Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rise In FBI Use Of National Security Letters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 06:17 PM
Original message
Rise In FBI Use Of National Security Letters
Source: ASSOCIATED PRESS

(05-09) 15:22 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --

The number of people the FBI targeted with national security letters more than doubled last year to more than 14,000.

The letters enable the bureau to collect virtually unlimited kinds of sensitive, private information like financial and phone records in terrorism and espionage investigations. In 2007, the Justice Department's inspector general found widespread violations in the FBI's use of the letters, including demands without proper authorization and information obtained in non-emergency circumstances. The FBI has tightened oversight of the system.

The letters are controversial because there is no court scrutiny of the process; the letters are simply signed by FBI officials without review by a judge.

In a summary to Congress, the Justice Department said the FBI made 24,287 national security letter requests last year for information regarding 14,212 people. That's up from 2009 when there were 14,788 requests for information about 6,114 people.

MORE...

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/05/09/national/w142713D59.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Completely breaks checks and balances.
It moves all authority to executive branch to further attempts at totalitarianism, and consolidations.


Although it will break down, as many use the powers for wrong reasons against innocent people, and pull down those concepts by those actions.


And I am due beer and travel money and many experiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. And Obama said he would stop their use when he was running for president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, he said many things... most of them lies, apparently
wheeee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. When?
Citation please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 2007?
"In 2007, candidate Obama said during his Presidency there would be "no more National Security Letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime" because "that is not who we are, and it is not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists." The hope that he'll make good on that statement is seeming pretty audacious."

http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-national/patriot-act-up-for-renewal-and-no-one-notices

14 Governors were served with them under Obama. I'm guessing they weren't charged with a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime"
Heck of a caveat, there.... thanks for finding the reference. (Suspected != charged, only references citizens, not resident aliens, rationalizes the use of NSL for "a crime", not just federal terrorism crimes, etc.).

I find a great number of these "broken promises" have similar annoying nuances/loopholes/word games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marasinghe Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. hoover would be so happy, he'd be dancing with the stars in his little blue dress. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC