most of those making noise, like myself, LOVE the Democratic party,
have worked FOR and voted FOR "Democrats" for decades,
and don't want to see Party of FDR/LBJ turned into a 1/2 Republican Chamber of Commerce APPROVED abomination.
We are carrying the message of Harry Truman:
"I've seen it happen time after time. When the Democratic candidate allows himself to be put on the defensive and starts apologizing for the New Deal and the fair Deal, and says he really doesn't believe in them, he is sure to lose. The people don't want a phony Democrat. If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign."-- Democratic President Harry Truman


QED: 2010



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republicons and their so-called 'conservative' economics screwed America's pooch
Any unbiased observer is well aware of Republicon economic FAIL & pass blame baloney...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well no shit
It's appalling, seeing how this turd in a punchbowl needs pointing out to the mindless horde.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder if Mr. Geitner's frankness could rub off on Mr. Obama? It would be wonderful, but guess I
better not hold my breath.

recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well yeah Timmy. IF it happens it would be the
Republican's fault, but it ain't gonna happen. This is just a big bluff. Wall Street wants the debt limit raised, so it WILL be raised. This is just a way to bluster and see how much they can get of their "austerity" passed.

Ready to go GREEK on their ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. You are right it won't happen it can't. They want to strip the government of money but this is ....
no really possible. RW radio is attacking Boner for saying at the outset the obvious - this can't happen. Once again the RW leads the followers around by the nose on contrived BS only to not do it at the end (because they never meant to). They, as you state, are bluffing. Please please please Dems don't use that as cover for doing what we all know will be a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Mr. Geitner finally is saying what apparently no-one else in D.C. has the temerity to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corruption Winz Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. So... it's news that the government is making people take accountability?
Fascinating. I can't wait to they make it known whether or not people that commit crimes need to be put in prison and if people that lie should tell the truth.

Fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. The republicans have worked hard and long to bring this nation to its knees
Why would they stop now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Dems sure don't stop them, they collude with the practice
of giving all the nations' money to the most rich and fucking everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. That is what really pisses you off, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. He's right. The repigs are playing economic chicken.
This would be great if only people actually listened to/respected Geitner. He's the low man on the totem pole in terms of people I respect in this administration right in front of Duncan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. It really will be their fault
But they don't really give a shit about America's best interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avant Guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. OK, then draw a line in the sand
Tell them you will NOT negotiate with blackmailers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. The public needs to listen to this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
30. While he is correct in saying that, the blame will mostly fall on Obama
If the economy crashes and sends us into a Depression, the blame will mostly go to Obama. Presidents get the lion's share of the blame if the economy is bad, just like they get the majority of the credit if the economy is good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. True it was a Democratic President that said...
The Buck Stops Here.... So Obama will get the blame... no matter what Timmy boy wants to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. Well I work with a bunch of Teahadists
They are now bringing out quotes like this....

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over lousy fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship."

They claim it is the Democrats using crisis to create entitlments i.e., Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, Welfare, WIC, extended Unemployment compensation, Stimulus, and now Healthcare, have created a government controlled nanny state that is unsustainable.

They claim that every time Obama says tax the rich it is exactly his desire to take money from the public trust in support of programs to benefit the majority and will eventually result in the collapse of the economy. They claim we are in the dependency cycle now and after the collapse we will be ruled by Dictatorship.

I try to defend by saying well most of the defecit is due to Bush unpaid for wars, tax increases for the rich and the TARP bailout....

I get hammered with, if the above social programs are so important to Democrats then why didn't Obama abandon the failed wars, and stop the Bush tax cuts so he could use that revenue to shore up the social programs? They also claim that TARP has been paid back by most of the banks only the auto industry that Obama bailed out hasn't paid their money back so they claim that the TARP portion is Obama's defecit.

I default to the overblown Pentagon budget and surprisingly I find many that agree with me that defense spending should be cut but that doesn't stop them from their desire to end all of the social safety net programs....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Sooo, basically they're saying that they hate our
freedoms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. You can hit them with this graph on who has increased the debt...


Also, the TARP money was paid back on Obama's watch (wasn't it Elizabeth Warren who was overseeing that?) - I believe the initial trillions in bailouts before TARP (doled out by Bush and Paulson) has not been paid back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Also, hit them with the Reagan quote demanding an increase in the debt ceiling
Edited on Wed May-18-11 07:21 PM by NewJeffCT

Denigration of the full faith and credit of the United States would have substantial effects on the domestic financial markets and on the value of the dollar in exchange markets. The nation can ill afford to allow such a result. The risks, the costs, the disruptions, and the incalculable damage lead me to but one conclusion: the Senate must pass this legislation before the Congress adjourns.


http://thinkprogress.org/2011/05/16/reagan-debt-flashback/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. this appears on MSNBC.com Wonder if they will report it on network news? Yeah, RIGHT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodyM90 Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
43. Don’t worry, the limit will be raised.
It has been said if a child wanted a puppy, he should ask for a pony. When the republicans ask for a pony, Obama will give them a Mustang convertible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodyM90 Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
44. Don’t worry, the limit will be raised.
It has been said if a child wanted a puppy, he should ask for a pony. When the republicans ask for a pony, Obama will give them a Mustang convertible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
46. "...Republicans would bear responsibility for the first debt default in the nation's history..."
....atta-boy, timmy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
47. FUCK GEITHNER
I don't need this fear mongering. Cut spending. I can't believe I may actually agree with Repugs for once in my life. Simple math- If you take in X and spend X+Y the result is not good. Cut all, and I mean ALL, expenditures across the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. "Cut all, and I mean ALL, expenditures across the board."
Tax all the rich, and I mean ALL the rich, fairly across the board.

....I might agree with you if I believed the cooked numbers and narratives, but I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Amen
Let's tax all income above $50,000 at 100%. Add that to a cut in expenditures and we may get it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. exactly, but make it military expenditures; now you're making sense....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. I said all expenditures. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #47
71. So, You Endorse The Republican Call To End Medicare?
I blame the Republicans for this current upcoming crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
50. well duh...but it`s not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. I suspect you are correct. The republicans are playing to their insane base, but in the end they
Edited on Wed May-18-11 10:14 PM by still_one
will increase the debt limit

If they don't it will be most interesting, and I don't mean in a good way, and even more suffering will be caused by it


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
58. Offer to cut the money the GOP demands
only take it out of the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
60. That is what pukes want, for the US to fail...
and for the Government to faulter. As long as they can do that, I do not think they give a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
64. Do you seriously think people who can't pay their bills will think that hard?
Edited on Thu May-19-11 10:41 AM by jtuck004
They will get rid of whoever is in the way in some blind hope that the next one will be the magic pill. It's the United States, Timmy.

Go play with your banker friends.

Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaynardGeeKrebs Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
66. All according to plan
I'm afraid we're about to see a long term plan be fulfilled. I can clearly remember the Jr. Bushie describing his plan for radical tax cuts to a reporter in the run up to the primaries before his first electoral theft. The reporter asked him what he would do if the cuts failed to generate growth and a financial crisis ensued in the form of debt. His reply, as best as I can recall, was something like: Weellll (snicker) thaaan (snicker snort) weud just have to (smirk snicker snort) cut entitlements and (heh heh heh) so cee al programs (heh heh smirk snicker snort smirk heh heh).

When I heard this, a light bulb immediately went off and I thought to myself "that IS their plan".

They've squeezed the middle class and poor for every cent they're worth while filing the pockets of the ultra rich, now they're ready to go in for the final kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
69. K & R! Thanks for calling like it is!
With McConnell, Ryan and Coburn demanding the end to Medicare, and holding the economy hostage, we need to tell it like it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC