Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel: FBI Weak on Terror Threat Response

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 09:39 AM
Original message
Panel: FBI Weak on Terror Threat Response
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Sept-11-Commission.html

anel: FBI Weak on Terror Threat Response
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: April 13, 2004


Filed at 10:13 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The FBI failed miserably over several years to reorganize and respond to a steadily growing threat of terrorism, and Attorney General John Ashcroft rejected an appeal from the agency for more funding on the day before al-Qaida struck, the commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks said Tuesday.


..more at AP

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. the day before
wouldn't have helped. :( But it proves Asscroft hadn't a clue to threat that AQ posed to the US. Hope they rake him over the coals today and show him for the insuffering incompentent that he is as AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. This also in on the subject...
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/13/911.commission/index.html">Former FBI Director Louis Freeh today told the panel investigating the 9/11 attacks that because the United States had not declared war against Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annak110 Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why do you suppose they aren't
asking the questions surrounding the event itself? If they put "hijacked planes flying toward New York for over an hour" and "the world trade center has been attacked before" together with the memos that might start them on a productive line of questioning. They could also find out how a plane that supposedly crashed could possibly have spread debris eight miles on crashing.

After all, they're never going to find "intelligence" in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Remember Refusal of Search Warrant of Terrorist Before 9-11
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0205/29/lt.13.html

"in Minneapolis, Zacarias Moussaoui was arrested on immigration charges after a flight school instructor reports his suspicions. Moussaoui wanted training on the Boeing flight simulator.

August 28: The FBI rejects the request of the Minneapolis field office for a Moussaoui search warrant that would have included his laptop computer. According to the recent and now famous memo from Colleen Rowley of the Minneapolis office, that rejection was seen as part of a larger effort by the FBI bureaucracy to thwart the Moussaoui investigation."

After September 11th, the computer was examined and found to have important clues about the 9-11 attacks - which could have been uncovered 2 weeks earlier. This refusal by the FBI was part of a policy by John Ashcroft against intrusive investigations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC